About ChicoEsquela


Real Name:
Chico Esquela
Address:
23543 Avenue 56, Ducor, CA
Biggest Butler Bldg=>TeePee
Ducor, CA 93218
Cell:
(esc)uch-enes
Date of Birth:
December 14, 1945
Member Since:
July 31, 2007
Last Signed In:
July 23, 2008
Profile Views:
2222
Blog Views:
18658
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
It really IS as simple as THIS...............
Swimming & Drooling............ You Gotta LOVE This Dog!
Obama Will Revive Redistributionism.................
Did Anyone see the Asteroid reported on KCAL9?
Obama and Dems Lying About Oil Leases.............
"Dr." Mark Martinez -- Some Questions -- Feel Free to Use Surrogate Chica to Answer.......
I was just wondering.................
Gun Owners -- Pay Attention!
If you care at all about Big Money in Politics............
Pat Buchanan on Obama and Race
Archives
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08

http://www.sounddogs.com/pr... 

Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL
ChicoEsquela - > MOO! -> Military Bans Porn? Guess it depends what you consider Porn!
Military Bans Porn? Guess it depends what you consider Porn!
Soldiers Say Porn Ban May Hurt Morale
Stars and Stripes | Seth Robson | May 05, 2008

GRAFENWOHR, Germany -- Legislation that would restrict the sale of certain men's magazines on U.S. military bases around the world would be bad for morale, according to soldiers at Grafenwöhr.

 

U.S. Rep. Paul Broun, R-Ga., has introduced legislation that would close a loophole in the current law that allows the sale of some sexually explicit material on military bases by lowering the threshold required to deem material "sexually explicit."

A Department of Defense committee that reviews materials sold on bases ruled last year that magazines such as Playboy and Penthouse are not pornographic. But Broun's Military Honor and Decency Act includes language that could make those magazines eligible for the ban.

The prospect of missing out on men's magazines was not welcomed by soldiers at Grafenwöhr.

"We all read 'em," said Pfc. Paul Rubio, 31, of Bakersfield, Calif. "There are times we just read 'em for the technological parts like the new gadgets that come out. They have good stories sometimes too."

Sgt. Simon Brown, 34, of Daytona Beach, Fla., said men's magazines build morale. "It's not all about the pictures, although 80 percent of it is," he said.

Pfc. Greg Smith, 21, of Northboro, Mass., a regular Playboy reader, said soldiers should be allowed to buy nudie magazines at the exchange.

"Playboy is good entertainment while you are on the can. They have jokes and good stories," he said.

Broun, a Marine veteran, told Newsweek recently that the magazines sold in military exchanges are partly responsible for a rise in sexual assaults in the military and other problems.

"Allowing the sale of pornography on military bases has harmed military men and women by: escalating the number of violent, sexual crimes; feeding a base addiction; eroding the family as the primary building block of society; and denigrating the moral standing of our troops both here and abroad," Broun says on his Web site.

The legislation would require the DOD to annually review material that is not currently deemed sexually explicit to determine if it should be prohibited, according to the Web site.

Some soldiers say magazines that could be banned are particularly important downrange.

Brown deployed to Afghanistan in 2002 and 2005 and is preparing to go to Iraq with the 12th Combat Aviation Brigade this summer. When he was in Afghanistan he was one of the first to pick up a new copy of Maxim or FHM when it came out, he said.

"It would suck if they ban it," he said. "It's bad enough we are down there to begin with. Taking that away would be like a knife in the chest. I'm not saying I'm depending on Maxim to keep me alive over there, but it helps."

Publications such as Maxim and FHM are not named by Broun, but lowering the threshold of the sexually explicit definition might mean such magazines would be targeted for a ban.

Some troops in the Pacific region said the proposed legislation would impinge upon their personal freedoms.

"They're making it a point of undermining soldiers to almost make them feel like we're back in elementary school," Pfc. Nickolas Sears said Friday at Camp Red Cloud, South Korea. "We're all adults here, and if it's something we want to do, we should feel free to choose as we please."

Other than on base, there's no place in South Korea to buy magazines like Playboy, he said.

"I believe it's a breach of freedom of speech," said Senior Airman Garrett Deese, 25, of Elk Grove, Calif., who just completed a tour with the 8th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron at Kunsan Air Base, South Korea.

He said he wonders whether such a ban would lead to barring other types of magazines lawmakers chose to challenge. He also questioned whether Broun's link between magazines and sexual assaults within the military would stand close scrutiny.

At Yokota Air Base, Japan, military spouse Roberta Woolley said she understands the need for balance between rules and individual rights, but said the military has tougher standards than the rest of American society.

"It's a good idea," she said of the proposed ban. "I think there's better literature out there.... In the military, we sell cigarettes and alcohol legally. But it's also questionable whether they promote a healthy lifestyle.

"I've seen all these magazines, and they don't make men or women intelligent or beautiful. And even though they're hidden, there is still exposure to children as well. It's the parents' responsibility to give ideas about body awareness to their children. I don't think Mr. Hefner presents a positive image of men or women in his magazine."

A female soldier at Grafenwöhr -- Sgt. Pou McCall, 23, of Riverside, Calif. -- said men's magazines don't bother her a lot, but she'd support a ban.

"What if it was their (soldiers') sisters (in the magazines)? It doesn't take a magazine for sexual harassment to happen but it increases it," she said.

Army and Air Force Exchange service public relations manager Judd Anstey said AAFES sold $231,000 worth of Penthouse, Playboy and Playgirl magazines in Europe last year.

"Sales of these three titles account for 2.7 percent of total European magazine sales ($8.5 million) at AAFES facilities," he said.

The sales accounted for 0.5 percent of worldwide AAFES magazine sales of $46.4 million, he said.

Stars and Stripes' reporters Vince Little, Franklin Fisher and Erik Slavin contributed to this report.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by ChicoEsquela on Wednesday, May 7, 2008 at 06:53 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 67 times
17 comments from 4 users

1

posted by ChicoEsquela on May 7, 2008 at 06:54 AM

Playboy? Maxim? This is getting PC Ridiculous IMHO!

posted by catpaw on May 7, 2008 at 07:38 AM

About as stupid as it gets. Maybe we should send the troops "In God We Trust" posters. That will build character and morale.

posted by ChicoEsquela on May 7, 2008 at 07:41 AM

Cat, this is indicative of the entire PC culture and ethic permeating our society today.

Its like all the wining Libs who went crazy over Abu Gharib. Ridiculous!

Wait until Obama gets his shot at our military. More  "social experimentation" with the basic instincts of our GI's. Maybe they'll bring back Jocelyn Elder's plan for  "safe bullets!"

posted by randomfactor on May 7, 2008 at 07:56 AM

Damn those Republicans and their "PC culture," anyway!  Next thing you know, they'll be taking "Blue Boy" out of the RNC lending library...

posted by ChicoEsquela on May 7, 2008 at 08:02 AM

Only you (well maybe one other poster) would know what  "Blue Boy" even is! :rotflmao:

posted by randomfactor on May 7, 2008 at 08:05 AM

Gee, Chico, you need to get out more.

.

Betcha Senator Larry Craig (R) knows it...

posted by ChicoEsquela on May 7, 2008 at 08:15 AM

Reminds me of  "Lenny the Lopin Lizzard"  in boot camp!

We finally had ta rat pack the dude, none of us could sleep!

Then there were all the rumors about  "salt peter"  in the food too........

posted by siouxcityranch on May 7, 2008 at 08:29 AM

its pretty dam stupid if ya ask me..they can get all the porn they want on the internet..Playboy is pretty tame or was..havent seen one in years. The soldiers deserve anything they want within reason to keep up morale, More so than some kid his same age home sitten on the couch.

Never heard of Blue Boy but from the response it probably should be removed from the shelves.

posted by randomfactor on May 7, 2008 at 08:36 AM

Wonder if it's the political commentary the military's trying to ban?  Y'all know those magazines have words in them too, right?

posted by ChicoEsquela on May 7, 2008 at 08:47 AM

They have words in em?   ;=)

In the words of the Ted Zeppelin:  "Come onnnnhhhhhh"

Actually I remember reading an article in playboy in VN where Ted Kennedy was against the ABM theory due to the ways it could be easly defeated (chattel, etc.) and that trying to defend against Russia (remember them) with anti-ballistic missile defnese could break our back economically.

I actually agreed with Teddy at the time.

My, how things have changed!

posted by randomfactor on May 7, 2008 at 09:01 AM

Things haven't changed, Chico.  Apparently *YOU* have.  Kennedy's still on the right side of most stuff.

posted by ChicoEsquela on May 7, 2008 at 09:12 AM

Turned out he was right about the economic downfall of a country trying to  "keep up" militarily.

He just had the wrong country!

He hasn't been right about much since.

Can you believe I used to get  "National Review" delivered to a firebase?

No Playboy, just National Lampoon and National Review.

Most of the grunts thought I was wierd! haha!

posted by randomfactor on May 7, 2008 at 09:41 AM

He was right on AUMF.  Of course, that's the same thing he was right on regarding "economic downfall."

posted by ChicoEsquela on May 7, 2008 at 09:47 AM

At first I thought you typed REMF!  haha!

That wasn't me............ haha!

posted by randomfactor on May 7, 2008 at 09:51 AM

I've reflected on the similarity between the acronyms myself. 

posted by ChicoEsquela on May 7, 2008 at 10:05 AM

Actually I tried to  "work" myself into an REMF position in VN.

I never shoulda told em I liked to  "camp out" at Ford Ord!  LOL!

posted by catpaw on May 7, 2008 at 11:41 AM

Last time I visited Ft. Ord, it wasn't Ft. Ord anymore. I actually got lost in the place.

Anyway, the whole porno argument seems contrary and meaningless to me. No home grown American is going to serve in a war zone and come home the same person. I don't mean that to mean only troops who carry a gun. The soldier or sailor has a ringside seat and witnesses the things that make war the insanity it is. Kill people, get shot at, look at women and children devastated by war, watch your friends get blown into a jigsaw puzzle,  but don't look at naked girlie pictures....might screw up your morale.

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: