|
Obama camp lies about Daddy Yankee endorsement because Daddy Yankee likes McCain more Bill Clinton all but endorses McCain, saying Obama can't deliver The Surge Worked call Obama and tell him Question for the Democrats in the room Yeah the guy is a racist but its ok, he supports Obama Is Obama really going to leave Clinton with no hope Obamas going to Denver Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid questioned McCAin on Temperment Negitive Obama Makes Me Mad, now this house stuff I got 5 On it... January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
It doesn't work and I just read a great post on it,. I just wanted to add that if some got their way, and this were a socialist country things like this blog would not exist. This website and all others are direct results of a capitalistic society, much like all other innovations that we enjoy today. Go Socialism...oh wait no Socialism sucks I responded to some inquires to my last post "Come on Over", their was some questions and comments I had to respond to. Anywasy I also wanted to say congrats to the Dem with the great win by Clinton today. Once again Clinton has shown why she is the strongest to fight McCAin in the General. She might just steal this nom yet.... Lets face it both the Dems lie to you to get your support. Their both are unqualified to Pres and not only that, but as we speak they are talking about making the biggest tax increases ever, abandoning Iraq no matter the consequences, making health care a government run enterprise since it did so well with welfare, social security, and the post office.lol.... Look I just wanted to remind you that if you want an honest American that just wants to serve us as President you can vote McCain, Yeah sure he doesn't want to raise taxes and he doesn't support socialism that has literally ruined every single nation that has ever adopted it, Oh and he doesn't talk with the leaders of terrorist groups(Hamas) like Carter or for that matter doesn't have friends that are terrorists or racists like Obama oh and doesn't pretend to be shot at by people we are war with like Clinton He actually was tortured by them for 5 years. Anyways you guys are more than welcome to vote McCain. -BakoSup Man this was great. Both Clinton and Obama made the case that the other is wrongs and lies. lol they are right of course but the best part is when the next day that you see stories of people mad that they asked questions regarding what everyone wants to know. The winner was John McCain hands down So a kid (16 year old)tries to kill a cop by hitting him with a car he stole. I'm sure you guys heard about this. The cops killed him because they thought he was reaching for a gun. Anyway so on the news, they do a story about it and then they advertise the information of a bank account this kids mother made for his funeral. Let me get this strait, so this kid tries to kill a cop by hitting him with a stolen car, then this greedy mother makes a bank account, then the news show the story and tries to get people to donate for this kids funeral. WTF is wrong with this picture. How do you justify that crap. Oh yeah let me donate to this family its way more important that any charity....Christ this kills me I'm saddened by how horrible of a mother this woman was, Now she feels like that the public should pay for his death. He tried to kill a cop with a stolen car, what a horrible woman. It makes me sick..
I saw the Clinton drinking stuff where she had crown and a beer. Let me ask you what should your candidate be drinking? I like McCain and Budweiser. You? Yeah Obama called some people bitter, Clinton jumped on him yada yada yada... When are the Dems going to pick someone, so McCain can hurry up and lock up the Presidency? Its interesting to see Obama not getting the pass as much anymore. Its seems since they actually started to ask qeustions of Obama and he actually has to say what he talking about. You know past saying hope and unify, and now theres a controvercy everytime he opens his mouth. Is that how it seems to you guys or is that jsut my bias? Seriously is it just me or does it seem like Obama is now starting to get hammered because he actually has to articulate his elitist and socialist views?
The Mayor Villaraigosa accused federal officials of targeting "established, responsible employers" in industries that rely on "workforces that include undocumented immigrants." "In these industries, including most areas of manufacturing, even the most scrupulous and responsible employers have no choice but to rely on workers whose documentation, while facially valid, may raise questions about their lawful presence," he wrote in the March 27 letter.
I don't know where you guys stand with illegal immigration. But the Mayor here is saying only get the ones that have employers that don't give illegals American pay and rights. It get me pretty upset. I want all illegals to be kicked out and made to come legally. This guy won't even call them illegal. He calls them undocumented immigrants. Just a reality check for the Mayor, employers have plenty of choice. Look at Arizona, the employers choose not to hire them, so their not breaking the law and forced to pay fines. Anyways this kind of stuff infuriates me, anyone else.... I posted the McCain footage of the misqouted 100 years war qoute, and Obama lieing about it on the news...anyways this is what he sent me...I changed the parts highlighted
"thanks for postin this BakersfieldSup, you know im behind mccain all the way. I cant stand obama and that hilary w****, they are both f***in idiots who do nothing but make promises that they will never be able to honor, if you ever see mccain tell him the my navy friends name would gladly redeploy for th entire length of his presidency just so long as he wins, cuz i wont serve under those other a**holes. Just thougth I would share that with you guys, the feeling is pretty strong in th Military
Alright I was just wondering. Near the beginning of the campaign, McCain and Obama said if they were the nominees they would both take public Financing. Well now fast forward, it looks like Obamas words are biting him in butt. You see he made the remarks because he was losing to Clinton at the time and trying to establish his own image. One he did create. Well now the man who wants to unite everyone and break out of old style politics and bring hope is caught in a bad place. He has to make a choice. Will he keep his promise to accept the Public Financing or will he go back on his promise is say "screw that, I got lots of money!" What should he do, what do you think? I'll tell you if McCain takes public Financing and Obama doesn't it will be interesting to see how Obama explains that he's not keeping this promise but assuring everyone he meant all his other promises. You guys better hope Clinton steals it she would do better against Obama, oh wait if she wins that would mean she stole it right? Man Dems are screwed this in this race lol
Posted: 10:15 AM ET
The McCain campaign takes aim at Obama.
(CNN) — John McCain's campaign is seizing on Barack Obama’s comments Tuesday night deriding the public financing system for presidential campaigns. A senior McCain adviser calls it the latest signal that the Democratic candidate may abandon a promise to participate in the system, should he become the Democratic nominee. “It seems he is taking another step down the path of breaking his promise to the American people,” said McCain adviser Steve Schmidt. “Obama is running an increasingly negative campaign built on a foundation of untruthful attacks and broken promises. That is the type of politics Americans are sick of and John McCain is going to change.” At a fundraiser Tuesday night, Obama told donors that “we have created a parallel public financing system where the American people decide if they want to support a campaign they can get on the Internet and finance it, and they will have as much access and influence over the course and direction of our campaign that has traditionally reserved for the wealthy and the powerful."
Participating in the public financing system limits a candidate’s ability to spend campaign cash. McCain has promised to accept public funding only if his opponent does the same. For the McCain campaign, criticizing Obama on this issue serves two purposes. First, it serves to undermine Obama’s reformer message, which is the same theme McCain is running on, and gives them a means of painting the Illinois senator as a typical, untrustworthy politician. “Barack Obama publicly promised the American people that he would accept public financing if he is the nominee of his Party," said McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds. "Launching his campaign by going back on a promise to voters would be dishonest, and exposes his ‘politics of hope’ as empty rhetoric out of a typical politician.” On a more practical level, it’s in McCain’s interest to push Obama to take public financing because the presumptive GOP nominee raises nowhere near as much money as Obama. Last month was one of McCain’s best in terms of fundraising — he pulled in $15 million. But over the course of the year to date, he has raised less than the $40 million that Obama did in the last month alone. Last week, McCain's campaign returned $3 million in funds received from major donors towards general election expenses, and encouraged them to send the money to the Republican National Committee's Victory Fund instead — one of the strongest signals to date he intends to participate in the public financing system, which prohibits him from receiving those donations from individuals who have already contributed the $2,300 primary season maximum. McCain first went after Obama on this issue in February, after Obama wrote an op-ed in USA Today proposing a "meaningful agreement in good faith that results in real spending limits.” Then, McCain called that “Washington double-speak” and challenged the Democrat to keep what he calls a promise to participate in the public financing system. The Obama campaign responded by accusing McCain of abandoning new efforts at campaign finance reform, a McCain signature issue. _________________________________________________ ____________________ Just goes to show you that Obama didn't just start lieing, it happened a long time ago I presented you the actual video that is used to misrepresent McCain by saying he wants war for a hundred years. WHen he clearly said that America can have a prensence theirer like we have one now in Japan, korea etc...(To libs We had wars in those areas) Tom W I liked the song but after listening to McCain actually saying what he did at the town hall meeting can you or anyone like you tell me that you think McCAin wants to be in war for 100 years? I wonder have you been so brain washed and told to hate Republicans so many times that you can not believe what you see and hear with your own eyes and ears? I mean seriously watch the video...go ahead http://www.youtube.com/watc... If you watch this and still think McCAin wants war for One hundred years Ill vote for whoever you want. Deal? Just think as you watch, of Clinton and Obama feeding you the line of how McCain want war, when its so obvious what he said. What else do they mis_represent and lie about?
Ok so this morning on the morning show Obama is confronted about making up what John McCAin said. The infamous 100 years qoute that Obama and other democrats are trying to use to misrepresent what mCain said. check it on you tube..nothing tells teh truth like video. McCain's 100 year qoute <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VF... name="wmode" value="transparent"></param>&l t;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VF..." type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></obje ct> http://www.youtube.com/watc... Here's Obama lieing about it <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ez... name="wmode" value="transparent"></param>&l t;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ez..." type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></obje ct> http://www.realclearpolitic...>http://www.youtube.com/watc...
After watching these two videos you cant tell me Obama isn't blantanly and outright lieing. Hell even can't even stay consist with what hes been saying. first it was I'll get em out as fast as possible, then 16 months now well depending about 16 months...lol this is great I think people are starting to realize that pretty much everything he has been doing is a lie. or at the very least a hopeful but dishonest thought. I like the way he talked down to "Merideth" too. very classy.
Isn't this the second time someone cam, out and attacked McCAin and Obama's staff has come out against it? Is there any thing to the fact that Obama himself won't say that it was wrong? That he won't confront a Democrat that play waht he calls "old stlye politics", You know what I call disrepectful and personallyattacking some one.
Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., has apologized for comments he made about Sen. McCain that were reported in the Charleston Gazette: "McCain was a fighter pilot, who dropped laser-guided missiles from 35,000 feet. He was long gone when they hit. "What happened when they [the missiles] get to the ground? He doesn't know. You have to care about the lives of people. McCain never gets into those issues." Rockefeller called McCain to apologize, and released the following statement: "I have deep respect for John McCain's honorable and noble service to our country. I made an inaccurate and wrong analogy and I have extended my sincere apology to him.... I regret my very poor choice of words." The Obama camp has also distanced itself from these statements: "Senator Obama has a deep respect for Senator McCain's service to this country and doesn't agree with what Senator Rockefeller said." Check it out CLinton again just makes up, I mean misrepresents what is said, its toward the bottom.....
The GOP’s presidential nominee John McCain (R.-Ariz.) and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton (D.-N.Y.) squared off on Iraq policy against the backdrop of a high-profile hearing to receive testimony from senior Iraq officials Tuesday. In the run-up to the hearing, McCain said removing troops from Iraq too early could threaten security at home and Clinton said in a television interview “the surge hasn’t worked.” Both of these charges played out in more dramatic form during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, a committee both Clinton and McCain are members. At a campaign stop in Kansas City Monday McCain said it was the “height of irresponsibility” and a “failure of leadership” for Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama (D.-Ill), also campaigning for the Democratic nomination, to promise to they would withdraw troops from Iraq upon being elected President. As top Republican on Armed Services committee, McCain delivered an opening statement to Army General David H. Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker. In it, he strongly criticized those supporting a premature withdrawal from Iraq. “Should the United States instead choose to withdraw from Iraq before adequate security is established, we will exchange for this victory a defeat that is terrible and long lasting. Al Qaeda in Iraq would proclaim victory and increase its efforts to provoke sectarian tensions, pushing for a full scale civil war that could descend into genocide and destabilize the Middle East,” McCain said. “Iraq would become a failed state that could become a haven for terrorists to train and plan their operations. Iranian influence would increase substantially in Iraq and encourage other countries to seek accommodation with Tehran at the expense of our interests. And American failure would almost certainly require us to return to Iraq or draw us into a wider and far costlier war." As a lower-ranking member of the Armed Services committee, Clinton was allotted just six minutes to speak and pose questions to the General and the Ambassador. She used part of that time to respond to McCain. “Suggestions have been made leading up to this hearing and even during it, that it is irresponsible or demonstrates a lack of leadership to advocate withdrawing troops from Iraq in a responsible and carefully planned withdrawal,” Clinton said. “I fundamentally disagree. Rather, I think it could be fair to say that it might well be irresponsible to continue the policy that has not produced the results that have been promised time and time again at such tremendous cost to our national security and to the men and women who wear the uniform of the United States military.” Clinton maintained President Bush’s decision to send a “surge” of troops to Iraq has not produced the needed political results. Because she is unsatisfied with political progress, Clinton told ABC’s Robin Roberts, “Clearly the surge hasn’t worked” in a television interview earlier that morning. In her question and answer session with Clinton charged, “Even General Petraeus as recently as three and a half weeks ago has acknowledged that the Iraqi government has not made sufficient political progress.” Clinton made this statement based on an article published in the Washington Post. Petraeus corrected Clinton. “What I said [in the article] was that no one was satisfied with the progress that had been made, either Iraqis or Americans, but I then went on and actually ticked off a number of the different areas in which there had been progress and talked about the different laws that Ambassador Crocker has rightly identified in a number of other areas in which, in fact, there's been progress, although not satisfactory progress,” Petraeus said. “That was the thrust of what I was getting at there” Petraeus said. The full article is available here. For anyone that missed this, I wanted to post it again, this what someone put as a reason to not vote McCain...check it out He doesn't understand any portion of the economy. good one what else? He will increase Govt. debt. he will? that's bad He will increase Govt. spending. wait a minute isn't this assumed with the above? He's sick and dying. Yep that evil man He sold out to the Vietnamese for better treatment. Duh I knew that He doesn't believe the CIA's explanation of blowback, but wants to increase their budget. That right that animal He's pro-illegal invasion. how clever he said invasion instead of immigration Pro-Patriot Act. Pro-endless and continual war with the country of the week. McCain's what!!??!!!?!?!? He's pro-income tax. loves taxes? He's pro-federal reserve, DHS, Real-ID. real ID too? He's anti-free market. Hates citizens and loves starving them with sanctions, whatever country they may be in. seriously now the lies are just too much, so hard to continue He just violated his own campaign finance rule. My god you would think someone would arrest him He's anti-1st/2nd/4th amendment. Actually, it doesn't even sound like he's read the Constitution. Never read the constitution? Ron Paul continually made him look like a decrepit, old, ignorant geezer in public, on TV and handed him his arse on a plate. Ron Paul wait a minute I thought you were talking about how bad McCain was Corporate corruption ie; fascist. He's a fascist, my god 100 years was the minimum number he actually threw out, it was more to the effect, as long as "it" takes. Being that the biggest embassy ever is being constructed in Iraq, I hear that as permanent occupation. Which is followed up perfectly with: Hold on your about to really lay it on me know huh? ok Im ready, Im learning so much I didn't even know that our embassy's were where we control other countries....ok go He's pro-empirical occupation in all those countries around the world. look I ll be honest I don't even know what empirical means is that like pirates? He doesn't understand earmarks. Oh that's why he's never got one, he's stupid And last, he vacations with the Clinton's. He what!!! no way. really? vacations? what the hell
Ok I was going to just make remarks after everyone of this things and try to make it funny but I can't, sorry if you read it. Seriously I just can't believe this guy really thinks all that's true. This is where the Ron Paul guys lose me, anyone that is in favor of another candidate is automatically wrong, hates the country, a war monger, and has never read the constitution. Liberals, we just look at things different ad I disagree on basically everything you believe cause its bad for the country But at no time do I ever think you didn't read the constitution, or assume you hate America. The Ron Paul guys are nuts. they were at California and stockdale awhile back and I said you know when Ron Drops out you should vote McCain, they replied did you know McCain betrayed the US by taking better treatment and favors when he was a POW. Then said since I support him that I am betraying the country...this of course was a shock to me because its well known that McCain didn't take any sort of better treatment when offered and since I actually served my country in the Armed Service unlike this guy who made some crappy sign and blatantly lies about Americans, I was the traitor. Good post though whoever I copied the above crap from....keep it coming Here you go, you guys go ahead and continue the lies and mistruths you Lis liek to say Ill start it for you: 1. McCain wants to be at war for 100 years or 10000 2. McCain hates ______(add some group to encourage outrage) 3 Whatever other Liberal lie 4. Etc 5. lol I'm curious, I wonder what anyone can some up with as a reason not to be a McCain supporter. Please don't make submissions if it is just based on lies, misrepresentation of positions or any other just made up crap. Please try to only put down actual reasons. Don't put down made up stuff like Obama and Clinton say, for example that McCain wants to be at war in Iraq for 100 years etc...sorry RF and no one, I made a spacial thread for your kind of made up liberal lies and misrepresentations.... This blog is for a serious conversation based on fact and truth...
Air America is a Liberal radio Org and the a host, Rhodes, said: "Geraldine Ferraro turned out to be the David Duke in drag. Who knew?” Rhodes said to laughter. “What a whore Geraldine Ferraro is, she’s such a f*****g whore.” A few minutes later, Rhodes said”Hillary is a big f*****g whore too.” She then suggested Clinton was trying to force her way into the Democratic nomination by manipulating pledged delegates. “Oh, f**k you, okay, f**k you,” Air America said: "Air America encourages strong opinions about public affairs but does not condone such abusive, ad hominem language by our Hosts,” hmm really, thats what you guys are about? ok well then this was said: Rhodes also went on a rant about having “an anti-Semite racist in the White House like Nixon or Ronald Reagan or Dick Cheney.” Recently scandalized New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer also faced Rhodes’ wrath. So theres just one more think Last October, Rhodes, whose program airs on Air America weekdays from 3-6 p.m. ET, was beaten in an apparent mugging while walking her dog near her home in New York City. At the time, another Air America anchor, Joe Elliott, blamed “the right-wing hate machine” but was forced to retract the statement. Air America also issued a statement at the time, saying Rhodes “experienced an unfortunate incident hindering her from hosting the show. The reports of a presumed hate crime are unfounded.”
Clinton lied to you, out right lied....sniper fire in Bosnia Obama lied to you about knowing his preachers racist and anti America, conspiracy theories....he said he never knew about it in his 20 years at Trinity, then in his speech he admitted it and said it was no big deal. He still says your church probably Had something similar preached their. Yeah obama my preachers always says the racist bigoted crap your adviser said. oh wait no they don't... John McCain on the other hand says the surge has been working because of decreased violence, political success. Obama and Clinton call these lies because they think the war has been lost for like a year, according to their leader Reid... anyways just a reminder that the Dem's are liars... Look, I got two daughters — 9 years old and 6 years old,” he said. “I am going to teach them first about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby. I don’t want them punished with an STD at age 16, so it doesn’t make sense to not give them information.”
Seriously what is this? if they make a mistake they shouldn't be punished with a baby? this is wrong on so many levels, like why your kid having sex, why is it punishment, how is punishment seriously. Obamas nuts...this is who half of you libs want as President? Its bad enough hes a liar but seriously what in this guys head. |