A blog about News.
About talkofthetown


Member Since:
June 21, 2006
Last Signed In:
December 02, 2008
Profile Views:
10752
Blog Views:
147889
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Depressing Christmas cards
Leading Catholic: Disney has corrupted kids
Kid comes before designer jeans
Predicting the stock market
Judge: Obese fliers should get two airline seats
Palin's unfortunate interview backdrop!
Record number of pot plants seized in state
Safe haven or easy way out?
Where's the good gas prices news?
McDonald's shines in bad economy
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


talkofthetown - > Talk of the Town -> O.J. Simpson, what do you mean, If?
O.J. Simpson, what do you mean, If?
O.J. Simpson has written a book called "If I did it" explaining that if he killed his wife Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ron Goldman, this is how he would do it.

Plus he's going on Fox TV Nov. 27 and 29 to tell all.

My favorite reaction to this is from CW Nevius who wrote, "
It could be said that the national reaction was split 50-50. Half the country thought it was the dumbest idea they'd ever heard, and the other half thought Simpson was out of his mind."

"I consider this his confession," publisher Judith Regan said of the book which she said gives
a "bone-chilling account" of the night of the June 1994 murders.

As condemnation flowed from the victims' families, publishers, broadcasters and bloggers, Simpson's publisher, Judith Regan, defended the decision, The Los Angeles Times reported.

"It's not fiction," said Ms Regan, who will conduct the televised interview. Asked if Simpson would agree with that, she replied: "I don't know."

The former American football player and actor came to her with the idea, Ms Regan said. 

Do you want to make O.J. feel good by giving him your feedback?

Posted by Steve E. Swenson

 


Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by talkofthetown on Thursday, November 16, 2006 at 09:00 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 412 times
31 comments from 13 users

1

posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 08:35 AM
People just do not have respect for justice if it does not turn put in their favor. This whole outrage is not about right or wrong, that was settled in the courts, this outrage is about a bunch of vindictive greedy people who just need time on the TV talk shows.
posted by dgrealish on Nov 16, 2006 at 09:46 AM
Which vindictive greedy people?  This book is pretty in your face.  Remember, it was OJ Simpson's own children's mother who was murdered!
posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 09:51 AM
So what is the problem? does it bend your nose that a Black man was actually found not guilty? I yes, I guess OJ is no Robert Blake.

All the parties are greedy publicity chasing idiots who play the racial card at every opporunity.
posted by dusty1215 on Nov 16, 2006 at 09:52 AM
NBC did turn down the interview before Fox accepted it..just to be clear it has been shopped around.
posted by dgrealish on Nov 16, 2006 at 09:56 AM

Black or White, Blake or Simpson, his children should account for something.  To write a book about "how he could have killed their mother" is more than a little insensitive.  I'd hope anyone would have more compassion toward their children than that, regardless of their age.

posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 10:14 AM
They continue to make fools of themselves and make money because they know that thare always many fools who will be outraged and out rage pays at the book store and at the Televison circuit.

As for the children, they know more of the truth than you or i will ever know.....but the best way to provide for them and hide your earning from the other greedies...untouchable trust funds. These kids will cry all the way to the bank and leave the outrage to you.

Everyone made money from Simpson, Heraldo, and half the people at Fox made their names as a result of the Simpsom TV melodrama. John Gibson at Fox was a nobody until he became Heraldo's ventriliquest dummy during Simpson..

Beside Simpson says, if he had, which regardless of  the Simpson juries decision, some have never accepted.  If Simpson was white and his  alleged victims had been Black, this would be a non-issue.
posted by dgrealish on Nov 16, 2006 at 10:23 AM
If allowed to keep proceeds from the book, Simpson will most likely spend it on his own comforts.  If forced to pay the judgments, at least part of the money will go to the Nichole Simpson trust set up for the children.  Looks to me as if that's the only way they'll make it to the bank, laughing or crying.
posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 10:26 AM
Your hate for Blacks is ingrained so deep that you can only evil deeds by them, Oh well, Simpson knows that too...so he will continue to be outrageious and let you sell his books for him.
posted by dwatsonII on Nov 16, 2006 at 11:24 AM
Why is it that the black-man still feels picked on? This is not about race, it is about ill-served justice, you dolt!
posted by dgrealish on Nov 16, 2006 at 11:28 AM
dwatson, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. 
posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 11:32 AM
dwatson,,   I hear you, white man's justice still rules!!!
Give 'em hell Strom!
posted by gr8scott on Nov 16, 2006 at 12:33 PM

O.J. is someone who loves to get people in an uproar. Every now and then he comes up with something to twist the knife, so to speak, in the Goldmans and Browns and of course the media.

The thing is, it works everytime and that makes him a pretty sick person.

If the media wasn't so bloodthirsty for a flippping "news" story, O.J. would wither away and die, but every time he sticks his head out of the door, the media jumps all over it.

What I find funny is that the media and bloggers is that they jump all over O.J. for making money or becoming even more infamous, is that they give Nicole Brown's sister a pass. She's one of the biggest whores out there making money and becoming "famous" off of her sister's death. That shouldn't come as a surprise to me or anyone else seeing that she and her family lived off of O.J.

Where was she (they) when he was beating her ass? Living the good life off of O.J.

I find that a little more sick than O.J. doing stupid videos, books and interviews.

Post Script: I also believe that the perceived hatred of all things O.J. has a racial element. I just would have stated it differently than the anonymous poster.

posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 12:44 PM
We cannot blame the media for OJ and his stupid exposure, the public demands it and the media gives it to them.....unfortunate but this is America.

And as well all know, Fox is fair and balanced!
posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 01:34 PM
Wouldn't it be nice if the media put their collective minds together to NOT cover this story.  OJ doesn't deserve any more face time.
posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 03:00 PM
Fox Entertainment is different than Fox News. 
posted by dwatsonII on Nov 16, 2006 at 03:05 PM
Dont you all mean, "FAUX" News?
posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 03:11 PM
How can you tell the difference, between news and entertainment at Fox? Or is that their WMD?
posted by randomfactor on Nov 16, 2006 at 03:17 PM
Dwatson, the problem is that about 75 percent of Bakersfield doesn't know what "faux" means.  And we're tired of explaining the joke.
posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 03:34 PM
No,  you are all waiting to hear how a Black man got away with killing a white woman and a white man.....If he did.

As I said if OJ had gang banged a black couple, this would not be an issue and OJ would be history and have zero publicity value.

But sex, race, money is money in the bank when it comes to American entertainment.

When a white celebrity like Robert Bake gets it is a good case, when OJ gets away it is LAPD incompetence, you are coming through loud and clear!!!
The Simpsons and Goldmans are greedy gold diggers, but so is OJ...they still have something in common but this was known a lon time ago.
posted by Radcjb on Nov 16, 2006 at 03:40 PM
He did it.  We know it.  But who cares??  I think if everyone did NOT tune in or pay any attention, that might get the point accross (maybe not).  He's just another Madonna.  They aren't in the lime light, so they have to think of something to get everyone to look at them.  

Well, WE AREN'T LOOKING!!!!  

How horrible for his kids!  Just how mean spirited can he be?!!  Obviously, A LOT!!!  It would serve him right if his kids cut him off.

We should all pitch in and buy him a shirt that reads, "ME, ME, ME! It's all about ME!"
posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 04:34 PM
Get off the race thing already!  This isn't about black or white.  It's about a "football hero" getting away with murder because he was a football hero.  There was enough evidence that the rest of us, black or white, would have wound up in prison for life for such a crime.  There's also the fact that he had beaten her up a few times during their marriage; should he have been allowed that "privilege", just because he's black?
posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 05:10 PM
I know it pains you white knight, but the fact that a Blackman beat the system just gripes you no end. If Nicole had been Black still be laughing.

Whether he was a football hero or anything else does not matter, it is the race of the victims that matters, You sound like Bill O'rally.

Everbody made money, Furman is on TV tonight touting his latest book and his talk show..he is happy as as a biug in a rug.

Stop being so goody goody, the evidence did not prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt....what PART OF NOT GUILTY DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND, are alll Black men guilty?

As for all the other parties. they lived off his fame for many years including his sister-in-laws, now they are whiining because he took them off the dole, as for Goldman he is just greedy.
posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 05:12 PM

Posted by Drummel
I agree, this is not a "black" issue. OJ was more white than most white people.
I think forensics did a pretty good job telling us how OJ did it.
I'm curious about what set him off.
Other than that, the book and the interview is a waste of time.

posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 05:14 PM
Posted by Drummel:
TaftMom, is that you?
posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 05:15 PM
Denial is A TERRIBLE THING!!!
posted by Glocker on Nov 16, 2006 at 05:28 PM
He may have been found Innocent in the criminal case, but remember he was found guilty in the civil trial. You are right it's not about race so quit making it so. He DID the homicide. If he was so overwhelmingly Innocent, why was he convicted in the civil matter? 
If it was all about race you twit, then why is no one rallying around poor old Scott Peterson, the other wife killer?
I don't know about you, but I'm glad he kept his promise to pursue his children's mothers killer  like he promised...............
posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 05:41 PM
Glocker, fellow twit, I know it hurts terribly to see this black man rub your nose in the race justice system, but lighten up, he was found not guilty in criminal court, the civil trial was just white vengeance at work.
Of course no one is rallying around Scott Peterson, he was not a Hall of Fame anything, besides his victims were not Brentwood trash, so where would the interest come from.

Hey don't all killers innocent or guilty convicted in the world of public opinion look for the real killer on the gulf course?

Geez, Jagels should have prosecuted this case, Blacks never get away from him in Kern.

posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 06:24 PM
I guess OJ will be the subject for years to come as many and most in Kern believe that he should have received an Emmett Till trial, you know Black Guy who was hung by god fearing white people for "whistling" at a white woman in god's country.
posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 09:28 PM
Okay okay, OJ and Blacks are terrible people, the Greedy Goldman's are wonderful compassionate white people and the Simpson's are the white template for goodness.

And you eriik are as white as pure driven snow  who does not have a racist bone in your body and are driven only by the you need to obtain the true facts that justify the whites and purest intentions, race is not a factor in the saga of OJ Simpson.....better?

By the way Simpson owes you and your bro's a debt of garatitude for bring his what should be a nothing book to the top of the money list....he could not generate more interest on his own....devious those Black people.
posted by anonymous on Nov 16, 2006 at 10:20 PM

He capitalizes Black, but not white.  Shame, shame !

posted by anonymous on Nov 17, 2006 at 10:31 AM

Posted by Drummel:

I think OJ should have titled his book "If I did it, I wouldn't have left a trail of my blood"

 

or how about these...

 

"If I did it, I should have killed Ron's father too"

 

"If I did it, I should have worn K-mart tennies"

or my favorite....

"If I did it, wait... I did do it!"

 

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:

Advertisement