|
Judge: Obese fliers should get two airline seats Palin's unfortunate interview backdrop! Record number of pot plants seized in state Safe haven or easy way out? Where's the good gas prices news? McDonald's shines in bad economy 10 most irritating phrases Rush Limbaugh: Never wrong, always Right We're simply not spending as much nowadays Airlines ignore lower fuel costs June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 January 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 August 05 July 05 June 05 May 05 April 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
'Montauk Monster' mystery deepens
Check out this Newsday story on the strange-looking beast which washed ashore in Long Island recently. And Gawker has all kinds of stuff on the bloated blob, including links to an interview with the women who found the monster. 11 comments from 9 users
1
posted by
BakersfieldSuperman
on Aug 1, 2008 at 09:48 AM
posted by
AudreyB
on Aug 1, 2008 at 10:00 AM
How many ways can you spell F A K E. f r a u d s h a m p h o n y c o u n t e r f e i t It doesn't look any more real today than it did on yesterdays blog. posted by
AudreyB
on Aug 1, 2008 at 10:03 AM
BTW Why is there only one picture of this thing? If you found it wouldn't you take dozens of pictures. Wouldn't you turn the thing over and take pictures of that side too. Wouldn't you pose next to it to show ownership and bragging rights? posted by
lanabuford
on Aug 1, 2008 at 10:13 AM
I wouldn't touch it.....But Yes, take lots of pictures. Doesn't look like a monster.
posted by
Rickldo
on Aug 1, 2008 at 10:20 AM
posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Aug 1, 2008 at 10:32 AM
Same guy? Different shot? Still, to be real, it should have something in shot for reference (size, etc.) posted by
antiextremism
on Aug 1, 2008 at 11:04 AM
What's not to believe!
posted by
Shwaine
on Aug 1, 2008 at 12:23 PM
Well, now we know it had fur and is a male animal, but still, nothing for size reference and no body for the scientists to test. So it's either an elaborate hoax or just another dead animal that was in the water long enough for bloating and decay to distort its features. It's not a monster or a cryptid. This reminds me of when a dead white sturgeon washed up on the shore of some football player's home and people were calling it an armoured monster until someone pointed out what it was. posted by
antiextremism
on Aug 1, 2008 at 04:29 PM
My dog thinks the beaked rodent pig is real!
posted by
pamg
on Aug 1, 2008 at 04:42 PM
There's a fly on its back; not much for a size reference but it's something. posted by
honestjohn
on Aug 24, 2008 at 04:03 PM
Looks like a wild Boar to me. I've been hunting them for years. Probably a subspecies from another continent that was thrown overboard.
1
BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:Advertisement |