It looks weird. The only way to get the fashion designers to stop using emaciated models is for rich people and celebrities to stop buying their clothes.
You know, a lot of these same models and celebrities jumped on the animal-rights bandwagon a couple of decades ago and strong-armed the cosmetic companies to stop testing their products on animals. From what I remember, L'Oreal was the last drugstore cosmetics company to stop testing on animals, and that was probably 10 years ago or more.
Because a bunny in a cage with burned eyes is an ugly image, and it was an image that Peta successfully disseminated throughout the fashion industry. But somehow the routine images of skeletons walking fashion runways isn't off-putting. I guess the news stories of "former" models dying of anorexia isn't off-putting, either.
Yeah yeah, I know these women are naturally tall and thin to begin with, but they can't fool me. I know an underweight person when I see one, and I know an emaciated person when I see one. Underweight is one thing, but emaciated is de rigeur right now. Sad.
well, if mothers and fathers would put a stop to their daughters wearing hoochie tops and super tight jeans, as well as watching the shows and programs that promote this type of behavior, maybe it would stop
oh yeah, you can also quit buying all the trendy clothes too, because they all promote it
Enough to make me want to consider diverting the money I've been sending to children that I sponsor in Sri Lanka and India to her. But then looks can be deceiving. I still marvel at how one old man who was all of about 5 feet tall and 100 pounds or so was able to bring in one 70-pound bag of rice after another onto his shoulders from a loaded pickup into a restaurant in Indonesia. I just had to buy a meal for him and the other three guys in his crew.
The model isn't this thin, the image was altered. Ralph Lauren photoshopped the image without her consent and knowledge to make her appear much smaller and thinner. She said it made her sick to see her head on this altered body. The model has decided to come forward about being fired because 120#s was considered too fat. She is advocating a healthy weight for models.
I never weighed over 80lbs unless I was pregnant (105lb ) until I had my last child 12 yrs ago! I couldn't gain weight no matter what I ate......Then it hit me....LOL! Now i wish i hadn't complained so much...
Back in the early 80’s, when I was just out of college, my first steady gig was working for a catalog house in Orange County. That was back when monkey wards and Sears spent big bucks on catalogs, along with many other companies.
Shot a zillion clothing shots while there, and all the models were very thin.
The camera does add weight. The visual illusion is caused by viewing a 3D body shape in 2D in print. Lighting and pose can remedy this in portrait work, but a catalog shot is used to sell clothes, and the model is a prop. We had to light to enhance fabric, textures, and the drape of the apparel, not the model.
A lady with a normal build tends to make clothes drape in a less flattering manner in photos, so skinny models were, and still are the norm.
Vendors like RL are a minority in the biz, when considering the full gamut of clothing women buy for themselves. RL manages to sell clothing at 500 to 1,000% over value by virtue of the exotic and trendy imagery they use, and a young and gullible target market.
The sad truth is, 23 years old is long in the tooth for today's high fashion “trendy” model.
You’ll notice in the article that the young lady began at age 15. Once the first sign of natural aging become apparent, it’s time to find fresh meat. The target market never gets older, but models do.
I sincerely hope the young lady saved a good portion of her earnings, and moves on.
thats not even sexy see those kind of girls are just tasteless and unculturized, give me the girl next door, or a thick girl with a amazing personality and brains and im set. i need to find me a girl that can go 5 minutes without texting WHAT AND WHO ARE YOU WIT H?
Bad health: being skinny is much better for you than being fat. Life expectancy is higher. Diseases of the heart are rarer. Diseases of the blood are lower.
I know, I know. Stand up and defend skinniness and you are stuck in the camp that supports beauty pageants and diets for pre-teen girls and other brands of insanity.
I think this, like so many things, is best answered with the Golden Mean: Moderation in all things.
I personally like "curvier" women also. But I'm not going to feed into the "eat another hamburger, skinny thing!" camp either.
Moderation in what you eat. Moderation in your goal weight. Moderation in exercise. Moderation in alcohol.
I feel that you should weigh the same amount for what ever your height is. Like if you are 5'1 then you shouldn't weigh 180lbs and or if you are 5'11 you shouldn't weigh 90lbs. I'm 5'8 and I weigh 160lbs so to me I think that my weight is ok. I hope that makes sense. So I think even being chunky is not healthy but being to skinny is just not healthy either or of course to fat as well. But then its hard to stay a certain weight when there is like a McDonald's and Taco Bell in every corner in Bakersfield. Then again I love to eat fast food myself but I improving myself on eating healthy food now days.