About BrothersTrial


Member Since:
February 13, 2007
Last Signed In:
September 27, 2007
Profile Views:
4659
Blog Views:
86204
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Brothers' attorneys face contempt hearing
Judge: Brothers deserves to die
Jury recommends Brothers should receive the death penalty
VERDICT IN DEATH PENALTY
No Verdict This Week
Jury begins deliberations in Brothers penalty phase
Defense attorney finishes closing argument
Defense continues closing argument
Defense attorney begins his closing argument
Prosecutor finishes closing argument
Archives
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


BrothersTrial - > The People vs. Vincent Brothers -> Defense attorney begins his closing argument
Defense attorney begins his closing argument
Defense attorney Anthony Bryan begins his closing arguments.

“Naturally I disagree with the verdict you reach. My opinion doesn’t mean anything,” Bryan said.

“There is anything thing that you can consider and that is lingering doubt,” Bryan said.

Bryan reminds the jurors that they all said they could consider life in prison even if Brothers were convicted of the murders.

Bryan, who is known for his loud arguments, is speaking so quietly that he can barely be heard.

“I think one of the things that shows the extreme weakness of the prosecution’s penalty phase case is, I want you to look at the hospital records,” Bryan said. “See if there is anything there that resembles the description as described by Ms. Kern,” Bryan said.

“We have another witness to that, Keith Powell,” Bryan said. “This is a department head at Cal State Bakersfield, he has no reason to lie.”

“There was quite a bit of contact with Margaret,” Bryan said. “It is not uncommon in this society that the contact with a child is limited by the fact that the parents no longer get along.”

“The prosecutor wants you to believe that the defendant should receive among other reasons, because of his contact with (Shann Kern),”

Bryan shows an article The Californian wrote about Brothers because of his participation in the community.

Bryan reminded the jurors that Brothers was an “outstanding” teacher and vice-principal.

“One of the defendant’s abilities is his ability to get along with others,” Bryan said.

“You do not complete high school and college and graduate school and a complete tour with the army and with the marines if you cannot get along well with others,”

“If Mr. Calloway saw Mr. Brothers that weekend at the house is it at all possible to believe that he had done what she says he did,” Bryan said.

“I know you’ve determined otherwise but I must argue lingering doubt, I think that is an enormous amount of doubt,” Bryan said.

“You have three inherintly incredible...clay of the worst sort,” Bryan said.

Bryan said that every time a bug was found, their ranges expanded.

The prosecution bug expert said bugs she would expect to see were not there, Bryan said, if the trip west were made.

“Dr. Kimsey said there should have been white butterflies, they weren’t there,” Bryan said.

“Try driving across the west in the middle of the summer without getting those things on your car and in the air intake system.
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by BrothersTrial on Wednesday, May 23, 2007 at 03:00 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 256 times
3 comments from 3 users

1

posted by anonymous on May 28, 2007 at 07:40 PM
All you nay sayers need to give it up. Tomorrow the jury will come back with the verdict of DEATH.... oh what a happy day!!!
posted by jfrancais on May 28, 2007 at 07:07 PM
The records were admittedly not accurate by the car rental company. I believed they tracked down all of the renters but the amount of mileage was not accurate due to the change of ownership and the fact that records were kept only for oil changes. I believe an employee even testified to renting out the said car before accurately annotating the mileage. I don't know if you can suggest that the Dodge Neon in an accident by Brothers' apartment was his rental, though. I'm sure that there are a significant amount of Neons that drive by his apartment and are able to be in an accident.
posted by anonymous on May 28, 2007 at 11:37 AM
Defense attorney slams Eyewitness - posted May 10, 2007 at 09:43 a.m.  Calvin Calloway said he talked to the defendant outside of the Harper house on July 4, 2003.  Brother's family testified he was in Ohio on that day.  Vincent Brothers said he chased calloway out of the alley behind the Harper house in the week before he went to Ohio, Gardina reminds the jury.  Was the entire record of the Rental of the Dodge Neon available along with the records of all of the Renters of this car?  Brothers made 3 trips to Ohio: April 2003, July 2003, and September 2003.  Was the same rental car used during all of these trips.  Its odd that a recent accident was near Brother's old apartment which involved a Dodge Neon.
1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement