Bakersfield.com

All > News
Berg vs. Obama, Civil Action No. 08-cv-4083
Topics: election, Politics, barack obama
Posted by jkappel Thu Oct 23, 2008 13:35:08 PDT
Viewed 139 times
0 responses 3 comments

I am quite a bit upset that this story has not recieved much main stream media attention.  Apparently Obama's citizenship has been questioned by a law suit against him in Pennsylvania (Berg vs. Obama, Civil Action No. 08-cv-4083) filed on August 21st, 2008.

     This law suit makes allegations that Senator Obama may not be qualified to run for president based on the qualifications put forth by the U.S. Constitution.   Senator Obama was served notice that he was to provide documents proving his qualification for review by the Judge.  He has not produced any documents, and is instead trying to dismiss the case via other legal actions.  Why would Senator Obama not produce his documents proving his citizenship?  Isn't that a requirement for all candidates?

     This seems to be more than just some low ball attempt to discredit the senator, but rather is a true concern about whether he meets the constitutional requirements to become president.  Apparently Fox news has covered the story in Toledo Ohio from their local news desk there, but there has been little other coverage.

    Don't you all agree that if someone running for president is being sued over his qualifications we should all be made aware of the details?  What could be more important news than this?  Why have our local news sources not picked up on this?  We should demand accountability for this outrage.

Send to a Friend

Report a Violation

Comment From: jkappel

Well, I just found the courts ruling on this matter. As of October 22, 2008 The court declared that Senator Obama is not a "natural born" or "naturalized" United states citizen and is inelligible to run for president.  The court then ordered the Democratic National Convention and Barack Obama to cease all campainging on his behalf and to remove him from the presidential ticket.

 

To read about it follow this link and read document 27:

http://dockets.justia.com/d...

WHY HAVE WE STILL NOT HEARD ABOUT THIS ON THE NEWS!

For more information please contact the plaintiff:

Philip J. Berg, Esquire
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Cell (610) 662-3005
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659
philjberg@obamacrimes.com

Comment From: Anon1

The court has not ruled on this matter. If you review the docket and documents carefully, you will notice that the DRAFT ORDER associated with link 27 is NOT signed (as is the order under link 4 with the little gavel next to it - indicating that the judge has made a decision). Another draft order was attached to the motion associated with filing 8. It is common practice for lawyers to file draft orders when they file the motion so that, if the judge agrees completely, he/she can sign the draft order and make it official rather than having his/her judicial assistant type up a new order. It's a way to make it easy on the judge. Link 27 just indicates that a motion was filed. If an order was issued, there would be a separate link and the description would mention that it contains an order. Comment From: jkappel

Thank you Anon1. I see what you mean now. It actually makes me feel a little better about it. I will keep an eye on it and report back on this topic as I see progress happening.