Fred Thompson's was great but Huckabee's was good too when asked WWJD (what would Jesus do) in public office and he said:

"Jesus was far too smart to ever run for public office!"

I liked Romney's impression of Rain Man when asked if he believed every word of the Bible. 

Romney wiffed the bible one no doubt!

Rudy really expressed my opinion when he talked about it being allegorical.

Of course Huckabee would hit it out of the park being a preacher and all!

I still think Rudy with Huck or Fred as veep (which is what I think Freddie wants in first place) is the ticket to beat Her Thighness......

Worst line: "I carried a 45 when I was a pilot in vietnam before getting shot down!"

 Jebus McCain, didn't you learn anything from John Kerry's campaign follies?

"Trancredo and Hunter could be replaced by cadboard cut-outs and nobody would be the wiser."

Ron Paul too, you'd just have to have a servo-motor shaking it..................

but Adam, you don't think Hillary is a panderer?

Obama? Edwards?

Come on!

The only one who isn't is Kucinich IMO!

Clinton, yes.  Colin Freaking Powell? 

.

Still with that, she's better than every single one of the R's running.  But I *STILL* would rather vote for a Democrat.

I'm changing registration for primary and voting for Dennis

Kucinich vs. Huckabee

Now that's a real choice!

I'd vote for *MRS* Kucinich for first lady.  DK would be head-and-shoulders above any Republican alternative.  Even from way down there.  I applaud him for tilting at the impeachment windmill when so few will. 

.

Of course, I'm still holding out for a January, 2009 impeachment.

I'm voting at least once for Edwards.  Twice, I hope.  I'd love to see Edwards/Obama, because after eight years I think Obama would be ready for the White House.  Especially having weathered national campaigning as veep.

.

Spam code NOW IS the time for all good men to come to the aid of the party. 

A better link to CNN knowing about Kerr and his bias is here:

http://newsbusters.org/blog...

I was somewhat disappointed by the questions, McCain and Huckabee were too easy on aliens and their kids.

I didn’t hear who is going to debunk Al Gore’s theories on Global warming or who is man enough to pull the trigger pre-emptively on Iran, or which of our candidates will step up and support permanent Military bases in Iraq. I also wanted to know if any of our candidates would ever be sorry enough to criticize any action by Israel our best ally in the middle-east

But worst of all not enough mention was made of Hillary, the anti-Christ.

Adam, just what friends did you think we had that we no longer have?

I doubt our real "friends" have changed allegiances one bit.

Examples please.............

Andrew Sullivan's blog has the best take I've read on the so-called debate:

I'm not a fiscal liberal, or a supporter of the death penalty, or someone who believes that a candidacy for the presidency of the United States should be based on someone's religious faith. So Huckabee is not for me. But he is easily the most appealing candidate for the current big-spending, evangelical, Southern Republican party. I don't find his religious schtick in any way appealing. It's glib in one area where glibness really is inappropriate. To say something like "Jesus was far too smart to seek public office" may have a superficial appeal, but it is also a cheapening of Jesus' radical injunction to forswear worldly power and wealth. To use such a cheap line to score a laugh in a political debate is not something I find particularly admirable.

But among the crowd on stage, Huckabee seemed by far the most congenial candidate. Paul is much clearer; McCain soared tonight, in my view. I think McCain's experience, independent streak, fiscal responsibility, moral core, and national security mastery make him easily the best viable candidate on stage. Yes, I am immensely proud of Ron Paul. And after Iraq, I find his non-interventionism far more credible than McCain's full neocon jacket. But experience does count; and McCain is in a class of his own in wartime.

Nonetheless, it's clear that today's Dixie-based, pro-torture, anti-immigrant GOP will find it very hard to accept the bipartisan, anti-torture supporter of comprehensive immigration reform as its candidate. Romney really is a tool. Giuliani is just too urban for the party Rove has built. So you can see why Huckabee is rising. I bet he's on a roll now. As "Richelieu" puts it, he does have the most important qualification of anyone on stage: A degree in Bible Studies from Ouachita Baptist University of Arkadelphia, Arkansas.

Think of tonight as Rove's Frankenstein moment.

We still have Israel as a friend. Do we want or need more?

"AS Rush says"      &nb sp;  Keep a few Lib,s around       & nbsp;      if we can make it past this election    we might be around another 20 years.

Ron.

Nancy, not only was it not a debate, it was spring loaded by the Clinton Campaign for the use of the Clinton News Network to attack the hapless Repubs

who were to damn dumb to say no to this travesty

like the Dems did to Fox................

Too bad they had to use shills huh?  

These things are nothing more than a chance to give their opinion on a topic picked by questioners..and questionable ones at that. 

Lets see some REAL debates between candidates and not between all the Tom Dick and Harry's lined up like crows on a fence line.  Hopefully when it's narrowed down to just the two main candidates we'll see how well they really do.  And then I'll watch.

Can you imagine the dust up had Fox News done what CNN did?

Just think about it!

Of Coors the Dims were at least un-Dim enough to refuse to appear on Fox

Why should the Democrats attend a debate run by the RNC?  Look how much the 'Publicans objected to *ONE* questioner tied however remotely to a Democratic candidate....

.

It *IS* applicable.  There, I have refuted him.

  Also, FOX isn't a news channel, they're infotainment

and slobbering ranting Kieth Olberman is not?

Clinton News Network is what?

Fox is over your head