Retail Rumblings
Californian retail reporter Ryan Schuster discusses what's going on with local restaurants and stores.
About schuster80


Real Name:
Ryan Schuster
Gender:
male
Member Since:
March 17, 2006
Last Signed In:
August 23, 2007
Profile Views:
7275
Blog Views:
28536
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Workout machine without weights?
Car dealerships move north
Got fruit smoothies?
Do you still use cash, checks?
Would you support a grocery strike?
Padre holds open house
Holiday Inn Select to become Marriott?
Padre Hotel up for sale again
Local economy among fastest growing in nation
Bob Marx out as head of visitors bureau
Archives
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


schuster80 - > Retail Rumblings -> Would you support a grocery strike?
Would you support a grocery strike?
The union representing grocery store workers at Vons, Albertsons and Ralphs stores in Southern California have rejected the most recent contract proposal from the supermarkets and authorized a potential strike. Both sides have said they intend to return to the negotiating table.  If that doesn't work we may see a repeat of the strike-walkout that dragged on for nearly five months between 2003 and 2004 and battered both sides.
What do you think?  Do you support the workers, who say they are fighting for better pay and benefits, especially for employees who were hired since the last work stoppage?  Would you cross a picket line in order to shop at your neighborhood grocery store or would you go elsewhere?
Posted in these Groups:
Topics: shopping, grocery stores, retail, supermarkets, Vons, Albertsons, labor, unions, bakersfield, blogs, blogging
posted by schuster80 on Tuesday, June 26, 2007 at 07:56 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 496 times
191 comments from 40 users

1 2 3 4

posted by randomfactor on Jun 26, 2007 at 08:19 AM
I won't cross a grocery picket line.
posted by GrpThink on Jun 26, 2007 at 08:59 AM

Nor will I.

Why would we want to support a return to serfdom and feutalism?

posted by adampayne on Jun 26, 2007 at 08:59 AM
I will not cross the line.
posted by sagefever on Jun 26, 2007 at 09:17 AM
I support the workers~there are several places one can shop instead.
posted by Hardliner4freedom on Jun 26, 2007 at 09:23 AM

It's a tougher call this time around compared to the first strike, where I marched right across it.

Realistically speaking, though, it would hardly affect my shopping behavior, since I absolutely will not shop at Vons, and only shop at Albertson's if there's something that I can't obtain anywhere else, or if they're selling our favorite things at give-away-the-store prices.  (And then, we buy only the wildly discounted items.)  (But then, significant discounts have all but disappeared from the Albertson's shelves nowadays...)

Vons started that club card crap, and I will eternally punish them for that.

Albertson's is ever trying to trick shoppers using the ole' bait-and-trick, advertising killer discounts and the stocking full price products where the sale items should be.  (Generally, they do this by stocking the same product, but in a size that is not the discounted size.  Example: boldly advertising 2/$1.00 on 16 oz. bottles of BBQ sauce, and then stocking more expensive, full-price 12 oz. bottles there.  (And they're making customers perform increasingly difficult math problems, such as figuring out how much "7 for $2.50" is.  Easy for me, but difficult for many other people.)

I won't shop at a store that is forever trying to "pull one over" on people.

 

posted by gsisola on Jun 26, 2007 at 09:34 AM
Just as last time, I will not cross their line even though I really didn't get why they "went out", I heard about one of the key issues was that their medical insurance was going from free to $20.00 per month. I don't know about you but I am currently paying $170.00 per month for my "company provided insurance". So......I don't get it. Plus I did talk to some of the employees who work there, they are like friends of mine since I see them at least three times a week. They informed me that they didn't want to "walk out" but when the union walks, you walk. I have belonged to a union myself for years so I do relate with their plight. So NO, I will not cross their line weather I agree with their reasons for "walking" or not.
posted by anonymous on Jun 26, 2007 at 09:49 AM
I will cross the line with glee and a sparkle in my eye, just like last time. While I have nothing against the employees, their union can go take a flying leap and I refuse to change my behavior to further their goals. Unions are on their way to a much deserved extinction, let's not slow down progress, I will keep this post ANON lest a union thug comes to vandalize my property.
posted by koztarr on Jun 26, 2007 at 09:50 AM
I do not like unions.  I will continue to shop at Green Frog.
posted by adampayne on Jun 26, 2007 at 09:53 AM
koztarr, there are union employees at Green Frog.
posted by spacemonster on Jun 26, 2007 at 10:59 AM

I'll cross that line in a heartbeat.

My family needs to eat, and I'm sorry but I put my family above grocery workers I don't know.

And I don't feel like I should have to go to independent grocery stores that are waaaaaaay overpriced.

Grocery workers make a decent wage for being uneducated, so they should be a little more willing to accept proposed contracts.

 

posted by TomW on Jun 26, 2007 at 11:09 AM
I've never crossed a picket line and never will.  It's ridiculous that people will cross the line when weak unions mean weak wages for everyone.  You don't want to pay more?  I don't want to make less.
posted by dusty1215 on Jun 26, 2007 at 11:15 AM
Unions brought us many of the labor laws that protect us. People have some nerve wishing them out of existence, you should be thanking them for what they contributed to the American workforce.

No, I won't cross the picket line.
posted by TomW on Jun 26, 2007 at 11:20 AM
It's interesting to me that people who dislike unions generally think that we shouldn't work together at a national level either.  People working together for everyone's benefit just rubs some people the wrong way.  There's a reason the US is refered to as The Union.
posted by anonymous on Jun 26, 2007 at 11:24 AM
Those who pledge blind allegiance to unions and who bestow upon them credit for all that is good and wholesome in American society usually have never witnessed their inner machinations first hand. I have. Your pre-conceived notions of their goals and aspirations are wrong. It is a cut-throat business, and union reps and bosses stop at nothing and know no shame in achieving their political goals.  They've backed off the violence in recent years, that's about it. The individual member? Disposable. I do not know about the unions of the distant past. I know what they are now, and it's nothing to change your shopping habits over, that's for darn sure.
posted by any1 on Jun 26, 2007 at 11:24 AM

I don't care about unions and I don't care about their picket lines. I don't shop at union stores and pay far less for goods than I would if I did.

My husband once was in a union and they cared  more about him showing up for a meeting to vote on the union rep getting a new car than they did about his employer putting him on the outside scaffolding of a 4 story building without workman's comp coverage.

posted by dusty1215 on Jun 26, 2007 at 11:29 AM
Don't tell me about the inner-workings of unions annoy, I have belonged to three different unions and represented the workers in two of them. Your the one with preconceived notions it seems by calling them all bad.
posted by GrpThink on Jun 26, 2007 at 11:31 AM

Grocery workers make a decent wage for being uneducated

I'm friendly with many of the grocery workers at the two Vons stores I shop at.

Several of them are working their way through college at CSUB. Others have college degrees and work in retail because they either enjoy the contact they have with people or they can't find work in the field of study they graduated in and they stay in Bakersfield because of family. I don't know anyone who has less than a high school diploma who works there.

It's ignorant to believe grocery workers are uneducated.

posted by anonymous on Jun 26, 2007 at 11:32 AM
I will definitely cross the picket line. This question was asked last week and I am wondering if the Californian expects different answers, other than the ones they published in Saturdays paper.

There are many people waiting to apply for their jobs if they strike. The workers are mislead by their union leaders. Ask them to find out what their union reps make?  And, do they realize that the reps are PAID during the strike unlike the common grocery store worker.

This strike is about preying upon the uneducated worker.
posted by any1 on Jun 26, 2007 at 11:36 AM
It is ignorant to believe that a high school diploma is an education.
posted by GrpThink on Jun 26, 2007 at 11:41 AM

It is ignorant to believe that a high school diploma is an education.

That statement alone is ignorance.

You're calling millions of U.S. manufacturing workers uneducated.

Remember that the next time you get in your car, fly in a plane, ride a motorcycle or any other activity which utilizes something made in America.

posted by jfrancais on Jun 26, 2007 at 11:47 AM
Except for rare circumstances (work experience, High School kid, etc.), would a grocery store hire someone without at least a HS diploma?
posted by anonymous on Jun 26, 2007 at 11:49 AM
Any1 sounds like an elitist snob.
posted by any1 on Jun 26, 2007 at 11:53 AM
I  wonder what the union reps are doing for the ex-employees of Ralph's or the ex employees of Guy Chaddick Furniture?
posted by dusty1215 on Jun 26, 2007 at 11:55 AM
What does the closing of Ralphs have to do with union reps any1? Your question is not only ridiculous, it has nothing to do with the topic of grocery stores going on strike.
posted by GrpThink on Jun 26, 2007 at 11:58 AM

would a grocery store hire someone without at least a HS diploma?

Maybe as a night shift stock boy.  But doubtful.

As a cashier or someone in charge of a section? Not likely.

Any1 sounds like an elitist snob.

He sounds like someone with only a high school education.  ;)

posted by anonymous on Jun 26, 2007 at 11:58 AM
Since the 1950's, when they were at their peak, union membership in the private sector has tumbled from 50% of the workforce to the single digit territory. Union proponents like to blame republicans and shrewd employers, as if both of these things did not exist a half century ago. Unions are to blame for their demise. Greed and corruption has a way of doing that. All unions? No. Most, and the UFCW is certainly no angel. They are part of the push to abolish secret ballot union elections. They want to form unions by presenting signatures that they themselves collected. Unions own France, and France is in bad shape, 35 hour workweek and 5 week vacations notwithstanding. Why do you think they just had a conservative revolution over there?
posted by any1 on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:01 PM

Anonymous of 11:49

No, I am someone with not much more than a high school education with no diploma. ( They don't pass them out with the GED.)

My last job was mowing on a golf course for minimum wage, not exactly anything to get snobish about.

posted by anonymous on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:02 PM

I WILL ABSOLUTELY cross the picket line.  NO one is holding a gun to these people's heads, making them work there.  If they are so unhappy, they should get another job.  Are they going to pay for my gas to drive to another store?  Do they give a crap about what kind of benefits you and I or anybody else gets at our jobs?   Of course not.    So they've got a personal problem.  waaah

posted by dusty1215 on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:06 PM
France's idea of conservative is not the same as your idea of conservative annoy. Reagan started busting up the unions when he broke the back of the Air Traffic Controllers union.
From a tompaine article:
In 1978, the labor movement sought to restore some of the workers rights that had been eroded by Taft-Hartley. A labor law reform bill was defeated by one vote in the Senate. Pressured by heavy lobbying from business, Democratic Senator Dale Bumpers of Arkansas was instrumental in the failure to override a Republican filibuster.

This victory strengthened business’ hand even more. Nothing symbolized this more than President Ronald Reagan’s busting of the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Association after they engaged in an illegal strike in 1981. Under Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and now George W. Bush, federal agencies designed to protect workers rights—such as the NLRB and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration—have had their budgets cut and their enforcement staffs eviscerated. Meanwhile, business’s violations of labor laws have increased exponentially. A new union-busting consulting industry has flourished.

The weakness of the American labor movement—compared to its counterparts in other affluent, democratic societies—accounts for many troublesome aspects of our society. The U.S. has the widest gap between rich and poor among democratic nations. It also has the highest poverty rate; 13 percent of all Americans, more than 37 million people, live below poverty. The pay gap between men and women is wider in the U.S. than in other affluent countries. We are the only democratic society without universal health insurance; 47 million Americans lack even basic coverage. We spend less on job training, child care, and affordable housing, and more on prisons, than these other nations. Americans work longer hours, get fewer paid vacation days, and have fewer rights on the job than workers elsewhere. Our environmental and workplace safety laws are weak and poorly-enforced.

posted by mattloch on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:06 PM
Congressional Republicans just killed the pro-union "Employee Free Choice" bill.

That makes Iraq, unions, stem cells, among many other issues that "special interest" groups can run political "issue" (re: hit) ads against in the upcoming elections. Adam, still think that yesterdays' SCOTUS decision on McCain-Feingold was a bad thing? The conservatives may find yesterday's decision hurts them much more than they first believed......
posted by jfrancais on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:09 PM
Conservatives in France would not want to gid rid of 5 week vacations. They focus more on immigration/citizenship issues and the role of France within the EU.
posted by spacemonster on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:10 PM

GrpThink:

Sorry to inform you, but there ARE many undeducated people who work in grocery stores. Do you think it takes a genius to fill a paper sack full of groceries? What do you think that job requires? A Master's degree?

And as for the ridiculous line you drew towards factory workers... who do you think are the people designing the products? The guys with the college degrees, or the guys who have the education to snap two pieces together on an assembly line?

The bottom line of all of this is... if the grocery worker's aren't happy with their jobs or their wages, then it's time for them to move on. I work for the school sytem here in Bakersfield, and if some of us went on strike, would you stop your kids from going to school? It's doubtful... and why? Because you care about your kids (or at least you SHOULD) more than a bunch of disgruntled school system workers. The grocery system ordeal is no different. People shouldn't have to shop at expensive independent markets because a bunch of grocery store workers are pissy.

 

posted by any1 on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:10 PM

Dusty

I just wonder what good a union does when you lose your job thru no fault of your own . Did the retail clerks union help them find new ones?  Did the union say call us when you find a new store to work for?

That was my point.

Is the point of a union to represent you only when things are good?

 

posted by TomW on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:10 PM
"NO one is hlding a gun to these people's heads, making them work there.  If they are so unhappy, they should get another job.  Are they going to pay for my gas to drive to another store?  Do they give a crap about what kind of benfits you and I or anybody else gets at our jobs?   Of course not.    So they've got a personal problem.  waaah"

This is apparently the variant of the "if you don't love America as I want it to be, leave."

There are people who spend their whole lives working to make things better for everyone.  Even the ingrates.  If you're rep'd by a union and you don't like the leadship, take control and implement change.  Same goes for the government.

Geez, I get tired of the whining.  Doesn't mean I'll quit trying to make their lives better.
posted by dusty1215 on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:14 PM
I t certainly wasn't the unions fault that Ralphs made bad business decisions Any1. To infer otherwise is ridiculous. And how do you know the union didn't try to help them find work in other union shops? Can you say for certain that they did not?

One of the bests unions I worked for was the Hotel workers union. When my boss told me to work two more hours, even after I told her I was off shift and had taken some prescription medication for pain, I told her no. I was fired on the spot. The union had my job back in less than three days. Sure, I could of taken them to court for firing me wrongfully, but it would of taken lots of money and many months..all of which would of been unpaid.
posted by randomfactor on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:16 PM

Spacemonster, my kids are out of school, but if there were a teacher's picket line at the school I'd just drive them to the *OTHER* school that didn't have a picket line.  Oh, there aren't alternatives like just shopping at another grocery store?  Maybe your analogy--and your line of argument--don't quite hold water.

.

I'll not cross a legitimate picket line (and I'm not currently a union member.)

posted by jfrancais on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:18 PM

"NO one is holding a gun to these people's heads, making them work there.  If they are so unhappy, they should get another job. 

They can get another job as individuals but as a union they have the leverage to stop labor en masse. I would think that is the idea behind a union. Management tends to listen to grievances more if more than one person complains.

posted by GrpThink on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:18 PM

but there ARE many undeducated people who work in grocery stores

Since I can't find "undeducated" in the dictionary, it's hard to refute this point.

 

And as for the ridiculous line you drew towards factory workers... who do you think are the people designing the products?

Talk about being ridiculous.

Who cares who's designing the products? It's the people who are manufacturing the parts and putting the product together that matter.

Do you blame the designer of the building or the contractor when the roof caves in?

Yeesh.

 

I work for the school sytem here in Bakersfield, and if some of us went on strike, would you stop your kids from going to school

If you were getting screwed over in pay and benefits, yes I would keep my kids home to support you.

posted by spacemonster on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:24 PM

"If you were getting screwed over in pay and benefits, yes I would keep my kids home to support you."

.....So then, you would place the "rights" of bickering worker's over the education of your children?

interesting.

to each their own, I guess.

posted by any1 on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:28 PM

Dusty

I 'm clueless as to what the union did for them and it sounds like you are too.

I am glad that your union got your job back but the union my husband belonged to did nothing about making sure that workman's comp paid for his front teeth when they were knocked out on a job. His new teeth were paid for out of his boss" pocket and the incident was never put 'on the books' consequently we are SOL if anything else happens to them.

 

posted by dusty1215 on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:28 PM
Spacemonster are you actually that uninformed or just being obtuse? Your whole argument is fraught with inaccuracies and down right bs. The whole reason for striking is to improve EVERYONE's lot. Its not the individual, its the group. Your sick and downright farkwitted argument about looking for another job would be hysterical if it wasn't so downright ridiculous. Thats how unions get busted..with simple minds such as yours ignoring what the goal is and only looking at the short term.
posted by GrpThink on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:31 PM

So then, you would place the "rights" of bickering worker's over the education of your children?

You're assuming I wouldn't home school them during the strike, which I would. It would be a valuable lesson for them on worker-labor relations.

 

You said you work for the school district. It's apparent you're in administration and not a teacher. And that makes you biased.

posted by randomfactor on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:33 PM

Any1, it helps if you realize that the grocery union workers *LOST* the last strike.

.

And Spacemonster, I too would keep my kids out of school if I thought the teachers were being shafted.  I would use the opportunity to *TEACH* them about collective action for the collective good...

posted by dusty1215 on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:34 PM
Then if you don't know for certain what, if anything, the union did, and are just running your yap... Its called making crap up as you go along to further your own agenda..which is to make the unions appear useless. Nice try Any1.
posted by schuster80 on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:34 PM
From The Associated Press, here is a breakdown of what the union and supermarkets are negotiating over:
The union representing 65,000 Southern California supermarket workers, the United Food and Commercial Workers, wants to regain concessions made three years ago that created a two-tiered system splitting employees into separate wage and benefit classes.
Prior to that deal, veteran employees qualified for health care after four months and didn’t have to pay any health premiums. Now, workers have had to wait 12 months or more to qualify for health coverage — longer for their dependents — and have been asked to pay premiums for health care.
The supermarkets have offered to remove the wage cap for employees hired after 2004, allowing them to eventually earn as much as veteran employees. The union says the terms are too onerous, as they would require the mostly part-time employees work more than 10 years to reach the top of the pay scale.
The latest company proposals also only offer wage increases to the top tier of workers, according to the union.
The union and the supermarkets appear closer to agreement on the framework of employees’ health plan, having agreed in principle to expand benefits and to shorten the time it takes for workers and their dependents to qualify for health care.
Still, both sides remain far apart on how much money the employers and the workers should contribute to fund the plan.
posted by dusty1215 on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:37 PM
Five bucks says all the anti-union folks on this post didn't know what the strike was about. I did.
posted by spacemonster on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:38 PM

You said you work for the school district. It's apparent you're in administration and not a teacher. And that makes you biased.

Nope.

I'm a grunt without a degree, and that's why I don't pity the uneducated grocery workers.

I'm working on my degree, as are many grocery workers.

But for now, I'm "uneducated" as far as the work force is concerned.

The work force doesn't care if you're "working" on your degree... the work force only cares if you have it or not.

And until you have it, you are at the mercy of your occupation.

The occupation that you CHOSE.

And if your union takes you to strike, you shouldn't expect people to alter their lives just for little old you, because that's not the way of the world.

It's a dog eat dog world, and it really is as simple as that.

posted by dusty1215 on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:42 PM
Maybe in your narrow-minded pov spacemonster, but not in mine. Sorry, but your words have no meaning to me, they are your self-serving pov and nothing more. One for all and all for one makes more sense to me than its a dog eat dog world.

The world is what we make it..and your not working too hard to make it better for everyone it appears.
posted by dusty1215 on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:44 PM
And I hope the union can hold fast and get the things back the benefits they lost in the last strike Anon @ 12:40pm
posted by anonymous on Jun 26, 2007 at 12:44 PM
By never crossing a picket line, you are in effect saying that a union is never wrong and the company is never right. It is inherently an uneducated and mindless position. Unions can often teach a corporation a thing or two about being greedy and unreasonable, and they count on the mindless automatons in society to back them up at the picket line.
1 2 3 4

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: