Becoming A Cop
About BecomingACop


Member Since:
August 07, 2006
Last Signed In:
June 25, 2007
Profile Views:
4454
Blog Views:
14472
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
New officers learning in the field
Well that was lame
Advice for the newbies
Promotions
Hey smack-talkers
Awesomely bad TV alert
Life in the spotlight
Just an intermission
Graduation story
Question from a reader
Archives
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


BecomingACop - > Becoming A Cop -> When are they going to teach them to be jerks?
When are they going to teach them to be jerks?
This was the question a friend posed to me recently. More of a challenge, actually.

She said the becoming a cop series had been nice and all, but when was I going to show how the cadets were going to go from being regular people to becoming jerks? When was I going to show how the department trains them to be mean and rude to everyone?

Geez. How do I even begin to answer a question that is so loaded with bias and personal opinion?

Well, one I can actually answer quickly. From what I've seen, they do not train them to be jerks. There is no 'Theories in Being Rude' course. They take every opportunity to train them to be professional and courteous.

But I suspect that there a lot of people out there thinking something along the same lines as my friend. Sure, these guys SEEM nice now, but wait until they get out on the streets and don't have a reporter watching them.

I intended to delve into this question in the Museum of Tolerance article. Since the cadets have never really been in the street interacting with public, I decided to ask the cops. I interviewed Lt. Cantrell, who heads up Internal Affairs, along with Training Officer Feola. I talked to Sgt. Mullins and Lt. Nuriddin about it too.

But when I went to write the story, it just wasn't working. I was trying to shove a square issue into a round article. To stay true to the project, I cut the interviews with Cantrell and Feola completely, and really limited the stuff from Mullins and Nuriddin.

But getting in the stuff there wasn't room for was the reason this blog was created. So I started to tackle the jerk question by trying to break down why my friend was asking it in the first place.

There are dozens of examples throughout history and in the news today of cops grossly misusing power. You don't have to look far. Pretty soon the people of Kern County are going to have decide if three sheriff's department detentions deputies murdered an inmate.

But was that why she was asking? Or was it because when she's had interactions with cops, she's found them to be curt and sort of bullies?

"As Americans we don't like to be told what to do, and that's what the police do," Sgt. Joe Mullins said.

Lt. Mike Cantrell agreed. The Internal Affairs department investigates all of the community's complaints about the BPD. In addition to the complaints that are potential violations of law, like excessive force, fabrication of evidence, filing a false report, illegal arrest and improper search, IA will investigate complaints of rudeness.

"When people come in contact with authority, through some type of detention... a lot of people take exception to that," Cantrell said.

Cantrell said that they will investigate those complaints, but often they are very difficult to prove or disprove.

"Maybe an officer was curt to them, didn't seem interested in what the citizen was reporting, was indifferent. It could be a facial expression," Cantrell said. "It's just a feeling the citizen had in the contact with the officer."

Regular citizens whose only contact with law enforcement is getting a traffic citation will often find that experience unfair and be unhappy with the officer.

"The proper venue for that is traffic court. That's a fair shake for citizens," Cantrell said.

How an officer interacts with someone, whether that person is a witness, suspect or a victim, is often determined by the behavior of the other person, not the cop, Officer Chris Feola said.

"People have their own bias, their own opinions, their own views of what police officers should be," Feola said. "The citizens you contact dictate how you react to them."

Historically the relationship between some police departments and some minority groups has been adversarial. Departments across the country have come under attack for their treatment of minorities at various times. Officers have often accused of racial profiling, or treating a minority person as a criminal simply because he is of a certain race.

As recently as 2003, the BPD faced accusations of racial profiling and excessive force, which were investigated by the Department of Justice. The allegations could not be proved.

While use-of-force and citizen complaint policy changes resulted from the investigation, the BPD is still struggling with an issue departments are facing nationwide. It is overwhelming white and male.

At the end of October, the BPD had 319 sworn officers, and 298 were male and 261 were white.

"We continually work to have an organization that's reflective of our community," said Lt. Hajir Nuriddin, who is a black woman.

Mullins said that there is no correlation between the race of an officer, the race of a suspect, and the likelihood that excessive force will be used.

"Race is very rarely an issue. It's usually a training issue, a leadership issue, a professional culture issue," Mullins said.

Nuriddin said the department has been working to recruit more women and minorities by establishing community outreach programs like the Police Activities League.

"The historical negative things that have happened in this profession, we still have some people of color who have not come into the department to see the changes that have been made," Nuriddin said. "It takes more than just a poster. It takes more than just a billboard."

-- CS
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by BecomingACop on Monday, December 4, 2006 at 02:14 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 497 times
13 comments from 8 users

1

posted by Charlie on Dec 4, 2006 at 06:21 PM

"At the end of October, the BPD had 319 sworn officers, and 298 were male and 261 were white."

As bad as my math skills are, I believe 298 & 261 = 559

"Regular citizens whose only contact with law enforcement is getting a traffic citation will often find that experience unfair and be unhappy with the officer.
The proper venue for that is traffic court. That's a fair shake for citizens," Cantrell said."

Traffic court ? Give me a break here. The sole purpose of traffic court is to collect money. The traffic court judge will rubber stamp anything the officer says no matter how stupid or how big a lie it is. In many cases where the lie is so outrages, the judge will play the taking it under advisement game. This is where the judge sends the guilty verdict in the mail rather  than make a fool out of the officer in open court.  If you think traffic court is bad here in Bakersfield you should try observing it in some of the outlying areas like Ridgecrest.  There is probably not a small town court system in the country that is as corupt as Ridgecrest.

posted by BecomingACop on Dec 4, 2006 at 06:23 PM
Many are both white and male.
posted by ki6amd on Dec 4, 2006 at 09:19 PM
First off, let me say (as biased as I am), your friend is way off. Most (if not all) of the officers are some of the finest people you'll ever meet. (As long as you're not meeting them for the first time doing something wrong, being involved in something the police are being called to, or in my case fitting the profile of someone who was robbing stores downtown). I imagine if I met Officer "mother &^%$er" Floyd under other circumstances, I might be calling him Ryan.

I have a two way bias here, having been assaulted by a police officer, and having worked at the BPD. My opinion from time to time swings far to one side and the other. On one hand yes, I have seen police officers in bad times, but also in the good. For example, during this month in particular the BPD are involved in so many food drives, clothing drives, gift drives, etc. that they put most other local charities to shame.

Charlie, traffic court is where you can plea not guilty and many times I have done just that, and without a lawyer, I have had the case excused. (Once I missed court and had the ticket dropped... out of pocket expense= $0).

Also, Lt. Cantrell is a fair man. It seems you're blaming our BPD for the Court's problems. Arguing with a police officer will never get you out of a ticket. The judge decides if you're guilty, so trying to prove an officer is lying won't win you points with the judge, you need to prove that the officer was not in the wrong, and you are in the right. Yes that is possible.
posted by anonymous on Dec 4, 2006 at 09:23 PM
Charlie, let me help you, since you seem to have trouble with reading comprehension... out of 319 officers, 298 are male. And out of the same 319 officers, 216 are white, regardless of gender. Does it make more sense now? No wonder the traffic court judge probably couldn't understand your arguement and foung you guilty!
posted by TomW on Dec 4, 2006 at 09:44 PM
I have two coins whose combined value is 30 cents.  One is not a nickle.  What are they?
posted by randomfactor on Dec 4, 2006 at 10:10 PM
The way things are going, Tom, a shilling and a pence ought to do it. :)
posted by ProgressivePete2 on Dec 4, 2006 at 10:18 PM
A quarter and a nickel. One is not a nickel, but the other one is.
posted by TomW on Dec 4, 2006 at 10:23 PM
See, this stuff isn't hard.  Though I like the idea above that they only hired non-white men and white women as police officers.
posted by anonymous on Dec 4, 2006 at 10:31 PM
To ki6amd, I have a couple of comments for you to think about. In another blog you admit you worked at the police department as a teenager, so don't talk like you know what it's really like to be a law enforcement officer, because you don't. Being an explorer is not even close. And are you biased against certain officers becuse they arrested you during the course of their jobs?
posted by Charlie on Dec 4, 2006 at 10:44 PM

Anonymous

foung me guilty ?  Looks like your spelling is on par with my comprehension. And my opiinion on traffic court comes mostly from observation not participation. Did I make that clear enough for you to understand ?

 

posted by dusty1215 on Dec 4, 2006 at 10:47 PM
Charlie..I wouldn't be tossing stones about spelling...opinion..not opiinion.
posted by ki6amd on Dec 6, 2006 at 06:33 AM
    Anon, I was arrested for fitting the description of someone who was quite taller than me, wears glasses and has "jet black" hair. During the arrest I was accused of being a drug user. I asked Floyd to drug test me, and while in handcuffs he hit me several times, once in the face. He then pushed my face into the mesh screen behind the passenger's seat of the patrol car. My nose was cut in half and required surgery. I was able to take a blood drug test at KMC, and proved negative of any drugs! While in the downtown jail the guy I was accused of being robbed another store. And as I said in "another blog" post, I did not argue with Floyd.
 
    I'm not angry with the BPD, I'm angry at Floyd. Sgt. Grimm showed up on scene to varify the damage he did (Sgt. Grimm is a friend of my family). Also, I was not an explorer, explorers are just an extension of the Boy Scouts. However, I did go on a few ride alongs and also sat in on the comm center from time to time. Should I also mention I received 2 citizen commendations in the short time I worked there?

    I am DAMN proud of the BPD, and damn proud to have worked there, and have defended the BPD 100% of the time, before Floyd. Do I still defend the police? You bet your ass I do. Reread what I said to Charlie! Do I know what it means to be a police officer first hand, no. Do I want to? No. Why? because I have seen first hand what life is like as a police officer. But I do respect those who choose it as a profession.

    But part of my anger comes from what happened to my cousin. I'll give you a clue... the guy who owns S&J Outdoor Power Equipment, why he no longer works at the BPD. Or knock on the door across the hall from the Comm Center and ask Lt. Cantrell why he dropped the charges on my cousin. And if you want to keep pushing, I'll post the pictures taken by BPD crime lab the morning after my surgery, since Floyd refused to take pictures before surgery.
posted by ki6amd on Dec 6, 2006 at 06:46 AM
    The thing that pisses me off most is when little Anonymous people try acting like they know me or my situation, and proceed to tell me why I have the opinions I do, when they haven't even picked up a copy of the police report. Or worse haven't even checked CJIS for my name! If you had, you'd know you're words "And are you biased against certain officers becuse they arrested you during the course of their jobs?" are sorely incorrect. I'm biased because I was assaulted by a police officer on duty, and IA forwarded my case to the Assistant Chief, who gave it to his secretary to send me a canned message , saying nothing more than my case was looked at.

    My reason for hating Floyd is because he doesn't represent the officers I know and trust, and I don't want him representing law enforcement in this town!
1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement