|
Couple Busted for Refusing to Pay Tip Global Warming Meltdown: Climategate! ANOTHER BLOW TO THE MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING RELIGION Fed Sicks Attack Dogs On Ron Paul After Audit Amendment Passes CNN Propaganda Segment on Oath Keepers Demonizes Fall of the Republic With Hurricanes At Thirty Year Low, Gore Turns To Photoshop Another Example Of How Our Country Is Sinking Into The Depths Of Serfdom(wait until happens here) Listen to the Alex Jones Radio Show (Live Now) Tune in Purging The Undesirables: ADL Attempts To Pin A Yellow Star On Grass Roots America Bill O’Reilly: “I Don’t Care About The Constitution” June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09 "IF YOUR'E GOING TO PUT YOUR FAMILY IN A NURSING HOME... YOU BETTER VISIT THEM AT LEAST EVERY TWO DAYS, YOU BETTER LIVE NEAR THEM, YOU BETTER BRING THEM LUNCH, YOU BETTER SIT THERE AND WATCH TV WITH THEM, YOU BETTER SIT THERE AND RUB THERE FEET AND LOVE YOUR PARENTS (voice raises in anger) THAT WIPED YOUR BUTT, THAT TOOK CARE OF YOU, YOU SCUMBAG YUPPIES!!!"
"What a bunch of garbage, liberal, Democratic, conservative, Republican, it's all there to control you, two sides of the same coin! Two management teams, bidding for control of the CEO job of Slavery Incorporated!" --Alex Jones We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years......It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries. Author: David Rockefeller, Source: Trilateral Commission meeting, June, 1991
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Rupert Murdoch: “Internet Will Soon Be Over”
Corporate media forced to charge dwindling readership for news content as establishment propaganda organs wither and die while alternative media soars
Billionaire media mogul Rupert Murdoch gave a strange response when asked about plans for mainstream news websites to charge for content, declaring, “The current days of the internet will soon be over.” He was making reference to the fact that corporate media websites cannot continue to survive under their current failing business model. The establishment media is dying and advertising revenue has plummeted as people turn to blogs and the alternative media for their news in an environment of corporate lies and spin. This has forced sectors of the corporate media to charge the dwindling number of loyal readers they have left for news content, a practice which is set to become widespread according to Murdoch. This will only send more people over to the alternative media as the old organs of de facto state-controlled propaganda wither and die. “Asked whether he envisaged fees at his British papers such as the Times, the Sunday Times, the Sun and the News of the World, (Murdoch) replied: “We’re absolutely looking at that,” reports the Guardian. “Taking questions on a conference call with reporters and analysts, he said that moves could begin “within the next 12 months‚” adding: “The current days of the internet will soon be over.” Murdoch’s newspapers and TV networks, which include Fox News and the Asian Star Network, have seen profits plummet from $216m to just $7m year-on-year. MySpace.com is also floundering despite a recent move to replace the company’s entire management staff. It was all but over for the Boston Globe this week, following a threat to close the 137-year-old publication after net losses of $85 million this year alone. Only a last minute cost-cutting agreement on behalf of its owner, The New York Times Company, and The Boston Newspaper Guild, saved the newspaper. But it’s not just establishment newspapers that are struggling to survive - social networking websites like Twitter and corporate online video giant You Tube are also deep in the red. Apparently, paying out millions in server fees for half the population of the planet to watch clips of cute puppies isn’t a sustainable business model. This is why You Tube is being forced to pursue lucrative partnerships with giant production studios and broadcasters, at the expense of user generated content which has been relegated to a sub-section of its website, taking the “You” out of You Tube altogether. Content that may be deemed harmful to You Tube’s corporate agenda and its multi-million dollar partnership deals, like The Alex Jones Channel, is being systematically erased from You Tube’s website under the pretext of flimsy copyright infringement claims. The jig is up for the corporate media. If they continue to allow free access to their content they will go out of business because there’s not enough advertising revenue coming in, whereas if they charge for content they will lose a huge chunk of their audience and their influence in shaping the news agenda will wane completely. This is the price the corporate media has paid for lying, spinning and obfuscating on behalf of the virulently corrupt power elite and expecting the population to eat it up without question. The corporate media monopoly has terminal cancer and they are losing their power, which is why they are aggressively supporting moves to phase out the old Internet altogether and replace it with “Internet 2,” a highly regulated and controlled electronic Berlin wall, where alternative voices will be silenced and giant corporate propaganda organs will dominate once again. This what Murdoch is really getting at when he assures us that, “The Internet will soon be over” and it’s down to us to stop that agenda from being realized. Paul Joseph Watson www.prisonplanet.com/rupert-murdoch-internet-will -soon-be-over.html
4 comments from 3 users
1
posted by
UncleToad
on May 7, 2009 at 10:35 PM
How? My buddy runs a small website, and he can't afford the server fees to let half the world watch his stuff. YouTube is run by a corperation, is PrisonPlanet.com planning on their own video start up? Even when it was a more liberal startup, did the users actually contribute to it's upkeep? It's popular, but that doesn't nessessitate that costs will be covered. That's why, when they were hit with a ton of cash, they sold out. I would too. This ain't free, my buddy spends the coin 'cause it's what he wants. I'm at a loss how "free" internet services can be sustained and retain the level of free-dom that people want. It's a quandary. "National Public Internet" maybe? I just dunno. I'm not a network engineer, I'm just an old guy who still feels a little dirty giving money to a corperation with the Death Star as their logo. posted by
Infowar
on May 8, 2009 at 06:47 AM
Alex Jones owns prisonplanet.tv, it cost about five bucks a month to be a member. You get access to tons of stuff. At the same time Alex Jones constantly encourages people to put his work out for free. Alex pays for his operation by using sponsors & donations. His forums & comments are loosely moderated. Only extremely profane & extremely violent threats are banned,
Anyways what I am getting at is..... Whether youtube is owned by a corporation & charges people or it is free, the point is that youtube is supposed to be user based. The rating systems on youtube is a total farce. Videos are clearly being censored on youtube. For instance 'The Obama Deception' has almost two million views but has yet to be placed in any of their top categories. The Internet has been around for awhile now with out all of the threats its' currently facing. The Rupert Murdoch's of the world who own the Government propaganda arms are threatened by free speech on the Internet, It threatens the agendas their media outlets push, hence why News Corp. that is owned by Rupert Murdoch purchased myspace for over five hundred million dollars. Pretty soon the Internet will be so controlled, I guess that's how some of you folks like it. No offense Uncletoad but I get a feeling that you don't completely understand the "internets & it's tubes (I hope you get the reference)" The Internet is the last frontier for true free speech. We can't allow that to be destroyed by a bunch of elitist filth & ignorant sheep who allow it.
posted by
learnem
on May 8, 2009 at 07:34 AM
RM is just bent that the viewpoint in his rags that he attempts to push on the american and world public arent being consumed as he would like so, he fails to recognize HIS failing business model, yet calls the internet a failing business model? please maybe if you quit the "right good, left bad" crap, and helping to polarize the american people politically, so that the marginalized, fringe politicians you own lock stock and barrel...LEFT AND RIGHT can shove their agenda down the throats of unsuspecting americans, and actually reported as a TOTAL government watchdog (i see NONE of his media outlets have reported on the SAVAGE/England debacle)...then your business model WILL continue to fail deception doesnt sell, unless its sold as fiction, not real
lol spam code myken posted by
UncleToad
on May 8, 2009 at 10:27 PM
No, I understand it just fine, it's that a lot of people complain about the "loss" of free services such as YouTube without realizing how much money is required to maintain it at its current levels. I'm not happy with the alliances it's making, after all, CBS already has Veoh (and did a number on several videos of my buddies which clearly fell under the 'fair use' doctrine) and NBC has Hulu. Neither really offers anything but bread and circuses, Hulu more so. I was suprised YouTube didn't go to a high/low mix, where the original 320x240 video would be free and the higher def would be ad supported or something. Basic websites, with modest bandwidth requirements are not hard to afford, but get lost amongst the chaff if there's no big draw. Once you've got that hook, and begin to exceed your bandwidth then it gets more and more expensive to maintain. That's my worry, is that more and more glitzy front ends and higher requirements will price the average WebJoe out of the Internet. I keep an eye on benchmarks and stuff like that.
1
Advertisement |