|
Monster Boss? People in Business: A who's who for Oct. 6 Looking to buy? Check out our latest home sales map California broke; asking for loan Home price declines Live on Twitter Housing, etc... Credit freeze: Bogus or real? 82 more homes sold! Check out our map! People in Business: A who's who for Sept. 26 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 Contact us with your news and information: Team leader: Christine Peterson, cpeterson@bakersfield.com, 395-7418 Assistant team leader: John Cox, jcox@bakersfield.com, 395- 7345 Reporters: Courtenay Edelhart, cedelhart@bakersfield.com, 395-7372 Jenny Shearer, jshearer@bakersfield.com, 395-7234 Gretchen Wenner, gwenner@bakersfield.com, 395-7368
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
How to help Oildale
Areas of Oildale need help, and Supervisor Mike Maggard believes a redevelopment agency could be one solution to eliminate blight, create jobs and offer residents hope. Tuesday, supervisors asked county staffers to study what it would take to create a redevelopment agency. It's a small step forward. It's not clear when supervisors may next get a report about agency feasibility. Bakersfield has a redevelopment agency; Maggard pointed to successful projects such as the Rabobank Arena and downtown's Kress Building. But this would be new territory for Kern. Examples of redevelopment projects include street improvements, public facilities and housing and commercial projects. Monies come from the taxes entitles, such as the county and school districts, would agree to share with an agency for a period of time. Agencies are accountable, consultants told the board. The board heard from two residents who urged fiscal responsibility when it comes to redevelopment projects. Citizens for a New Oildale think an agency could help the unincorporated community. What do you think about redevelopment? Is it a good idea for Oildale — and government? What projects would you like to see attempted? — Jenny Shearer, staff writer 11 comments from 7 users
1
posted by
witterpitters
on Jul 16, 2008 at 09:50 AM
AAAHHHHH yes! the 'committee' the 'study group'! Once again wasted time. They all have to wait until the 'committee/study group' picks the 'right' people for the 'committee', gets together, yaks it over, consults with whomever, makes a list, makes a graph, makes a financial report, an environmental report, a stop light report, a 'how many cars in this area' report, a 'how can we raise taxes to pay for this' report. Then they go to the supervisors who indicate they are not happy with the 'reports' - do it again. Agencies are always 'accountable' but how many times does anybody really ask for an 'accounting'? Got receipts? posted by
adampayne
on Jul 16, 2008 at 11:06 AM
If the people in Oildale really want to do something to improve their situation they should talk to the local LAFCo and seriously explore incorporation of their own city. It can be a lengthy process with lots of qualifiers, but I believe the people of Oildale would be far better off with their own city rather than being just another blighted and forgotten piece of Bakersfield. I saw two areas in greater Sacramento (West Scaramento and Rancho Cordova) go through this process with very positive results for their communities. Areas of deterioration were cleaned up and ordinances affecting both businesses and residential area were created to make positive change a reality. Since Bakersfield already has a redevelopment agency in place I am not sure why another should be created specifically for Oildale. It makes no sense. Incorporation into a new city that takes care of the people within its own boundaries makes a lot more sense to me, since it is patently obvious both the existing city and county government agencies have failed Oildale. posted by
Maggiepoo
on Jul 16, 2008 at 11:35 AM
posted by
catpaw
on Jul 16, 2008 at 11:40 AM
With all the deveopement in that area, I'm not sure just what the boundary of Oildale, except for the Kern River. adampayne makes sense to me. Why a new agency when we have one in place? I've always thought of Oildale as a part of Bakersfield, a suburb, so to speak. I know Oildale has its share of neglect, but Jenny makes it sound like a 3rd world country. Is it so dire that we need to "offer residents hope?" Or is it offer developers hope? posted by
Maggiepoo
on Jul 16, 2008 at 11:43 AM
Everything is fine there... the enviroment suits the inhabitants, the inhabitants make the enviroment ? What`s the problem ? posted by
edmomom
on Jul 16, 2008 at 11:45 AM
Hey MaggiePoo, evidently you haven't looked at the map regarding what happens if the Isabella Dam goes. Oildale is pretty much safe. Maybe you should investigate further. You might be in a flood zone posted by
Maggiepoo
on Jul 16, 2008 at 11:50 AM
Well we`ll just have to find a different dam then ! Willing to bet that you wouldn`t want to be standing at the corner of Roberts /Chester when the dam goes... posted by
lanabuford
on Jul 16, 2008 at 01:14 PM
Or any other time maggiepoo. Oildale isn't that bad......If you ignore the tweakers and drunks.
posted by
edmomom
on Jul 16, 2008 at 02:51 PM
posted by
Crankpin
on Jul 19, 2008 at 11:37 AM
Some thoughts on what Oildale needs: 1) Uniform signage, stop sign, and sidewalk ordinances. This includes incentives to refurbish historic signs in the area. I'm just glad the County is thinking about it. I'm looking forward to the public scoping period. And Magiepoo -- check out the inundation area of the dam from the Kern Council of Governments. Here's a link: http://www.kerncog.org/maps... We're all in trouble if the dam goes.
posted by
Maggiepoo
on Jul 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM
1
Our readers recommend: |