|
New officers learning in the field Well that was lame Advice for the newbies Promotions Hey smack-talkers Awesomely bad TV alert Life in the spotlight Just an intermission Graduation story Question from a reader August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
When are they going to teach them to be jerks?
This was the question a friend posed to me recently. More of a challenge, actually.
She said the becoming a cop series had been nice and all, but when was I going to show how the cadets were going to go from being regular people to becoming jerks? When was I going to show how the department trains them to be mean and rude to everyone? Geez. How do I even begin to answer a question that is so loaded with bias and personal opinion? Well, one I can actually answer quickly. From what I've seen, they do not train them to be jerks. There is no 'Theories in Being Rude' course. They take every opportunity to train them to be professional and courteous. But I suspect that there a lot of people out there thinking something along the same lines as my friend. Sure, these guys SEEM nice now, but wait until they get out on the streets and don't have a reporter watching them. I intended to delve into this question in the Museum of Tolerance article. Since the cadets have never really been in the street interacting with public, I decided to ask the cops. I interviewed Lt. Cantrell, who heads up Internal Affairs, along with Training Officer Feola. I talked to Sgt. Mullins and Lt. Nuriddin about it too. But when I went to write the story, it just wasn't working. I was trying to shove a square issue into a round article. To stay true to the project, I cut the interviews with Cantrell and Feola completely, and really limited the stuff from Mullins and Nuriddin. But getting in the stuff there wasn't room for was the reason this blog was created. So I started to tackle the jerk question by trying to break down why my friend was asking it in the first place. There are dozens of examples throughout history and in the news today of cops grossly misusing power. You don't have to look far. Pretty soon the people of Kern County are going to have decide if three sheriff's department detentions deputies murdered an inmate. But was that why she was asking? Or was it because when she's had interactions with cops, she's found them to be curt and sort of bullies? "As Americans we don't like to be told what to do, and that's what the police do," Sgt. Joe Mullins said. Lt. Mike Cantrell agreed. The Internal Affairs department investigates all of the community's complaints about the BPD. In addition to the complaints that are potential violations of law, like excessive force, fabrication of evidence, filing a false report, illegal arrest and improper search, IA will investigate complaints of rudeness. "When people come in contact with authority, through some type of detention... a lot of people take exception to that," Cantrell said. Cantrell said that they will investigate those complaints, but often they are very difficult to prove or disprove. "Maybe an officer was curt to them, didn't seem interested in what the citizen was reporting, was indifferent. It could be a facial expression," Cantrell said. "It's just a feeling the citizen had in the contact with the officer." Regular citizens whose only contact with law enforcement is getting a traffic citation will often find that experience unfair and be unhappy with the officer. "The proper venue for that is traffic court. That's a fair shake for citizens," Cantrell said. How an officer interacts with someone, whether that person is a witness, suspect or a victim, is often determined by the behavior of the other person, not the cop, Officer Chris Feola said. "People have their own bias, their own opinions, their own views of what police officers should be," Feola said. "The citizens you contact dictate how you react to them." Historically the relationship between some police departments and some minority groups has been adversarial. Departments across the country have come under attack for their treatment of minorities at various times. Officers have often accused of racial profiling, or treating a minority person as a criminal simply because he is of a certain race. As recently as 2003, the BPD faced accusations of racial profiling and excessive force, which were investigated by the Department of Justice. The allegations could not be proved. While use-of-force and citizen complaint policy changes resulted from the investigation, the BPD is still struggling with an issue departments are facing nationwide. It is overwhelming white and male. At the end of October, the BPD had 319 sworn officers, and 298 were male and 261 were white. "We continually work to have an organization that's reflective of our community," said Lt. Hajir Nuriddin, who is a black woman. Mullins said that there is no correlation between the race of an officer, the race of a suspect, and the likelihood that excessive force will be used. "Race is very rarely an issue. It's usually a training issue, a leadership issue, a professional culture issue," Mullins said. Nuriddin said the department has been working to recruit more women and minorities by establishing community outreach programs like the Police Activities League. "The historical negative things that have happened in this profession, we still have some people of color who have not come into the department to see the changes that have been made," Nuriddin said. "It takes more than just a poster. It takes more than just a billboard." -- CS 13 comments from 8 users
1
posted by
Charlie
on Dec 4, 2006 at 06:21 PM
"At the end of October, the BPD had 319 sworn officers, and 298 were male and 261 were white." As bad as my math skills are, I believe 298 & 261 = 559 "Regular citizens whose only contact with law enforcement is getting a traffic citation will often find that experience unfair and be unhappy with the officer. Traffic court ? Give me a break here. The sole purpose of traffic court is to collect money. The traffic court judge will rubber stamp anything the officer says no matter how stupid or how big a lie it is. In many cases where the lie is so outrages, the judge will play the taking it under advisement game. This is where the judge sends the guilty verdict in the mail rather than make a fool out of the officer in open court. If you think traffic court is bad here in Bakersfield you should try observing it in some of the outlying areas like Ridgecrest. There is probably not a small town court system in the country that is as corupt as Ridgecrest. posted by
BecomingACop
on Dec 4, 2006 at 06:23 PM
posted by
ki6amd
on Dec 4, 2006 at 09:19 PM
I have a two way bias here, having been assaulted by a police officer, and having worked at the BPD. My opinion from time to time swings far to one side and the other. On one hand yes, I have seen police officers in bad times, but also in the good. For example, during this month in particular the BPD are involved in so many food drives, clothing drives, gift drives, etc. that they put most other local charities to shame. Charlie, traffic court is where you can plea not guilty and many times I have done just that, and without a lawyer, I have had the case excused. (Once I missed court and had the ticket dropped... out of pocket expense= $0). Also, Lt. Cantrell is a fair man. It seems you're blaming our BPD for the Court's problems. Arguing with a police officer will never get you out of a ticket. The judge decides if you're guilty, so trying to prove an officer is lying won't win you points with the judge, you need to prove that the officer was not in the wrong, and you are in the right. Yes that is possible. posted by
anonymous
on Dec 4, 2006 at 09:23 PM
Charlie, let me help you, since you seem to have trouble with reading comprehension... out of 319 officers, 298 are male. And out of the same 319 officers, 216 are white, regardless of gender. Does it make more sense now? No wonder the traffic court judge probably couldn't understand your arguement and foung you guilty!
posted by
TomW
on Dec 4, 2006 at 09:44 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Dec 4, 2006 at 10:10 PM
posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Dec 4, 2006 at 10:18 PM
posted by
TomW
on Dec 4, 2006 at 10:23 PM
posted by
anonymous
on Dec 4, 2006 at 10:31 PM
To ki6amd, I have a couple of comments for you to think about. In another blog you admit you worked at the police department as a teenager, so don't talk like you know what it's really like to be a law enforcement officer, because you don't. Being an explorer is not even close. And are you biased against certain officers becuse they arrested you during the course of their jobs?
posted by
Charlie
on Dec 4, 2006 at 10:44 PM
Anonymous foung me guilty ? Looks like your spelling is on par with my comprehension. And my opiinion on traffic court comes mostly from observation not participation. Did I make that clear enough for you to understand ?
posted by
dusty1215
on Dec 4, 2006 at 10:47 PM
posted by
ki6amd
on Dec 6, 2006 at 06:33 AM
I'm not angry with the BPD, I'm angry at Floyd. Sgt. Grimm showed up on scene to varify the damage he did (Sgt. Grimm is a friend of my family). Also, I was not an explorer, explorers are just an extension of the Boy Scouts. However, I did go on a few ride alongs and also sat in on the comm center from time to time. Should I also mention I received 2 citizen commendations in the short time I worked there? I am DAMN proud of the BPD, and damn proud to have worked there, and have defended the BPD 100% of the time, before Floyd. Do I still defend the police? You bet your ass I do. Reread what I said to Charlie! Do I know what it means to be a police officer first hand, no. Do I want to? No. Why? because I have seen first hand what life is like as a police officer. But I do respect those who choose it as a profession. But part of my anger comes from what happened to my cousin. I'll give you a clue... the guy who owns S&J Outdoor Power Equipment, why he no longer works at the BPD. Or knock on the door across the hall from the Comm Center and ask Lt. Cantrell why he dropped the charges on my cousin. And if you want to keep pushing, I'll post the pictures taken by BPD crime lab the morning after my surgery, since Floyd refused to take pictures before surgery. posted by
ki6amd
on Dec 6, 2006 at 06:46 AM
My reason for hating Floyd is because he doesn't represent the officers I know and trust, and I don't want him representing law enforcement in this town!
1
Advertisement |