|
Depressing Christmas cards Leading Catholic: Disney has corrupted kids Kid comes before designer jeans Predicting the stock market Judge: Obese fliers should get two airline seats Palin's unfortunate interview backdrop! Record number of pot plants seized in state Safe haven or easy way out? Where's the good gas prices news? McDonald's shines in bad economy June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 January 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 August 05 July 05 June 05 May 05 April 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Who cares how long the loan is?
As things get more expensive, the time length of loans has become longer.
The former 30-year mortgage has given way to 40- and 50-year plans. Some people think that's bad. I'm guessing most people don't. It's all about what you can afford in a month and if a longer loan makes buying a house more monthly affordable, what's the big deal? True, if you actually paid on it for 50 years, you would be paying much more in interest. But in the mean time, that's simply a tax deduction. It's different for car loans. Those too have lengthened. But there is no tax deduction involved. So yes, you are throwing more money away but you get to ride in that shiney new car as you do it. Does this trend toward longer loans bother you? 18 comments from 8 users
1
posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 31, 2006 at 09:50 AM
Not as much as the interest-only loan and ARM's do. They're going to devastate the housing market even as they make more money for refinancers. . (Mine's a 30, fixed-rate. ) . Granted, it doesn't make *THAT* much difference how long the loan is, if you plan on selling soon. But how desperate your neighbors are to sell and cut their losses makes a *HELL* of a lot of difference. posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Jul 31, 2006 at 09:58 AM
The problems are many-fold.
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Jul 31, 2006 at 10:11 AM
Which brings to my mind the biggest financial wrong turn that our society seems to have made:
More and more of us have come to accept a lifetime of debt payments for cars and housing as a fact of life. There is no reason to accept that.
posted by
shayladphillipsmc
on Jul 31, 2006 at 10:25 AM
Well people are living longer than they used to. Could that be part of the reason, these loans are coming into play?Just an observation.
posted by
mattloch
on Jul 31, 2006 at 11:02 AM
posted by
tonyh
on Jul 31, 2006 at 11:20 AM
Thr foreclosure rate in Kern County is already climbing like a homesick Angel. The Real Estate Industry has started their agressive marketing, to convince people that it's all still good. They're talking things up, in the News Paper too. You know, when this starts, they're trying to sell the general public a bill of goods. Houses are sitting on the market for several months, or the owners are coming WAY off of their asking prices. People are walking away from recently purchased homes for many reasons. Things should be ripe for the pickin's in a year, maybe year-and-a-half. It's like watching a wave brake over. posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 31, 2006 at 12:01 PM
You ain't seen nothing yet, Tony. Wait till the ARM's kick in and peoples' monthly payment doubles--and when they try to sell, they find prices have fallen to where they're upside-down. I wouldn't buy a new house right now, it's like buying stuff for yourself the day before Christmas. Why not wait until the after-Christmas sales you KNOW are coming in a short while? . The problem with waves like that is a lot of people down. And housing is the only thing keeping the US economy afloat. posted by
tonyh
on Jul 31, 2006 at 12:53 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 31, 2006 at 01:28 PM
posted by
Goat
on Jul 31, 2006 at 02:57 PM
posted by
tonyh
on Jul 31, 2006 at 08:35 PM
posted by
bakonative
on Jul 31, 2006 at 08:54 PM
Let's say you need to borrower $300,000. On a 40 year loan, (7.125%) with a balloon due in 30, here are the facts: Your principal and interest only payment is $1891.59. In 30 years you will have paid $542,992.99 in INTEREST ONLY. Your principal has reduced from $300,000 to 162,944.70. Your loan is now due and payable and you still owe the $162,944.70 AFTER 30 YEARS. Oh, but you wanted a 50 year loan? Do you really want to know the figures? Ha ha. I don't mean to say that a 30 year loan does not have an astronomical amount of interest paid, but at least there is not a balloon payment that you are left hanging with. In an example of a straight fixed 30 year loan. Let's go with the exact same figures, apple to apple. Principal and interest payments would be $2021.16. You will pay $427,612.12 in interest over 30 years. But your loan will be paid off in full, you paid less in interest, and you own your home outright. Too many youngsters (and yes, some of the older adults who should know better) see, want, and will do anything to buy their mansion. I say go for it. Us hawks are waiting for you to crash and will scoop up your houses on a foreclosure market that is destined to be a real kicker. After all, we are the ones who scrapped and saved our money the old fashioned traditional way! posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Aug 1, 2006 at 08:22 AM
Bravo, Bakonative. Three cheers from someone who made it: me!
When someone buys a car, he is considered a sucker if he bases his purchase decision on the size of the payment rather than the price of the car. Why is it suddenly OK to think this way when buying a home?
posted by
randomfactor
on Aug 1, 2006 at 08:22 AM
Apparently housing values are about to go negative for the first time in, well, *EVER*, according to some experts. Sure, values in ACTUAL terms declined between '79 and '84, but that's because they didn't keep up with inflation. We're apparently about to see some sticker shock. Thank you, Mr. President (I'm in a unique situation with my refi last year, but it's going to hurt a LOT of people. We're talking possible recession, oh, about the time of the mid-term election. But as Bako points out, a lot of vultures are circling.) . posted by
Goat
on Aug 1, 2006 at 09:48 AM
posted by
MyLefteFoot
on Aug 1, 2006 at 09:55 AM
All that a 50 year loan means, is that you get to paint the walls the color of your choice. Otherwise you don't own your house anymore than when you rented one. The lending institution will always own it. 50 year loans are a scam on the poor. posted by
randomfactor
on Aug 2, 2006 at 10:02 AM
posted by
anonymous
on Aug 6, 2006 at 10:49 AM
As a victim of a layoff two years ago (now re-employed at a considerably lower salary), I know I would be running a deficit if not for my paid-off house.
1
BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:Advertisement |