|
Brothers' attorneys face contempt hearing Judge: Brothers deserves to die Jury recommends Brothers should receive the death penalty VERDICT IN DEATH PENALTY No Verdict This Week Jury begins deliberations in Brothers penalty phase Defense attorney finishes closing argument Defense continues closing argument Defense attorney begins his closing argument Prosecutor finishes closing argument February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Criminalist explains further testing.
For other dollar bills, she could not eliminate Marques Harper as being the major contributor, criminalist Brenda Smith testified.
The phone base had a mixture of contributors, Marques could not be eliminated as the major contributor. The remote control had a mixture, the three children could have contributed to the mixture. The baby monitor had a mixture, several members of the family could not be eliminated. Brothers did not add to the mixture. A gum wrapper found outside the house, could not be identified with anyone in the family. But the major contributor was female. Criminalist Brenda Smith re-tested the glove tip using a new type of tester. The DNA was a mixture of at least three individuals, a male-female mixture, with her not able to eliminate Brothers as a contributor. But she said the DNA had degraded. Does that affect your opinion if Brothers is included or excluded as a contributor to the DNA in the glove tip? No. She eliminated the rest of the family as potential contributors. Some peaks detected were foreign to all individuals. At least one contributors was not the Harper family or Brothers. 0 comments from 0 users
Our readers recommend: |