All >
News
Presidential Candidates analyzed at St. Meinrad Philosophy Conference
By: Richard Poirier
Topics: Presidential Candidates,
barack obama,
John McCain,
Alasdair MacIntyre,
Philosophy
Posted by RichardPoirier
Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:02:39 PDT
Viewed 184
times
0
responses
2
comments
Unlike many presidential debate hosts, philosophers actually seek the truth wherever it may lead. The Second Annual International Society for MacIntyrean Philosophy conference was held this year in the United States, July 30 through August 3, 2008, at Saint Meinrad School of Theology in Indiana. It attracted philosophy, law and political science professors and graduate students from Europe and North America.
This year’s conference focus was Alasdair MacIntyre’s published works on “Theory, Practice, and Tradition: Human Rationality in Pursuit of the Good Life.” As a local Californian music industry financial executive, writer and philosopher invited to present a paper at the conference, I felt that all of the conference theme elements were necessarily included in any serious discussion of the impending presidential election. So I presented a rather bold paper entitled “The Presidential Candidates: Agents of Change or ‘Partners’ in maintaining the Status Quo?”
My presentation examined the societal significance of the presidential election within the context of political power in the modern liberal state. I approached this rather large topic by assessing whether philosopher MacIntyre’s observation that a primary feature of the modern liberal state is to not align itself with any specific notion of what constitutes ‘the human good’ is in fact actually representative of its practices. I did this by contrasting MacIntyre’s notion with the public statements of presidential candidates Barack Obama and John McCain.
I began the presentation by stating, “Alasdair MacIntyre famously ends After Virtue by drawing qualified parallels between the conditions shortly before the Roman Empire’s decline into the Dark Ages and conditions facing our own age in Europe and North America. One parallel is that people of good-will reach a turning point when they no longer believe that those in government possess civility and moral integrity -- virtues that communities value.
“One difference MacIntyre points out is that Rome’s adversarial barbarians were ‘waiting beyond the frontiers,’ whereas the barbarians of today ‘have been governing us for quite some time.’ This notion that we are governed by barbarians provides a new frame of reference we may use in evaluating the two major party candidates currently running for president of the United States. This paper examines five questions that may provide insight into today’s political barbarians.
“First, are those in political power maintaining a great public illusion that we have a representative government that protects and promotes the people’s interests, while their only agenda is to instead protect and promote the interests of the ruling elite? Second, are opposing political candidates actually ‘partners’ - each needing the other as a target - in framing the ideological debate to limit public discussion of vital issues, thus maintaining the status quo as MacIntyre maintains?
“Third, are elections for real? Do we have real choices in elections such as voting for ‘none of the above’ or whether we agree to be bound by laws passed in our name? Fourth, do candidates really support a neutral state, a pluralistic society and the necessary environment in which individuals can pursue the good life? Fifth, has either candidate articulated what constitutes ‘the good’? Is there any chance that, if promoted properly, such a view could reach a public consensus?”
Regardless of one’s point of view of the candidates, this paper will provide the reader with new reference points in which the judge the candidates and the nature of politics in our time. The full presentation is available on Richard Poirier’s Political and Philosophical Commentary blog on the Backersfield.com website at http://people.bakersfield.c....
Those wishing to comment may do so in the “Leave A Comment” section at the end of the presentation paper.
Comment From: ApolloDawn
Sat Nov 8, 2008 17:48:12 PST
Would you please post this in the Blog section as well?
I have been watching for your next contribution, but I have only been checking the blog.
Comment From: RichardPoirier
Mon Nov 10, 2008 21:16:59 PST
Thanks Apollo Dawn for your valuable suggestion. I have just posted this article to my blog with a new postscript comment.
Richard