|
The Economy is a Lie, too By Paul Craig Roberts TV Environmentalist Goes Nuts Over ClimateGate CNBC:The ‘Real’ Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed Forget The Emails, Code Discusses “Artificially Adjusted” Temperatures BBC Climate Correspondent Was Forwarded CRU Emails Five Weeks Before They Were Made Public Climate Alarmists Finally Admit The Debate Is Not Over New EU President Rompuy announces 2009 as “first year of global governance” London Guardian: Global body needed to direct green technology, G77 says Call For Independent Inquiry Into Climategate as Global Warming Fraud Implodes Couple Busted for Refusing to Pay Tip June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09 "IF YOUR'E GOING TO PUT YOUR FAMILY IN A NURSING HOME... YOU BETTER VISIT THEM AT LEAST EVERY TWO DAYS, YOU BETTER LIVE NEAR THEM, YOU BETTER BRING THEM LUNCH, YOU BETTER SIT THERE AND WATCH TV WITH THEM, YOU BETTER SIT THERE AND RUB THERE FEET AND LOVE YOUR PARENTS (voice raises in anger) THAT WIPED YOUR BUTT, THAT TOOK CARE OF YOU, YOU SCUMBAG YUPPIES!!!"
"What a bunch of garbage, liberal, Democratic, conservative, Republican, it's all there to control you, two sides of the same coin! Two management teams, bidding for control of the CEO job of Slavery Incorporated!" --Alex Jones We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years......It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries. Author: David Rockefeller, Source: Trilateral Commission meeting, June, 1991
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
||
|
Shots Fired at home of Lou Dobbs
------------------------------------
(Battle For The Republic: Watch it via youtube in two parts) "Battle For The Republic" Exposes Real Immigration Agenda part 1 Part 2 www.youtube.com/watch
Alex Jones' Battle For The Republic exposes how the elite are using illegal immigration and pushing amnesty as a means of pulverizing the American middle class and ensuring that U.S. citizens, black, white and hispanic alike, are forced to sacrifice their freedom and sovereignty as America is sunk into a third world cesspool. The mini-documentary lifts the lid on how the backlash against rampant illegal immigration in America is a major concern for the Bilderberg Group, posing a threat to their plans to lower the living standards of U.S. citizens of all colors and creeds into second or even third world status. What is the real agenda behind last year's massive pro-illegal immigration demonstrations and who is really behind them? Battle For the Republic traces the legacy of the movement back to the Plan of San Diego, a shocking blueprint for race-based genocide directed against blacks and whites in America. The goal is to divide America by bankrolling the Aztlan movement, an extremist separatist plan on behalf of Mexican Ku Klux Klan style groups like Mecha and La Raza to "reclaim" the southern and western U.S. states, in order to eventually merge America, Canada and Mexico into a North American Union. Battle For The Republic shoots down the myth that Mexico has any rightful claim to the south western states by carefully documenting the history of how the west was won, bringing it up to the modern day and highlighting how the elite are using the enraged Mexican mobs as a weapon of conquest to slit America's throat and sacrifice its sovereignty on the altar of globalism. Hispanic Radio and TV stations owned by huge corporations based in New York spew hatred and division as Mexicans are radicalized and told that all their problems stem from the racist American middle class while ignoring the fact that the elite are the true cause of their misery, as taxpayers are sucked dry to fund welfare which only subsidizes the corporations that employ the illegals. Illegal aliens are being granted God-like status by the elite and given rights that super seed those of American citizens. The film highlights the case of a man who was assaulted and arrested by police for expressing his first amendment right to disagree with thousands of illegal aliens marching in downtown Seattle, and how illegals who assaulted him and smashed his car were left completely alone while throngs of Mexicans cheered as an American was taken to jail for exercising his freedom of speech. "Now you're bleeding, what's it like now, bitch!" yells one illegal as blood drips from the man's face. Battle For the Republic ends with Alex Jones' infamous protest of Vicente Fox when he came to Austin to give awards to police for breaking federal laws by not arresting illegal aliens. Fox was forced to cut his speech short after Alex Jones bullhorned the truth about his role in destroying American sovereignty, making headlines across Texas. 46 comments from 11 users
1
posted by
samheath
on Oct 30, 2009 at 09:22 AM
It may be God and attending angels that Lou Dobbs and Glenn Beck are still alive, seeing their enemy is really our own government that feeds and gets fat off illegal aliens and drugs. posted by
ALICEN
on Oct 30, 2009 at 09:32 AM
Info: I still can't understand why it is that certain people are so afraid of free speech. If we don't stand up for free speech of even those with whom we disagree, we may then find ourselves in the same group as those who have been silenced. Is this what we want our country to be? We disagree with someone, so we shoot them? Those tactics often backfire, pardon the pun.
posted by
AudreyB
on Oct 30, 2009 at 09:33 AM
Our government is our enemy? Who sends you your Social Security check Sam? And do you have the Medicare Drug Plan? Drugs and Money. Yeah, that's what's wrong with our government. But why are you taking drugs and money from your enemy? posted by
samheath
on Oct 30, 2009 at 09:38 AM
I paid into SS for over 50 years; can you say the same Audrey? posted by
AudreyB
on Oct 30, 2009 at 09:42 AM
posted by
ALICEN
on Oct 30, 2009 at 09:42 AM
I just learned this morning that the wife of one of my U.S. senators has made -- for lack of a better term -- a killing off pharmaceuticals. And I'm not talking about a retirement investment, either. Those in places of "power" in the government are the best positioned to be able to profit from ill-gotten gains. Another of my senators has received farm subsidies for years -- as have many others in government. Jay Rockefeller is one. Like a Rockefeller needs a farm subsidy. But, then, they're the ones who make the laws. I suppose they figure that while they're at it they may as well do something useful -- for themselves. There's also the little matter of someone in the administration deciding there hasn't been a cost of living increase; therefore there will be no COLA in SS. However, the lawmakers have an AUTOMATIC COLA adjustment. That's so they don't have to go through the trouble every year of voting for another one. They wouldn't want to take up the people's time that way. I know I'm cynical. I believe it's justified, though. posted by
Infowar
on Oct 30, 2009 at 09:43 AM
The government is suppose to be we the peoples servant, not the enemy. Sadly the government has become a disgusting sore on the face of this Republic.
posted by
Infowar
on Oct 30, 2009 at 09:45 AM
Sam I often wonder why Dobbs is allowed by the establishment to speak the amount of truth he does.
Now Beck on the other hand is a Judas Goat.
posted by
AudreyB
on Oct 30, 2009 at 09:46 AM
Info Not perfect, but better than most of the world's population must endure. Too bad you guys are so unhappy. . posted by
ALICEN
on Oct 30, 2009 at 09:51 AM
I also receive a SS check -- for which I worked for many years. I also am a member of one of those farcical Prescription Drug Plans, which is one of the biggest rip-offs the government has ever put in place. I don't have time or space to tell all the ways it's rotten to the core. For me it's a rip-off. And it's still interesting to note that on the night this was voted into law, the floor of congress was crawling with pharmaceutical company lobbyists -- which is a big no-no. It's also interesting to note that it was a (mostly) Republican congress that did this. Unforgivable. But it was too profitable for too many of them, Republican and Democrat alike. posted by
samheath
on Oct 30, 2009 at 10:05 AM
I knew you wouldn't have a civilized answer Audrey; which is why I banned you from my post. You can dish it out but you can't take it. How unhappy you must be. Alicen could tear you apart, but she is too civilized to do so. posted by
Infowar
on Oct 30, 2009 at 10:11 AM
Sam maybe you shouldn't ban people? I get annoyed by some of the people here but over all I don't care what people say in my blogs.I feel it's best just to let people spew out pretty much what ever they feel like saying. If people threaten me with violence or post something extremely obscene, that will for sure cause an issue but if people want to be A-holes...well I say let them do so. We all can come across as jerks sometimes, especially in the political arena. “If you’re not catching flak you’re not over the target”
posted by
AudreyB
on Oct 30, 2009 at 10:17 AM
Take what Sam? Your witty repartee? Your scathing comebacks? Your irrefutable counterpoints. LOL As to your question. I started working in the potato sheds in Shafter when I was fifteen. I had to get a special permit from high school (stating that I was a stellar student) to get one. I also worked at Mr Olsen's drive in at the same time. From there I went to work for the County of Kern at age 19 in their public library system. I worked there for 3 years. Then I got married and took 5 years off to have my children. During that time I went back to BC and got my AA degree. Then it was on to work for the next 30 years without a break or a vacation. I worked 5 days a week at "work" and two days a week at home for the next 30 years. I retired after being in the workforce 45 years. Five of that off to start my family. You, being a man, probably didn't take time off to stay home with young children Therefore, you have a few more years in the old SS bank than I do. Between the two of us we have 4 retirements we draw from. We do fine. And I thank my lucky stars, and our government, for the opportunities I've been given to make a living and raise my children. edit: oops I lied We took one vacation with our kids about 15 years ago. posted by
Infowar
on Oct 30, 2009 at 10:24 AM
Sadly the government you cherish so much Audrey is not going to reflect the positive aspects you admire. This government is quickly becoming a tyrannical monster. A scientific dictatorship is enveloping the globe as the New World Order takes shape.
posted by
Infowar
on Oct 30, 2009 at 10:50 AM
posted by
pogo
on Oct 30, 2009 at 10:50 AM
Info, I cherish the idea of a representative government, which I believe we have. No institution is perfect, but we keep trying, which distinguishes humans from the lower animals. We can only continue to strive to make a better world for all of us. I admire your intelligence and dedication to your ideas, but I abhor your nihalism and negative attitude about our future. That is my problem with a lot of the people that post here - they are nothing but negative, no hope, just anger. posted by
Infowar
on Oct 30, 2009 at 10:54 AM
Hope is an empty word. I love humanity & I know if people start to wake up from their mental slumber, we can start to turn the negatives around. People need to get the fight back in their system. I don't see how I am negative? I am busy all day long trying to educate myself & others. Look in the mirror, we the people are the solution but first we must face the enemy in the eyes. posted by
samheath
on Oct 30, 2009 at 10:54 AM
Like RF and some others Audrey, just keep sniping at me wherever I post a comment. It seems this is the only thing that makes you all happy on the BC blog. Some might not even get comments on their posts unless I comment on them allowing you all to get in your digs at me. posted by
sagefever
on Oct 30, 2009 at 11:02 AM
I am sorry that folks feel so oppressed. Things are never perfect are they? Yet keep trying and ,at least for me, a smile/positive attitude sure works wonders. I do love my government. While at times I felt like selling pansies and pencils on the cornner, SSI enabled me to keep my child at home. It took care of one of it's most vunerable children and a unproductive one at that. I know this is going to earn me a ban again,so first Sam ....know I will always have affection for you and wish you the best. I'll see you on the other side my friend. posted by samheath on Oct 30, 2009 at 10:05 AMI knew you wouldn't have a civilized answer Audrey; which is why I banned you from my post. You can dish it out but you can't take it. How unhappy you must be. Alicen could tear you apart, but she is too civilized to do so. On any level I fail see how this is civilized. I know there are long standing divides here,reinforced by all sides. How sad this is. How fruitless and pointless.
posted by
AudreyB
on Oct 30, 2009 at 11:04 AM
posted by
pogo
on Oct 30, 2009 at 11:06 AM
Hope is an empty word. I can't buy that Info. Hope is all we have. You are right that we must educate ourselves in the truth so that we fight anything that tries to take away our rights. What positive thing have you posted? I've never read it. I look in the mirror everyday my friend and I hope that I can say that I am doing what I can to make my little part of the world better. Sam, I got a couple of messages from people who like you. They tried to explain you to me so that maybe I would understand you better and not attack you. I appreciate them taking the time, and I will do my best to reign in my instincts. But hear this my friend, if you cannot abide being "sniped" at, maybe you have chosen the wrong venue for your ruminations. I will refrain from making comments to you or about you from this point on, so ponder on what I have just told you. posted by
Infowar
on Oct 30, 2009 at 11:11 AM
posted by
Infowar
on Oct 30, 2009 at 11:15 AM
What positive thing have you posted? That is a matter of perspective.
Pogo If you have access to all of the positive solutions then I encourage you to post them. Maybe we can work together? I post the problem & then you post the solution to that problem. What do you think? posted by
AudreyB
on Oct 30, 2009 at 11:16 AM
Please define country then define government Then tell me what form of government you would choose to replace this one with. If you're looking for perfection, Info, you're always going to be disappointed. Any form of government is a work in progress. If you don't like what going on in America, do something to change it. posted by
pogo
on Oct 30, 2009 at 11:21 AM
Info, sounds like a plan. However, you may not approve of some of my solutions, plus I am flattered that you would think I would have any answers, I can barely figure out my electric toothbrush. Look, here is an example of why I have hope: George W. Bush will go down in history as the worst President this country has ever had; worse than Harding or Grant or Buchanan. I was depressed for 8 years and railed against the fates. Then Obama came along and I began to hope (by the way Bill Clinton made me a cynic for awhile). Then he got elected and I saw this country again for the wonderful place that it can be, where all men are truely created eqaul. So yes, I have hope, and that is as positive as I can be. country=government posted by
Infowar
on Oct 30, 2009 at 11:26 AM
If you're looking for perfection, Info, you're always going to be disappointed. Any form of government is a work in progress.
Yeah some forms of government progress towards totalitarianism. I don't enjoy watching this country go that route under the hijacked U.S. government.
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/country Country: : 2 a : the land of a person's birth, residence, or citizenship b : a political state or nation or its territory Government: www.answers.com/topic/government
posted by
wlwedd
on Oct 30, 2009 at 11:29 AM
As a liberal I deplore this violence, as I believe that freedom of speech comes not only from the Constitution but in the way we live with each other. No one should be attacked because of their views, period, not even Dobbs, who I cannot stand. Having said that, this story is interesting because the articles above deplore the hatred used against Dobbs, and yet totally ignore the hate he spews. I'm sorry, but "live by the sword, die by the sword." I would never encourage or tolerate violence of this kind, but there are many who, feeling hate directed toward them, will respond in kind. Dobbs opened this door, and others saw fit to try to close it. He is still a victim, but he should recognize that his speech does harm to others, threatening livelihoods and families. He can still take his unpopular stands, but he ought to recognize the inherent humanity of all people, and not just scapegoat them as faceless "illegals." They're people! There has to be a better way to solve this problem than stereotyping and racism, all Dobbs hallmarks. Perhaps this will help Dobbs become a problem-solver, rather than a lightning-rod hatemonger. posted by
pogo
on Oct 30, 2009 at 11:33 AM
posted by
Infowar
on Oct 30, 2009 at 11:42 AM
Dobbs points out how this government is allowing illegal aliens to run rampant. How is that hate mongering? I would say the radicals shooting at him are hate mongers.
great post! Maybe this will make Dobbs pro gun control. No instead of Dobbs joining the anti gun idiots, he should stockpile more weapons so the next time the racist Mexican separatist pay him a visit, he will be able to take them out. Actually people shooting at Dobbs only reinforces the need for law abiding U.S. citizens to be armed & ready to defend their families.
posted by
AudreyB
on Oct 30, 2009 at 11:49 AM
a political state or nation or its territory Doesn't a "political nation" imply that a government is in place. Otherwise the politicians wouldn't have a means of being elected or a place to make political decisions once they got into office. posted by
Infowar
on Oct 30, 2009 at 12:01 PM
posted by
TSM
on Oct 30, 2009 at 12:13 PM
Sorry to burst your bubble, but law enforcement has a different take on the incident. Interviews with the New Jersey State Police yielded a rather different assessment of the events described by Dobbs. In a phone interview conducted yesterday, Sgt. Stephen Jones, a NJ State Police spokesperson, chuckled out loud after he heard about Dobbs' account of the gunfire incident. Jones commented that he "wouldn't classify it [the gunfire incident] as very unusual." He also confirmed that there are hunters in the area, and stated that, "at this time of year hunter [shooting] complaints go up." Another New Jersey State Police spokesperson, Sgt. Julian Castellanos, noted that "it's a wide open area and there are hunters in the area." Castellanos explained that the bullet had hit the house in vicinity of the attic; it "hit the vinyl siding and fell to the ground" without penetrating the vinyl, he said. From the description, it sounds like the bullet came from a long distance away. Dobbs wasn't targeted, as much as he wants the rightwing conspiracy kooks to believe.
posted by
elinem
on Oct 30, 2009 at 12:18 PM
posted by
learnem
on Oct 30, 2009 at 12:25 PM
if indeed it was an attack, some here on the blog call him a hatemonger...for voicing his opinion and exercising his 1st amendment rights remember, some people may not agree with your point of view either, and call you names i personally dont feel that a hatemonger would attempt to save the US untold billions of dollars each year spent on the social ills of illegal immigration posted by
Infowar
on Oct 30, 2009 at 12:42 PM
posted by
TSM
on Oct 30, 2009 at 12:43 PM
for voicing his opinion Dobbs is an out and out liar. http://www.maldef.org/truth... Can't say I'm surprised you support him. And here you are yet again posting during school hours. You're as much a teacher as I'm a rocket scientist.
posted by
TSM
on Oct 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM
TSM is posting from establishment liberal huffcrap post. You want a different source? Here you go: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/...
Why do you hate law enforcement personnel so much you're willing to call them liars?
posted by
learnem
on Oct 30, 2009 at 12:50 PM
TSM...you might as well quote LA RAZA when you quot MALDEF....forged from the same and im on lunch right now...thanks posted by
sagefever
on Oct 30, 2009 at 01:09 PM
CNN is saying much the same thing about hunters etc. in the area~ the bullet came from a long gun and they are taking the case seriously because of Dobb's public persona. It is a bit early to who what and when so far gentlemen. Violence is never the answer. posted by
Ray_Harwick
on Oct 30, 2009 at 01:13 PM
"[P}eople who are demeaned and objectified in society may develop an aversion to their tormentors that is more hateful in its expression than the prejudice they have been subjected to." So, if Lou Dobbs persistently expresses his anti-immigration views, there are some people out there who come to think of that criticism as hate-mongering. It is fortunate that most people who are the objects of Lou Dobbs criticism - illegal immigrants - don't have the impulse to pick up a gun and shoot at him. But simple math comes into play when the object of Dobbs concern is a group so large, there is bound to be among them some person who does have the impulse toward violence; who will shoot at Lou Dobbs at least to scare or threaten him. I don't know what Lou Dobbs says because I haven't followed his program very much. I don't know what issues he addresses that might be considered inflamatory to illegal immigrants. But clearly, there is an element of Dobbs commentary that hits some very sensitive buttons among people who don't care to rationally consider the principles Dobbs is speaking to. Perhaps like so many **legal** American citizens who also lack the intellectual will or capacity to consider political issues rationally, the world is filled with people just like Americans who lack this will; they are people guided by their emotions, and some of them are unhinged enough to express their "rebuttal" with a gun. posted by
Infowar
on Oct 30, 2009 at 01:16 PM
I never once said I hate law enforcement personnel. Actually I hate the term 'law enforcement'...they used to be called peace officers. What are you saying? Law enforcement personnel are not capable of telling lies? Exactly as learman pointed out...you are sourcing maldef. Maldef is to racist La Raza like what a Neo-nazi is to Mein Kampf.
TSM,Randomfactor & Virgil take notes from this guy.
& they all three adore books written by the following character.
posted by
ALICEN
on Oct 30, 2009 at 01:40 PM
Info: I just happen to think that CNN is pretty brave for making a spot for people like Dobbs to state his views, which obviously differ from those of the organization for which he works. And it makes me wonder why it is that the current administration is so dead set against Fox. Doing so simply makes it look as though there's something he doesn't like about differing views actually being spoken over the air waves. Heck fire, we're more open here on this blog than the administration is with Fox. That's saying something! I don't feel oppressed, nor am I unhappy. Rather, what I feel is sadness for the general unease caused by the idea that the "government" wants to shut some people up. I posted a blog two or three weeks or (or maybe more) that had consisted of a letter I had written to then-President Bush. It pretty much set out how I feel and what I think about my country. What it's coming to now makes me sad. posted by
pogo
on Oct 30, 2009 at 02:20 PM
Alicen, the current administration is "against" (your words) Fox because Fox lies. It is not differing views, it is out and out lying. Government is not shutting anyone up, so don't feel sad. Now isn't that better? What the country is coming to now makes me happy, so things even out, don't they? posted by
learnem
on Oct 30, 2009 at 02:24 PM
posted by
pogo
on Oct 30, 2009 at 02:35 PM
posted by
pogo
on Oct 30, 2009 at 02:48 PM
learn, there is a lot of proof actually. Just google "lies from Fox News" and your horizon will be expanded. You don't have to thank me.
1
Advertisement |