Just in case you missed it 15 of 18 Iraqi benchmark have been met, I want to cut his off because Barack wont concede or recognize that

No, BS, as we pointed out earlier, that is absolutely not true--and, since we pointed it out, you *KNOW* that's not true.

.

But all you have left are lies.

.

Jackson's remarks will bring another surge of voters to Obama's campaign--as Jackson intended.  Fox really is *SO* predictable.

RF,

Foxnews reporting that a major public figure says he wants to cut someone's balls off...yup who would have thought they would do that. I mean really if i was a major news network i probably would have had to get about 25-30 people and have meeting after meeting to decide if that is news, but look at fox....they had it up there the same day like they predictable bunch they are.

~Ace

Actually, BS, I think JJ said he wanted to cut off Baracks "nuts."  LOLOLOL

I know.  Jackson and Obama were counting on it.  Like the reflexive defensiveness that McBush shows now whenever anyone even *MENTIONS* his military career.  (He'd have made reverse ace if he'd lost one more plane...)

I think John Kerry now wishes he hadn't had anything to do with the military.  He should have pulled a George W. Bush.  If he had, he may have become President of the United States. 

McBush's legendary temper can't stay bottled up too much longer.  Someone's going to ask him just the right question, and he's going to attack someone physically, on-camera.  Maybe the media will even run it.

Kerry ran so as not to lose.  Obama's going for the jugular.

McBush?   I think you mean McKennedy.  Over the years he's been in government, he's been more cozy with the Ted Kennedys of the world than the George W. Bush's.  I don't have a problem with it.  He's diplomatic, and not divisive.  He's non-partisan, but he still has backbone, and yes, if you get in his face, there's going to be hell to pay.  Hot tempers are not good things, in general, but those who have them are generally also very passionate about the things they believe in. 

Why do republicans like to have really bad pilots be their nominee for POTUS? I guess it's better than letting them actually fly.

I don't believe the Dems have ever had a pilot in the White House. They had a PT Boat commander for awhile, but his brains ended up splattered all over the back seat of a Lincoln.

McBush?   I think you mean McKennedy. 

Get with the program.  That was *LAST* year's McBush.  Today's "Jukebox John" McBush never strays an inch from the shrubbery. 

If McBush were anything like Kennedy, he'd have showed up for the Medicare vote.  Instead of hiding.  Again.

Tote 'em up for me woodja?  How many Democrats ever occupied the White House and also served in the military?  Any branch.    I could google it but it's too hot and I'm too lazy.  Besides, I have to go put in my 4 1/2 hours of work this evening and that makes it a rough day.

Doesn't break 'em down by party, but

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Random, Jackson didn't intend anything; he's not that intelligent. He was caught, plain and simple. CNN's Wolf Blitzer was the first  to report this story, 2 1/2 hours before O'Reilly came on the air.

Jackson doesn't like Obama because Obama wants to leave "the angry black man" back in the 1960s and head on to the future, whereas Jackson expects every black candidate to carry the same baggage that he chose to. In a nutshell, Jackson expects Obama to be a black candidate, while Obama has demonstrated that he intends to run as a candidate who is black. Big difference.

I think I've figured it out - BS cannot be a day over 16. 

What is the result?  There are people who'd much rather Jackson was running instead of Obama.  Jackson's one of them.  None of them will vote for McBush no matter what.

There are people who wouldn't vote for Obama if they thought Jackson was friendly with him.  They now know otherwise, courtesy of FoxNews, which feeds them *ALL* their imaginary knowledge.  All of them would have voted for McCain.   Some, now, might not.

Couple that with McBush's economic policy of "it's all in your heads, you whiners" and it's not a good week for the old guy.

I count nine Democrats with military service: Andy Jackson, James Polk, Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, Harry Truman, JFK, LBJ, and Jimmy Carter.

There are 14 Republicans: Lincoln, Grant, Hayes, Garfield, Arthur, Harrison, McKinley, Teddy Roosevelt, Ike, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, George the First and George the Second.

That includes stateside, militias, and reserves. How many actually in combat? That list is  bit shorter.

To date, we've had 18 Republicans and 14 Democrats, since the parties were established. So the percentages are pretty close in terms of who served and who didn't. And like WWII, the Civil War produced a long string of servicemen/Presidents: Grant through McKinley were all Civil War vets. (That's seven straight.)

WWII produced eight straight.

Jackson is angry because Obama talked about "black fathers being AWOL" instead of blaming the 75% illegitimacy rate in the black community on white oppression. It is part of Obama's move to the center, which any candidate must do if they're going to get elected (even Bush, with his "compassionate conservatism" sales pitch, was able to fool enough voters in 2000 into seeing him as somewhat of a centrist). Jackson, being a member of the more divisive "old guard," has seen himself be replaced by the "new guard," who are more into unity than divisiveness. Jackson sees these new blacks as sellouts - being part of the system rather than being held back by it.

The thing that rankles Jackson the most is seeing Obama at the doorstep of the presidency, and thinking, "There but for the passage of a few years go I." Instead of getting out of the way and allowing Obama to follow his own dreams and plot his own strategy, Jackson allows his ego to override his common sense and he makes asinine statements like the one we've been discussing on this board for two days.

"But all you have left are lies."

Hmmm.  BS's post about the 17 flip flops of Ali BaBarack Hussein yesterday had several comments by you and it didn't look like any of them pointed out even the slightest bit of evidence that BakersfieldSuperman was lying.  Saying that all he has left is lies would in *FACT* be the lie. By you.

"Jackson's remarks will bring another surge of voters to Obama's campaign--as Jackson intended" 

LOL!  And just where is this surge coming from?  The bitter clingers of Appalachia?  Probably from the headstones of Chicago area cemetaries. 

He should do a press conference with Michael Richards supporting him.

Following Iran’s missile tests this week, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) slammed Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-IL) position on the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, declaring, “This is the same organization that I voted to condemn as a terrorist organization when an amendment was on the floor of the United States Senate. Senator Obama refused to vote.”

The problem with the critique? McCain also missed that vote on the Kyl-Lieberman amendment on September 26, 2007. Records show that Obama was in New Hampshire and McCain was in New York instead of being in the Senate chamber for the vote in question.

Indeed, McCain — the most absent Senator — has missed more than 60 percent of the votes in the 110th Congress.

BS isn't the only liar on the right.

TSM give me a break, Barack obama said he supported welfare reform, it was his big TV Ad buy for he General election in Battle ground states, He lied, not only wasn't he apart of welfare reform he out right was against it, why? because his big left supporters  in Chicago like the welfare state.

he's a big liar too right? No because when Obama lies it just distractions and the mean conservatives right? TSM I would love to meet you personally, I wonder what type of life you lead, I wonder if your paid by the Moveon to spread their crap,

Don't call me liar, don't mention me, don't think about me. Just because you have been taken advantage by the Left and are unable to think for yourself, you do not need to insult me.

You have never been right about anything on  here that has to do with politics and the fact that the only poster that ever agrees with you is The biggest tool for the left on here should tell you some thing.

Okay, here was your point # 6:

CHANGE #6: Barack Obama Has Shifted From Opposing Welfare Reform To Celebrating Welfare Reform In A Television Ad

In His Newest Television Ad, Barack Obama Touts His Role In Slashing Welfare Rolls, But Leaves Out That He Was Against The 1996 Federal Legislation That Enacted Welfare Reform. “Barack Obama aligned himself with welfare reform on Monday, launching a television ad which touts the way the overhaul ’slashed the rolls by 80 percent.’ Obama leaves out, however, that he was against the 1996 federal legislation which precipitated the caseload reduction.” (Teddy Davis and Gregory Wallace, “Obama Shifts On Welfare Reform,” ABC News’ “Political Radar” Blog, http://blogs.abcnews.com, Posted 7/1/08)

In 1997, Barack Obama Said He Would Have Probably Not Supported Federal Welfare Reform Legislation. “‘I am not a defender of the status quo with respect to welfare,’ Obama said on the floor of the Illinois state Senate on May 31, 1997. ‘Having said that, I probably would not have supported the federal legislation, because I think it had some problems.’” (Teddy Davis and Gregory Wallace, “Obama Shifts On Welfare Reform,” ABC News’ “Political Radar” Blog, http://blogs.abcnews.com, Posted 7/1/08)

Let's look at that statement: “‘I am not a defender of the status quo with respect to welfare,’ Obama said on the floor of the Illinois state Senate on May 31, 1997. ‘Having said that, I probably would not have supported the federal legislation, because I think it had some problems.’"

Unfortunately the full Senate transcript is a secured PDF so the text cannot be copied. However, it can be read, and if you want the full scope of it, start at page 40. First, Obama is praised for his work on creating a better bill by a fellow Senator. Following that, Mr. Obama speaks, and there you'll find exactly what problems Mr. Obama had with the bill, both at the Federal and State level, as being inadequate in terms of job training, job creation, and the like. He also had problems with the Illinois bill and its treatment of *legal* immigrants, as well as metrics to measure the success or lack thereof on the progress of the reforms. He concludes his statement with, "Nevertheless, I think this is a good start, and I urge support of this bill."

The ABC News blog gets this story just flat wrong. Period. As is BS.

BS, Dr. Phil would love to have you on his show.

You have a textbook case of delusionary, or fixed false belief disorder.

Chico could join you since he suffers from the same malady, among other disorders.

I'm at a loss....Jackson screwed up...and where is Brother Sharpton....oh, the person that screwed up is black...so it's o.k. then....good church going folks my eye...