|
Brothers' attorneys face contempt hearing Judge: Brothers deserves to die Jury recommends Brothers should receive the death penalty VERDICT IN DEATH PENALTY No Verdict This Week Jury begins deliberations in Brothers penalty phase Defense attorney finishes closing argument Defense continues closing argument Defense attorney begins his closing argument Prosecutor finishes closing argument February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Jury recommends Brothers should receive the death penalty
A jury decided Tuesday that Vincent Brothers should receive the death penalty for killing his three children, his wife and his mother in law.
The jury deliberated for 6 hours over three days. They deliberated for about 30 minutes this morning. The judge will have to confirm the sentence. Brothers was found guilty of the five murders on May 15. The judge will review the jury's recommendation on Sept. 27. 283 comments from 54 users
posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 12:32 PM
I don't know why anyone is surprised. After all the jury found him guilty of this horrendous crime. That being the case how could they not impose the death penalty. It has nothing to do with black, white or Bakersfield justice as a few want to spout. A jury sat for a very long time and listened to all the evidence presented and they determined that he is guilty. The community should commend them for their service and for what I am certain was a very gut wrenching decision. posted by
tja2fordsters
on May 29, 2007 at 12:38 PM
I guess the rule of not personally attacking each other has just flown right out the window in this forum. Unfortunate too, these forums represent the community as a whole and to see the tempers and language above don't reveal us in the best light. My thoughts are that even though he may live a long life behind bars, he still doesn't get the freedoms we take for granted. He'll never sit in a Borders reading a magazine, have dinner and drinks with friends at Tahoe Joe's, play hookie from work to see a movie with his buddies... most importantly, be with a woman again (which is obviously a big deal for him seeing his torrid affairs). So, while he will continue to live for what may be a long time... his only love will be from Tony the 300 lb guy in a dress and Sharpie marker mascara... and his only entertainment will be in from of a TV covered in Plexiglas. The only good thing he has is knowing how he will probably die. posted by
LadySandee
on May 29, 2007 at 12:44 PM
Lady Sandee didn't duck out--I don't argue with idiots who resort to name calling... We all have opinions about this case-- the BOTTOM line is--of those who KNOW the truth-5 are dead--so that leaves 2, Vincent Brothers and God Almighty.........I'll put Vincent in Gods hands..... posted by
Perezoso8
on May 29, 2007 at 12:45 PM
A jury decided Tuesday that Vincent Brothers should receive the death penalty for killing his three children, his wife and his mother in law. AS Marv Alpert would say, Yes! Now big decision for homie Vince: gas or the chems. Go for the pentathol sleepy time, Vince man. posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 12:46 PM
I don't care what happens to him. This trial never interested me at all, I never read anything about him, not even this blog. I am only posting this on behalf of others that feel the same way I do.
posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 12:46 PM
Last time I checked 'idiot' is namecalling. So it's the pot calling the kettle black, right?
posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 12:47 PM
Appeal, Overturned, New Trial, Change of Venue, Acquittal. It's possible. Then what will Kern County bloggers have to talk about? Something else will pop up by then, I'm sure. And what was it that one of the jurors said...It was something that the prosecutor said that convinced her of his guilt. I thought his guilt was to be determined by the evidence, not prosecutor's statements or arguments. Damn, they didn't even review all of the evidence, not in 15 hours or less and there was 2 months of testimony. This jury went with the prosecution because she proved he lied; the prosecution lied also, so how much credibility did they have. It will all be sorted out at appellate court. He will get a new trial; the prosecution made absolutely sure of that.
posted by
LadySandee
on May 29, 2007 at 12:50 PM
posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 12:52 PM
So, you believe that Jesus would be FOR the death penalty Sandee?
posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 12:58 PM
In response to anonymous 12:47 PM comment "And what was it that one of the jurors said...It was something that the prosecutor said that convinced her of his guilt. I thought his guilt was to be determined by the evidence, not prosecutor's statements or arguments." I think you need to read the comments by the juror again. "Juror No. 407 said something the prosecutor said in her closing argument helped her reach a verdict on the death penalty." She did not say it helped her reach a verdict of guilty. That verdict was reached before the comments from the prosecutor which the juror was referring to. There is nothing wrong or inappropriate with considering comments from the prosecutor or defense attorney in determing a sentence. posted by
dusty1215
on May 29, 2007 at 12:59 PM
posted by
LadySandee
on May 29, 2007 at 01:00 PM
I will keep that opinion about Jesus to myself--I know what Jesus did in the "market place" --( re/ money changers ) He also said "vengence is mine"---as someone said eariler, whatever happens here on earth, if this penality is carried out or not, Vincent ( along with ALL us humans on the earth ) have to answer to HIM ( GOD ) posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 01:04 PM
I am familiar with the money changers incident as well. Yes, Vincent will have to meet his Maker. That's assuming there is a 'Maker'. But I will take your word for it just for the sake of argument.
posted by
Perezoso8
on May 29, 2007 at 01:06 PM
posted by
jfrancais
on May 29, 2007 at 01:08 PM
One can use the bible to justify anything (death penalty, slavery, Capitalism, etc.)
posted by
Perezoso8
on May 29, 2007 at 01:16 PM
posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 01:47 PM
I will keep that opinion about Jesus to myself--I know what Jesus did in the "market place" So, you have no opinion. Why are you here? posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 01:50 PM
I forgot for a minute that I no longer live in Bakersfield and resorted to that "level"---- Did you read that. She just "dissed" bakers. Yes sandee all of those neo-cons are on a certain "level" posted by
randomfactor
on May 29, 2007 at 01:51 PM
Jesus never said "Vengeance is mine." That was Paul. ('Course, he got a *LOT* of stuff wrong...) . Why not invoke Jee-zus, Pere? I'm a Christian atheist. It's just some of his followers I can't stomach. posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 01:52 PM
Note how one of the regular BC comrades, Random Factor (and acknowledged atheist), has no problem invoking Jee-suss when it comes to opposing the death penalty (or furthering his own agenda) .
Boy did you miss the point of the random's post. Not surprising. Boy that skull is pretty fuzzy. What are you smoking? posted by
GrpThink
on May 29, 2007 at 01:54 PM
It's just some of his followers I can't stomach. Jesus save us... from your followers. posted by
Perezoso8
on May 29, 2007 at 02:02 PM
NO, you missed the point, Anny: RF yawped "what would Jesus do"? Scroll up a few dozen posts, if you have the GUI skills for that. Sort of a moot point anyways, since this is a secular society, and not based on Scripture (tho' it's not consistent anyway). The point is that the anti-death penalty people will whine for months about Brothers (or a Tookie), but few liberals said anything about the railroading of Scott Peterson (and people associated with the case admit there was little or no hard evidence connecting him to Laci's death) . Scott Peterson was on the national hysteria news, 24/7 for a few months; Vince Brothers--whose crime was quite more heinous than that of Peterson's (if SP did it at all) ---barely made it out of Kern . posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 02:04 PM
Ahh your all forgetting the good time Vincent is going to have in prison when the other inmates find out he killed his 3 children.
posted by
randomfactor
on May 29, 2007 at 02:04 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on May 29, 2007 at 02:06 PM
posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 02:07 PM
A jury sat for a very long time and listened to all the evidence presented and they determined that he is guilty, you mean the White jury after one of the white jurors was not going to get his way, so he ratted true or not he ratted, he deserves a T-Shirt. What a bunch of Christians in denial, it was not Bakersfield Justice? Get a clue, this guy was in death row before he went to court the first day, it was a slam dunk, a no brainer, open and shut case the moment Ms Hatchet got the case. Brothers never had a chance, even with a Michael Jackson make over this guy was toast as soon as he was on the judge, jury, and DA's radar. I know that most of Bakersfield white polulation is joyous and Green will probably receive more flowers than a rock star, but the only thing this proved, was the mentality of white Bakersfield on the minority community, but than that is and has never been a secret.
posted by
Perezoso8
on May 29, 2007 at 02:09 PM
posted by
Rie
on May 29, 2007 at 02:09 PM
posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 02:10 PM
Petersen would not have ever been convicted in Kern County, and that is a fact. Unless they gave him an all Black jury, fat chance!
posted by
sfinboston52
on May 29, 2007 at 02:11 PM
posted by
Perezoso8
on May 29, 2007 at 02:13 PM
posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 02:14 PM
"You've been reported, Random Red Factor. You're the clown: atheist-socialist one post; quoting Screepture the next. Or perhaps you're just schizophrenic: a reading of your emotional rants seems to suggest as much. " OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! You are scarring me. LOL! posted by
LadySandee
on May 29, 2007 at 02:15 PM
GOSH-- If this wasn't sooooooo sad it would be hilarious--reading all these "comments"--it's so clear that most of the posters do NOT read the rules-Good ol "Bakersfield-ee-nns" --( type o's are on purpose -BTW ) As far as WHY am I here?? Well--because I have an interest in this case since I lived in Bakersfield when it happened and it's my right--doesn't mean I have to state ALL my opinions and views... Sooooooo if you will excuse me-- I think I'll go out and enjoy my own little corner of this world.. NOT in Bakersfield-- NO OFFENSE lol. posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 02:16 PM
Perezcincocho, easy amigo, you have already been accepted, cool! God is on your side , don't you feel that thorn, it is he, the great one who has chosen you to be.......whatever you imagine that you are. You are as much of a myth in your own mind as GOD.
posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 02:17 PM
Yes go back to your corner. posted by
Perezoso8
on May 29, 2007 at 02:19 PM
Who cares what the sob sisters spam in: some of us will be eating popcorn when the sodium pentathol hits this perps' veins. Buh Bye, Vincey. posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 02:27 PM
Pop corn, no,no, burritos, salsa, menudo, pop corn is for wimps not macho man like us. And Yes you and ladysandee can do the honors, but don't forget to say three hail Marys and two our fathers before you give him the needle, otherwise he might not suffer, and as Christians we cannot have that. Shhhhhhhhhh State assassins at work
posted by
Perezoso8
on May 29, 2007 at 02:30 PM
posted by
mattloch
on May 29, 2007 at 02:32 PM
posted by
LadySandee
on May 29, 2007 at 02:35 PM
WILL DO "ANON"--- WITH YOUR COMMENTS-- IT DOESN'T SURPRISE ME THAT YOU EVER SO "BRAVELY"--- "HIDE" BEHIND THAT "NAME"--LOL posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 02:38 PM
Un arbol y un lasso, great suggestion cincocho, and don't be modest you are the epitome of a good Christian, hang 'em high than forgive them is the Christian way and the Alabama Klan way....and the Bakersfield way!!
posted by
elrojo14
on May 29, 2007 at 02:40 PM
LOL. Some of you people crack me up. I can only say this for what I think, I was not there. I was not at the murder, I was not at the trial, I don't know if he did it or not. That is why I belong to a society where we elect a jury of his peers and they look at the evidence and decide. I don't think it matters if the jurors were black or white (well except the one black juror did have a point, it was lose lose for him, or so he thought). Those of you who think he is innocent because you know him are fools. All mankind if capable of this. I worked in prison and anyone is capable of anything. You might not want to believe he is capable, but you are being naive. I just couldn't help but laugh at the quote in the paper about the guy who said, "No black father would do this." What bull crap. Black, white, Asian, African, European, they are all capable of doing this. Then you get the crowd who wants to attack the death penalty by attacking the Bible. More stupidity. As one poster pointed out, this is a secular society. Secular society says let him die, then he dies. Don't try and change the subject by pretending to know what Jesus wants other people to do concerning the death penalty. If you are a Christian read your Bible, seek God's will, and be confident in your walk. I respect you if you are a Christian against the death penalty or a Christian for the death penalty as long as you are doing what you think is right. When it comes down to it what this secular world wants out of this means nothing to me and my walk. Bottom line, he was convicted of murder. As has been pointed out, what other options according to law are there for a guy who kills two adults and three children in pre-meditated murder? This case is not about race or religion. It is about law and justice. posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 02:42 PM
"HIDE" BEHIND THAT "NAME"--LOL Ladysandee is just another name for anonymous. I'll post my information right after you do. Same to ya! posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 02:42 PM
Can you say that a bit louder, I did not hear it screamer, god I love screamers, they are hot!!
posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 02:46 PM
RE: Rie I am not saying you are wrong but.............. It is possible to know someone and really never know them or what they are really capable of. I do respect your loyalty to a friend. I don't know if he committed the crime or not. I do know that a jury thought he was guilty. They also thought and it seems to have been proven that he was lying on the witness stand. It would also seem from the evidence that he was leading a life full of lies. I know that does not make him a killer. If I were his friend though it would make me wonder. Why all the deception? I would really have to question whether I really knew this person or not. posted by
Perezoso8
on May 29, 2007 at 02:46 PM
posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 02:53 PM
I can hear them now, but they don't excite me as much as ladysandee's, those are scream of pleasure, oh you are so macho senor Perez, and exciting.
posted by
anonymous
on May 29, 2007 at 02:54 PM
You'll enjoy Brothers' screams then when the State terminates his existence here on Earth. I'll bet you said that about bruce sons. posted by
Roselady
on May 29, 2007 at 02:56 PM
It's done, it's over.....enough already!!!!
posted by
Perezoso8
on May 29, 2007 at 02:59 PM
Our readers recommend: |