About smayer


Real Name:
Steven Mayer
Member Since:
May 18, 2006
Last Signed In:
November 16, 2009
Profile Views:
617
Blog Views:
22944
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
What recession? CEO of agency that administers health care to poor gets $13,000 raise
Should Kern institute zero tolerance for dog attacks?
Are Bako's dog control laws strict enough?
Bakersfield man needs bone marrow transplant
Mojave company qualifies for million-dollar Lunar Lander X-Prize
Blowing dust prompts health warning
With little ammo against H1N1, officials aim at seasonal flu
Should the Secret Service have investigated alleged local threat to Obama?
VICIOUS ATTACK: Are we tougher on violent humans than we are on violent dogs?
State asking for billions more in stimulus for high-speed rail
Archives
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
E-mail and Print
Get an e-mail with a magazine you can print to read on the go. Sign up for the Topp Stories Printcast.

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


smayer - > ToppStories -> Supervisors get serious about layoffs
Supervisors get serious about layoffs

First up was the county assessor's office .. in line for nine layoffs in addition to continued vacancies in several unfunded positions.

Believe it or not, supes were leaning toward giving the appraiser's office more money, not less. Why? Because tax appraisals generate revenue.

Interesting! But they want to be sure the need is there.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics: Kern, layoffs, budget
posted by smayer on Tuesday, June 9, 2009 at 10:34 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 745 times
9 comments from 2 users

1

posted by smayer on Jun 9, 2009 at 10:53 AM

Supervisor Don Maben: "If there was any time to use the fiscal reserves, this is it."

Supervisor Jon McQuiston: "I think we need to suck it up and say we meant what we said .... We need to move forward with the recommendations staff has made" for layoffs.

Supes are worried that more cuts to assessor's office could reduce the county's revenues in the future. Assessor Jim Fitch warns that proposed layoffs could reduce revenues by $12 million next year.

 

 

posted by smayer on Jun 9, 2009 at 11:12 AM

Watson moves to continue discussions to budget hearings in mid-July .. no second.

Another motion to come back in two weeks questioned by Rubio and McQuiston.

Motion withdrawn.

Maggard moves that they authoize the job deletions, but pushing back effective date to post-budget.

 

 

posted by smayer on Jun 9, 2009 at 11:15 AM

Consensus: What can be cut has been cut. Now they're talking people and services.


posted by smayer on Jun 9, 2009 at 11:23 AM

Public comments:

Michael Turnipseed, Kern County Taxpayers Association:

Assessor's office is a core function.

Are we going to keep everybody half-alive?

McQuiston asked him whether the taxpayer's association has any specific recommendations.

After Turnipseed recovered from the apparently unexpected question, he said he would ask his board and get back to Supes.

 

 

posted by insidegal on Jun 9, 2009 at 11:28 AM

 OMG - what a mess.   These officials are STILL talking about the need to clarify process and priorities - even though the CAO is well into creating her proposed budget !!   Seems like those kind of things should have been established awhile back ??? If the BOS is unclear about such things,  what kind of guidelines is Ladd following ??   And btw,  how in the heck did she narrow the gap from 13 to 5 million in just a week?   nobody discussed that little change ...

posted by smayer on Jun 9, 2009 at 11:48 AM

OK, Supes bit the bullet and passed recommendations for cuts to Assessor's office, with one caveat:

The effective date was pushed back to late July or early August to give administrators some time to better determine which positions and jobs can be deleted.

The possible addition of four appraisers is still on the table to make sure tax revenues are not lost as a result of these cuts.

Fitch comming back in two weeks to get more specific.

posted by smayer on Jun 9, 2009 at 11:56 AM

Parks  & Rec. was next up. Supes approved nine layoffs.

Parks and Recreation Director Bob Lerude said the nine job deletions do not include other deleted positions, including 35 extra-help jobs that haven't been filled for the summer.

Park users can count on seeing dirtier restrooms, trash picked up in parks less often and some recreation halls being closed.

 

posted by insidegal on Jun 9, 2009 at 05:35 PM

The Assessor's situation is a head scratcher? whats the real story here?  why didnt the CAO treat the Assessor like the Sheriff  if assessments are so critical to county revenues?  she could have proposed something for him that would allowed the Assessor to retain his appraisers ... something smells fishy here ...  TBC should put Burger on it ...

posted by smayer on Jun 9, 2009 at 05:44 PM

The numbers, by department:

Assessor-Recorder -- Nine positions deleted resulting in six layoffs

Parks and Recreation -- 20 positions deleted resulting in nine layoffs

General Services -- 18 positions deleted resulting in 12 layoffs

Total -- 47 positions deleted; 27 layoffs; fiscal savings approximately $2.7 million

More layoffs are expected.

Check out the full story here

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement