Don't hold your breath, BS.  Or better still, *DO*.

.

Obama thinks tax relief should go to the middle-class, not Paris Hilton.  You disagree, I know.  And where are Cindy McCain's tax returns?  What is she hiding?  Is *SHE* a lobbyist?

Whoever gets in office will have to raise taxes~ see mounting war debt. Hopefully it won't be on the backs of the middle class and the working poor, 

The GOP is toast in November:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stor...

Cindy McCain Should Release Tax Returns

Senator John McCain's wife, Cindy McCain, has decided not to release her tax returns -- not now and not in the future. In the interest of transparency and to support her husband's frequent calls for clean and open government, she should rethink that decision.

Oh hey there RF,

Let me see you want me to die because I disagree and Barrack Obama thinks what? Hmm that's funny all of his socialist comments and policies,

he may want tax breaks to go to middle class but he will raise their taxes.

that's reality. You see that's the problem with Obama he says great things but his actual policies are contrary to what he will do.

RF before you go all crazy tell me, do you refute the statement above?

Let me say it again for you, Obama want to help everyone but the way he will do it is paid for by raising taxes. Bottom line he wants to raise taxes so that the Government is in charge of giving those funds out and "helping" people. Even though every time the Government is put in charge of things like this waste fraud corruption and oversight gets out of control....VA, post office, SS, etc...

Read My Lips.......

Obama has what it takes to turn this country in a new direction. If he doesn't who cares.....anything is better than what we have. ..........but I do believe Michelle Obama is open game.

Define middle-class. I bet you, he, and probably I have different ideas.

Middle class:   A class of hard working people who slowly became poverty stricken by the missmanagement of top goverment officals lining thier BushCo friends pockets.

Sage no they won't, Dems would have you think, that but in a capitalist society like ours, lowering taxes and tariffs actually generate more profits. I agree with McCain who says raising taes during an economic slowdown is the worst thing you can do. That's basic economics guys c'mon. Its like you guysarnt even trying anymore...

Maggie, I

wonder why? Why does she have to release her tax returns? Privacy I know doesn't mean much to you but it does to a lot of people.

Maggie tell me why she should release them, convince me.

Explain why, I would love to hear this. Maybe you can then you can convince me why McCain is a traitor to the US after, like you tried to peddle to me several posts ago. You were quoting that defunct group of despicable people, "Veterans against McCain", lol, Good Luck Maggie Poo

Middle class used to begin at $35,000/year for a family of four. Probably $50,000 now.

Obama has the power to destroy this country ya ding a ling.. And Supy as far as paying attention to RF..umm hes got a host of problems himself to deal with. Just about anything and everytihing he stands for are direct opposite of what I was ever taught or believe in..so I mostly ignore what he says these days.you might wanna do the same...for every single slam he makes on the republicans i can make 10 more on the democrats..but ignoring just feels better

But Obama doesn't have the determination to destroy the country shown by McCain. 

Just *WHAT* did his Communist captors brainwash that guy into doing to us?  Speaking of the "Manchurian Candidate..."

Cindy McCain should release her tax returns because they would show whether McCain would personally benefit from his cockeyed economic scheme.  And how much her personal wealth has supported her husband's power-lust.  But mainly because they made Mrs. Kerry release *HERS*.

McCains Keeps All Assets In Cindy's Name (Except One Checking Account)

John McCain has repeatedly argued that his wife's financial holdings are separate from his political life, and should remains so for the privacy of her and her children. However, as Slate pointed out this weekend, McCain has no problems keeping nearly everything the couple does own in her name:

http://www.huffingtonpost.c...

McCain Tax Returns: Latest News

John McCain has released his tax returns for 2006 and 2007 today, his first release of such information in 25 years. However, unlike the Democratic candidates who released information for themselves and their spouses, McCain will not release information on his wife's estimated $100 million fortune.

http://www.huffingtonpost.c...

McCain Continues To Use Wife's Corporate Jet

Cindy McCain said Thursday that she would never release her personal income tax filing even if her husband, Senator John McCain, was elected president. But Federal Aviation Administration records indicate that she appears to be using her personal wealth to help his campaign, through the continued use of her corporate jet.

The New York Times reported last month that during a crucial five-month period Mr. McCain's campaign regularly used a corporate jet owned by the Phoenix-based beer distributor that Mrs. McCain heads, saving the campaign hundreds of thousands of dollars. His campaign pays rates well below market ones for the plane's use because of an unresolved exemption in a recent campaign finance law that Mr. McCain backed.

Cindy McCain's Tax Returns Called For By Three Op-Eds

For a candidate who puts a premium on transparency and ethics, John McCain has been slow and grudging in releasing tax information. He did not commit to doing so until after he had secured the nomination, and then he disclosed only two years of taxes, far less than his Democratic rivals. Mr. McCain's wife, the heir to a liquor and beer distributorship, declined to release her returns, citing -- as Ms. Heinz Kerry did -- her children's privacy. Releasing tax information entails intrusion, but, as we wrote four years ago, presidential candidates and their spouses "relinquish a significant measure of privacy. Meanwhile, tax returns provide information not contained in financial disclosure forms, such as charitable contributions and the use of tax shelters." For Mrs. McCain to say, as she did on NBC's "Today" show this week, that she would never release her tax returns, not even if she were to become first lady, is unacceptable.

If taxes are not raised then we will just have to pass the growing debt to your children and grandchildren. I remember the "trickle down" theory about economics,still waiting for that one BTW.  

Read My Lips... 

No, BS, I want you to hold your breath like you said you would.

.

And McCain should follow through with *HIS* promise made before the November 2004 election, as to what he'd do if the Democrats retook Congress.

.

Let me say it again for you, Obama want to help everyone but the way he will do it is paid for by raising taxes.

Let me say it for you--Obama wants to help *SOME* by raising the taxes on others, who've gotten a huge undeserved tax break the past several years.  I find that fair.

for every single slam he makes on the republicans i can make 10 more on the democrats

The difference is that RF's would be based on actual facts, not something overheard on talk radio.

Sage,

We have had economic sauces with raising the GDP I think every year and we should continue that trend. We do have a debt but raising taxes would cause less money to made and less to be paid off. The way to fix our debt problem is to make more money, not by increasing taxes, but by selling more and earning more taxes all ready on the books. Not just raising the taxes so everyone who does buy pays more. I think that's basically it.

Think about it, you buy stuff, it cost more you might buy less. But if it cost less you buy more. I cant get more basic than that.

The economy did better under Clinton than under Bush, despite taxes being raised to pay for the insane Reagan/Bush1 deficits.  I can't get any more basic than that. 

Government was also smaller (i.e. less personnel)-the crux of the Republicans' argument for power in goverment.

Yeah, I think he was actually talking about Gates, who just last week suggested we have a sit down with Iran. How dare Obama assume it was about him.

Lets see. Huge surplus under Clinton, record debt under Bush.

28 bucks a barrell for oil under Clinton, 128 under Bush.

Real estate crash, a dollar is worth 67 cents in Europe, all our allies don't like us now, Bin Laden is still flipping the bird at the "Mission accomplished" guy who wouldn't even finish his military obligation flying planes over the dangerous Tuscaloosa Alabama area.

Spends 10 billion dollars a month policing another countries civil war, but won't spend 10 billion dollars....one time....to rebuild the levees in one of the most important ports in America.

4,000 of our military kids killed to fight people who didn't kill 3,000 other Americans under Bush, another 40,000 maimed, and record suicides by military personell. Clinton helped straighten out Bosnia with little US casualties.

Exxon makes record profits under Bush while we pay 4 bucks a gallon, then doesn't even know we are paying 4 bucks a gallon.

Half of his administration left in disgrace, or quit in disgust. The other half are cronies he owes favors too.

Worse President in U.S. History.......by far.  Well, he did refrain from getting a blowjob from an intern, but then again, what intern would want to do a guy who looks and acts like Alfred E Newman.

S&P 500 profits (excluding oil companies) lowest in ten years.   

If Obama wins, we lose the war, not only in Iraq.  We lose the war on terror.   I don't want the war to continue for 100 years, and neither does McCain, but, for heaven's sake...

Let's End the War (By Winning it)
Dr BLT copyright 2007
http://www.drblt.net/music/...

The war is over, BLT.  If Obama wins, we win the occupation by ending it.

.

There is no war on terror.  McCain wants the war to continue five more years (and 4000 more American deaths) before he'll admit it can't be won.  That's every bit as bad as 100 years, because the country can't afford either one.

Pssssssst. The terrorist is in Pakistan Doc. The Iraqis had nothing to do with 911. There were no WMDs, but Pakistan has them.....oh....and North Korea has a boatload, and missle technology. If we are going to take out despots one at a time, and it takes 100 years to straighten out each country after we invade ...well...you do the math.

 Pssssssst. The terrorist is in Pakistan Doc. The Iraqis had nothing to do with 911. There were no WMDs, but Pakistan has them.....oh....and North Korea has a boatload, and missle technology. If we are going to take out despots one at a time, and it takes 100 years to straighten out each country after we invade ...well...you do the math.

I intend to do the math, because your math appears to be a bit fuzzy at best.  Remember, Saddam was a weapon of mass destruction.  I said it in a song before the Republican candidates were saying it at the 2004 Republican convention, and it's as true now as it was then. 

PS BakersfieldSuperman rocks!  At last, common sense has come to the rescue. 

Saddam is about as much of a threat to us now as he was 6 years ago.

Tell that to the thousands of dead people with chemicals once all over their since decayed faces, or the ones who were shot in the back of the neck for disagreeing with Mr. Harmless. 

Please!  Are you telling us he was Santa Claus in disguise? 

Saddam was CIA in disguise...That's how he was able to use chemical warfare on his own people. The US was so afraid of USSR that he fought our wars by proxy against their puppets.

Please!  There is no Santa Claus, no WMD's, and no conscience currently in the Oval Office. 

Please read my post correctly Doc. "Saddam is about as much threat to us......."

But tell me, why are we then giving North Korea a pass, he's killed 10 fold more than Saddam. Why are we not in Africa where real genocide is occuring? Hmmmm. What are the connections between Bush and Saddam that had us choose him as despot of the day??? Was it because he allowed al queda to roam in Iraq? No. Was it because he flew planes into our buildings, No. Oh...it was because....uh......hell you tell me.

O h,
I 'd
L ike to make a guess at the reason...

I find it funny reading a blog post like this. Since the Republican Party has absolutely no plan to benefit working people in this country, and have not had a plan for many years now, the only thing left is to distract voters with smear campaigns. There is no plan for health care from Republicans. There is no jobs or economic stimulus plan that does not further reward the very wealthiest in the land by proposing yet another tax cut to wipe away vital services the lower 90% of earners use for basic survival. The only beneficiaries of the Bush tax cuts thus far have been the very rich. We are still the only major country in the world that allows its citizens to go into bankruptcy over an illness or accident. Republicans tout a strong defense and yet turn their backs on the promises made to the very soldiers they give lip service to. They vote to deny real GI benefits by blocking the latest Congressional proposal to bring the GI Bill up to date. The only thing Republicans have demonstrated a talent for is the smear campaign. After hearing NPR today with Republican strategists taking a beating from callers in their own Party over how out of touch with reality Republican ideology is today, it is no wonder the nation sees only dirt being thrown from a bunch of desperate small-minded individuals.  Republicans are not a party, they are a wake.

AdAM PAYNE:There is a plan, go to McCain's website, if you need any explanation let me know, I'd be more than happy to explain the proposals or principals.

Also it is insulting to not only me but many others in this nation when you make accusations against Republicans as a whole based on nothing but your own bias

RF, lol yeah you guessed it we are their for the oil, we are just letting OPEC rape us for cover..... if this nation was as you believe it to be we would have just killed a bunch of innocent Iraqi's and taken the oil by now. Hell it would probably be only 50 cents a gallon if that were true, unless a Dem was in charge then it would 3.50 with tax.....

" it is no wonder the nation sees only dirt being thrown from a bunch of desperate small-minded individuals. "   

And you see no part being played in this game by either Clinton or Obama?

McCain's health care plan is the best of all.  Clinton's is a government-coerced insult, and Obama's plan skips over the people who need it most.

Spam code DNCMS

for every single slam he makes on the republicans i can make 10 more on the democrats

The difference is that RF's would be based on actual facts, not something overheard on talk radio.

WHAT ARE YOU..RF'S ALTER EGO?? WHERE DOES HE GET HIS FACTS?? IS HE SLEEPIN AT YOBAMAS HOUSE AND EATTING AT HIS TABLE TO GET HIS INFO?? THAT HAS GOT TO BE ONE OF THE MOST CHILD LIKE RESPONSES I'VE READ IN ALONG TIME....

IF I MENTION SOMETHING THAT SOUNDS LIKE I DO..THE ONLY WAY YOU WOULD KNOW IS BECAUSE YOU FREQUENT THEM YOURSELF AND FEEL LIKE YOU ARE A SUPREME BEAN AND HAVE A RIGHT TO GET DOWN ON OTHERS??  NOT!!!!

BY THE WAY I DONT LISTEN TO TALK RADIO BUCKO.. OR ANY RADIO FOR THAT MATTER..MUCH BETTER SOURCES ON THE INTERNET..YA MIGHT WANNA TRY IT SOMETIME.

BS, if we spent the past 7 years and $500,000,000,000 on alternative energy, do you think oil would still be $128 bbl? Do you think we'd still be importing as much from OPEC? (Oh, and if we spent the past 7 years in ANWR, we'd still be at least 8 years from it being productive, and it will never be anything more than 5% of current US consumption.) Oh, and we'd have 4,000+ kids walking around today who are six feet under.
 

You're assuming the plan was to invade Iraq to increase oil production. That was only one of the plans- that the US would develop the Iraqi oil fields and break the back of OPEC. Rookie mistake. You see, the other plan was to invade Iraq and have US companies sign contracts to develop the fields but then not put them into production. That way they would get the increased profits (as they would with Plan 1) while doing absolutely no work at all. Sure, OPEC is still in power, but with the Iraq oil fields firmly in the hands of the US, we could do that another day, another decade.

BS, is right.

The above post is an autobiographical analogy on the author's:

1) knowledge of the subject matter, and;

2) Political proclivities.

~The Author

Siouxcity:

The poster you inquire after is but a part of the  "New Messiah of Messianic Misogyny" and "Let's Elect an Untouchable PC Straw Man Mythology".....

Don't you  "get" it yet???? 

Oh yes and everybody else has no "political proclivities"? Please. Note,cutsie terms abound all around~ why is it so easy to lower the level of discussion by such? And" At last, common sense has come to the rescue." is my absolute favorite of all the clever put downs(no offense BLT) but it is just irrefutable~ isn't it?

Unbelievable. They are actually calling random phone numbers in primary states urging them to get out the vote.

 

In the last week I've received 2 calls from Kevin McCarthy's phone team.  ON MY CELL PHONE !   This is the first time I've ever had political or telemarketing calls on that phone and I am extremely displeased.  I'm not a cell phone expert but I'm told that incoming calls use up my minutes and that REALLY ticks me off as I'm on a family members plan and the minutes are shared.

I disconnect as soon as I hear the voice but what about voice mail?  Anyone know how that works...eats into minutes available?  Not?

Sage, are you referring to the "Yobama" crack?  I re read the page and that's the only  "cutesy" name I saw.  And I disapprove of it too.  Sorry Sioux,  when you use it you make our side look as bad as the other.

Well I hate to wave red at the bull this early but some of Chico's terms may soar nearer to poetry than cutsie...and the conversation stopper "at last common sense saves ..." that one is my personal pet peeve.I may not agree with what say ,BLT< says but to imply that all other opinions are less than "common sense"....well if one considers what passes for common sense these days,that could be quite the insult..*giggles* for some reason i appear to be unable to take stuff so seriously this morning.

Sage..I agree that giggles are appropriate this morning.  I'm not wont to take much seriously either.  And Chic veered far from "cutesy" with his comment.  That's one of those "makes ya go huh" statements.  Whudda he say?  :-)

Saddam was also on the verge of changing his oil sales from dollars to Euros to combat the "food for oil" embargo placed on his nation, He would of started a revolt in the middle east and that`s not on the BushCo agenda for profits for buddies, War has the highest profit margin, So let`s do war !!! and the profits ARE rolling in.....

OK OK I GET IT..sorry Im suffering from an over exposure of irratants these days of which 'OBAMA HUSSEINS" camp is on the top of my list at the moment..

Nancy can I use 'YOBAMA INSANE' like they used to do for 'SO DAM INSANE'..OK smack me upside  the head..I couldnt resist. ;-)