|
It's official Tour of California to make stop in Bakersfield Add another name to the list of Condors fans No sponsor, no ride for Mears in 2010 Effing Favre to Simply Favrelous NASCAR rumors: Boys of Bakersfield could be cancelled? Colts prefer Playboy model's husband rather than former BC standout Casual fans could be priced out for Jam Manny's blunder great news for Yankees Blitz, Jam, Blaze ... minor league sports flop in Bakersfield Is your bracket busted? January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Ballpark talk is cheap, actual building won't be
Bakersfield Blaze owner D.G. Elmore has heard it all before.
According to estimates from City Manager Alan Tandy, a new ballpark could cost between $18 to $35 million. Tandy will release those figures at tonight's City Council meeting. Is this just more lip service in hopes of keeping the Blaze here or will the City Council actually consider making a push toward a new stadium? 11 comments from 6 users
1
posted by
witterpitters
on Jan 14, 2009 at 06:07 PM
IMO it is lip service as usual. They need to go and visit some of the complexes in other cities and check the numbers and dollars for usage. If they made it a multiplex, baseball/basketball/soccer that would draw more then just baseball people. If Bakersfield can appeal and get monies for two pools (B.C. and McMutrtry) here why can't some of the baseball well to do's get together and pledge funds? posted by
jfrancais
on Jan 14, 2009 at 06:15 PM
With all the high school sports in the city for surely they could host other events and games to make it viable. Based on how things are, they need to just let the Blaze go. Let this be a lessoned learned when another team comes to Bakersfield. I'm partial for a return of the old B'Dodgers. posted by
witterpitters
on Jan 14, 2009 at 06:31 PM
Before the economy meltdown, powers that be should have spent more time and money on this stadium instead of how they could fill their own coffers with all the new building contracts. Now many of those projects sit idle - wasted time and money.
posted by
NancyII
on Jan 14, 2009 at 06:39 PM
Seems I heard before they they wouldn't allow alcohol to be served if the stadium was built on the CSUB campus. That caused a big stir because after all, what's baseball without an 8 dollar beer? posted by
witterpitters
on Jan 14, 2009 at 06:52 PM
Well they may just have to do away with that rule...........wait, doesn't CSUB have a Pub??? At least they did! posted by
jfrancais
on Jan 14, 2009 at 06:55 PM
posted by
Shwaine
on Jan 14, 2009 at 07:36 PM
When I was a student at CSUB, there was a pub that served alcohol and events could apply for an alcohol permit for their events (and pay for one). That was a decade ago, but I imagine it's still the same. Probably the cost of the alcohol permit keeps most events from bothering with it. posted by
NancyII
on Jan 14, 2009 at 07:44 PM
I believe the pub still serves beer but its' only allowed there. My guess is they don't want a bunch of drunken baseball fans driving around the campus. posted by
vanityfair
on Jan 14, 2009 at 07:45 PM
posted by
jfrancais
on Jan 14, 2009 at 07:47 PM
I noticed a lot of the CSUs quit serving alcohol over the past three years. They quit serving beer at the Fresno State Football games as well. I figured it was a change in law (or in its interpretation by the CSU system). posted by
ghostriter
on Jan 15, 2009 at 10:36 AM
With all the financial problems everyone is suffering right now, the thing we all need is to spend a few million on a baseball stadium. NOT. Talk about bad timing. Our tax money needs to go to schools, road repair, and things we need now. The last thing we need is another government frivolity.
1
Advertisement |