|
Gay Marriage Based On Religious Freedom Must Be Consistent A "Christian Nation" -- Impossible Even By Religious Right's Criteria The Only Gay Marriage Argument You'll Ever Need My Thoughts on the In God We Trust Scare A Spooky (And True) Story of Precognition World's 3rd Richest Man Says Taxes on the Rich Are Too Low New Right's War on the Constitution: The Under-Reported Truth Religious Right Group's Belief in Religious Freedom Does Not Extend to Others Take The Time To Fight Phishing Creationist Betrays True Motives (Again) July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 News, views, and professional iconoclasm from the green side of libertarianism. About the graphic: Created by Yours Truly using Ray Dream Studio. - Take The Time To Fight Phishing
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Extreme Negligence: Mainstream media ignore far right's TOP election issue. Again.
What's really at stake this November? For about 13 percent of Americans -- the 13 percent that President Bush caters heavily to -- the stake is the intentional destruction of Constitutional liberty in the United States. The 13 percent that, in the form of James Dobson and Ted Haggard, enjoy the President's private ear for an unbelievable hour every week. . Focus on the Family, a big-government, anti-freedom Religious Right group, warns as follows: http://www.citizenlink.org/... With them, according to Bruce Hausknecht, judicial analyst of Focus on the Family Action, will hang the fates of pre-born babies, marriage and religious liberty. "The success of the president's judicial appointments depends on conservative control of the Senate," he said." 22 comments from 7 users
1
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Nov 3, 2006 at 08:18 PM
posted by
coochee
on Nov 3, 2006 at 09:58 PM
posted by
mattloch
on Nov 3, 2006 at 11:16 PM
posted by
mattloch
on Nov 4, 2006 at 12:51 AM
There's a certain dumb logic to it; there are calculations made in his head and within the political idiot-savant mind of Karl Rove that could see a certain perverse upside to it. Like the advice to the new prisoner: go up to the biggest, baddest guy in the joint and break your lunch tray across the bridge of his nose. Either you'll take him by surprise and knock him out cold, after which you're not to be messed with; or you enrage him and he puts you into the infirmary, after which you'll be known as certifiably crazy and won't have to worry about being hassled. posted by
tkozy
on Nov 4, 2006 at 04:54 AM
Regrets of Iraq Stance In an issue of Vanity Fair that was published in November of 2006, Adelman indicated that he regrets urging military action in Iraq and feels that he overestimated the abilities of the Bush administration leadership. He was quoted of saying "I just presumed that what I considered to be the most competent national security team since Truman was indeed going to be competent." He also added, "They turned out to be among the most incompetent teams in the postwar era. Not only did each of them, individually, have enormous flaws, but together they were deadly, dysfunctional." posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Nov 4, 2006 at 06:43 AM
I don't get HBO. posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Nov 4, 2006 at 11:34 AM
. Rick Santorum, a traitor to American values by definition, looks all but dead. Webb is pulling ahead of cutthroat George Allen. The low-key but dangerous James Talent is trailing. Conrad Burns is in deep doo-doo. . Though less likely to lose than the above, I would love to see the smarmy, freedom-hating Arizona senator Jon Kyl get the boot. I get sick of seeing his smug, condescending head rocking back and forth as if pivoted from behind as he speaks. . Lincoln Chafee, while the best of the Reps and not at all a freedom hater, is in trouble. While Chafee is a good guy to have around, what matters in 2006 is numbers. Another "D" in the Senate matters more for America's future right now than the retention of a decent Republican. posted by
allRED
on Nov 5, 2006 at 08:41 AM
Santorum, Conrad, Allen, Talent, Kyl, will win and I hope Chafee loses. You will lose New Jersey. Ron. posted by
TomW
on Nov 5, 2006 at 08:55 AM
posted by
TomW
on Nov 5, 2006 at 09:03 AM
posted by
dusty1215
on Nov 5, 2006 at 11:16 AM
posted by
dusty1215
on Nov 5, 2006 at 11:18 AM
Mattloch, I tivo's the HBO special..I will watch it later this evening..if I am still up with this horrid cold I have. posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Nov 5, 2006 at 11:23 AM
"Conservative" judges won't physically give them what they want. posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Nov 5, 2006 at 11:32 AM
. Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennesee, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Kentucky, Utah -- even Kansas, West Virginia, the Carolinas -- all waiting for a "conservative" majority in the federal judiciary to permit them to come crashing down like a ton of bricks on their citizens' freedoms. posted by
TomW
on Nov 5, 2006 at 11:43 AM
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Nov 5, 2006 at 11:53 AM
. Question is: Can we count on him to protect the Constitution when judges are nominated? . Or will be be an embittered little twit who will vote far right to "punish" the Democratic voters who bumped him off in the primary? . His decision to run anyway as an independent is one tick mark in the "embittered twit" column. posted by
dusty1215
on Nov 5, 2006 at 09:39 PM
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Nov 6, 2006 at 06:58 AM
. I know you're not being a smartass, but I'm deeply concerned nonetheless, when the people on "our side" just don't get it. What you and so many progressives say "simply can't happen" is happening -- in part because it's simply so unbelievable. (I feel like the people in early Nazi Germany warning about the concentration camps, and having a devil of a time getting good people to believe it!) . The Supreme Court is supposed to protect and enforce the Constitution. . The far right is insisting on judges who will simply, wilfully ignore it. It's like the Mafia infiltrating law enforcement and only hiring cops who will look the other way when they break the law. . I don't know how much plainer I can make it. They want judges who will ignore the law (Constitution) when it's being broken (our rights taken away). . Read my post that I linked to within the body of this article. Think it through. It's all true. posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Nov 6, 2006 at 07:06 AM
. They have heard Rick Santorum, Sam Brownshirt, and others, claim that we should have no right to privacy. They have heard Tom DeLay and others claim that the Supreme Court shouldn't even have the authority to overturn illegal laws!!! . Why the F aren't our Democratic Senators demanding a ton of media time to explain this to the American people??? . Forgive my French, but this is the most important goddammed issue facing America -- and I have a devil of a time getting progressives to take it seriously! . (Sorry for the outburst.) posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Nov 6, 2006 at 07:18 AM
. Here is Scalia himself saying that the federal courts should not even have the power to overturn unconstitutional laws: . http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.c... CITY OF CHICAGO, PETITIONER v. JESUS MORALES et al. on writ of certiorari to the supreme court of illinois [June 10, 1999] Justice Scalia , dissenting. "Respondents' consolidated appeal presents a facial challenge to the Chicago Ordinance on vagueness grounds. When a facial challenge is successful, the law in question is declared to be unenforceable in all its applications, and not just in its particular application to the party in suit. To tell the truth, it is highly questionable whether federal courts have any business making such a declaration...." . I know it's a lot of legal-speak, but that's exactly what he is saying. . He's saying that the courts should simply stop overturning illegal laws!!! . All of this information is available on my Yahoo group which you and Tom belong to. posted by
TomW
on Nov 6, 2006 at 08:29 AM
posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Nov 6, 2006 at 08:39 AM
. And Jon Tester rocks. . I'm sorry , but it just drives me to despair when most all I hear from the Left is Iraq, Iraq, Patriot Act, torture, Iraq, torture, NSA, Patriot Act, and a sprinkling of Halliburton. . You're [general "you're"] preaching to a small choir, when you should be recruiting a bigger choir. . Sure, there is a teeny, itsy-bitsy, 0.00001% chance that you'll be arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit terrorism. You can't move people on that, the fear of an infinitesimal chance of being arrested and tortured. People are willing to take tetanus shots in the face of more risk than that. . If the Left were moving people on the right issues -- the pertinent-in-today's-world issues -- we wouldn't have Prop. 22 (the restrict marriage initiative). We'd have medical marijuana. We'd have the right to die with dignity -- because the Supreme Court would have recognized it. . Again, I write this directed generally and not personally -- but it's not the 1960s any more. You're not going to motivate people on this NSA and Patriot Act stuff. . You will motivate them on this.
1
BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:Advertisement |