|
Gay Marriage Based On Religious Freedom Must Be Consistent A "Christian Nation" -- Impossible Even By Religious Right's Criteria The Only Gay Marriage Argument You'll Ever Need My Thoughts on the In God We Trust Scare A Spooky (And True) Story of Precognition World's 3rd Richest Man Says Taxes on the Rich Are Too Low New Right's War on the Constitution: The Under-Reported Truth Religious Right Group's Belief in Religious Freedom Does Not Extend to Others Take The Time To Fight Phishing Creationist Betrays True Motives (Again) July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 News, views, and professional iconoclasm from the green side of libertarianism. About the graphic: Created by Yours Truly using Ray Dream Studio. - Take The Time To Fight Phishing
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Republican / FCC Media Power Grab, Chapter 2
Well, what have we here? Senator Barbara Boxer comes forth with another damning report about corporate media consolidation that she says the FCC shelved.
. This one is even more damning. . According to a Washington Post story, the number of commercial radio stations on the air rose 5.9 percent, while the number of station owners plummeted 35 percent during the time period from March 1996 to March 2003. . And who's deeply involved in a renewed effort to relax or repeal restrictions against monopolistic media ownership? Right-wing friendly Clear Channel Communications, Inc. . The Republican majority on the Federal Communications Commission board voted, among other things, to "eliminate its existing system of measuring radio markets and use one favored by Arbitron, a private firm best known for measuring ratings. The commission decided not to force broadcasters to divest stations in markets where the new boundaries would push the broadcast companies over the limit," according to the Washington Post. . Funny, this is about the time when the last remnants of dissenting opinion started disappearing from the radio airwaves. . I ask again: why would a Republican-led FCC, and a Republican President Bush, be so determined to give big media even more power, if the media had a "liberal agenda?" . I intend to shoot down this mindless myth that the media are "liberal" -- proof by irrefutable proof. This mythical "liberal media" claim was itself popularized by the media -- and right-wing agitators bent on purging the last trace of dissent from the airwaves. . If you have not already watched the 1946 school film Despotism, produced by Encyclopedia Britannica, I strongly urge doing so. . http://www.archive.org/deta... . Toward the end is a foreboding -- and astoundingly prophetic -- warning of the danger that a free and democratic society faces when media control falls into the hands of a privileged few with a narrow political view. . 15 comments from 5 users
1
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Sep 18, 2006 at 07:33 PM
posted by
robbwillis
on Sep 18, 2006 at 10:11 PM
posted by
TomW
on Sep 18, 2006 at 10:43 PM
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Sep 19, 2006 at 07:07 AM
. Broadcast media are required by FCC regulations to operate in the public interest. There is no way in hell that it can be in the public's interest to devote 95% of your radio opinion shows to the same third of the community. . There is another third that is generally liberal, and still another third that is independent and looks at issues more closely than they look at political parties. . To leave this remaining two-thirds of the community completely voiceless cannot possibly be serving the public interest. posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Sep 19, 2006 at 07:13 AM
posted by
randomfactor
on Sep 19, 2006 at 07:22 AM
. But yes, media balance is essential. The Internet is tipping that balance at least a bit. posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Sep 19, 2006 at 07:44 AM
posted by
randomfactor
on Sep 19, 2006 at 07:48 AM
posted by
TomW
on Sep 19, 2006 at 08:18 AM
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Sep 19, 2006 at 08:34 AM
What would a viable McCarthy alternative look like? Me! hahahahaha I see the point about donations to other Republican causes, though. Sometimes, when voting for a candidate that you have relatively few issue disagreements with, you have to consider whether his/her win would empower other people who are extremely dangerous. posted by
TomW
on Sep 19, 2006 at 08:38 AM
posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Sep 19, 2006 at 08:40 AM
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Sep 19, 2006 at 08:44 AM
. It isn't working out that way. . That's why I pound Dems on message delivery and for neglecting media activism. They need to sharpen their message and demand the media access to deliver it. posted by
TomW
on Sep 19, 2006 at 08:51 AM
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Sep 19, 2006 at 08:51 AM
Pete, that's another factor, I'm sure. And that's another reason why the Bush regime must be toppled at all costs. I would vote for an administration full of Phil Angelides'es if that were the only way to get these evil monsters out of power. The cancer at the top is what needs to be excised.
1
BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:Advertisement |