For a free workplace
To bring dignity and the promise of freedom back to Workers and Employers ending the tyranny of the Unions by protecting Business growth and Employee rights
About NAWER


Member Since:
July 26, 2007
Last Signed In:
October 23, 2007
Profile Views:
52
Blog Views:
1084
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Anti-Immigration petition to Congress
Governor Schwarzenegger Casts Veto of Harmful Card Check Bill in California, Reports The National Alliance for Worker and Employer Rights
How could these Republicans help Labor Unions to victory?
The summer that shook the American workplace:The threat and hidden agenda of Labors new Government
Paycheck shock: Local union 1000 dues up 50 percent
U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Labor-Management Standards Reports Four Indictments, Six Convictions During July for Union Funds Embezzlement
Union Corruption Update-for all those union apologists wake up!
Union Hypocrisy? You bet ! Unions outsourcing Homeless for their Picket Lines!
Open-Shop Law threaten unions
Grassroots petition against the Employee Free Choice Act
Archives
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


NAWER - > For a free workplace -> NAWER demands Governor of California save secret ballot elections for farmers
NAWER demands Governor of California save secret ballot elections for farmers
Contact: Will Fine 202-492-3196
For Immediate Release:
July25th, 2007
http://www.freeworkplace.or...

National Alliance for Worker and Employer Rights demands Governor Schwarzenegger save Secret Ballot Elections for workers in California:
urges veto of Senate Bill 180 robbing our workplace freedom that many have died to keep

S. 180 is a bill denying civil liberties to the most vulnerable people in California--those who work the farms of our state. Farm workers deserve better than to loose their hard earned rights to the schemes of the labor bosses. Under this bill, labor bosses would be allowed to unionize through intimidation farmworkers to gain more members and their forced dues. Under threats of job loss these workers would be compelled to sign the "card checks" in their homes. It does not matter that these workers do not often know what they are signing or that union thugs coerce them untill they get their cards signed.

It is obvious under these harsh conditions for workers why the United Farm Workers Union looses more than half of all elections through Secret Ballot Elections. There is no doubt that SB 180 is a payoff to the union to save it by increasing membership at the expense of workers rights. Passing S.B 180 means the State of California would allow more workers to loose their election rights to the labor unions. How long would all Californians be free when every voter did not have the right to a secret ballot election in private and force was used to control the outcome of every vote?

"Do not listen to the calls and schemes from labor bosses on card check, Governor Schwarzenegger. Close your ears and turn away. Listen instead to the Americans that have sacrificed their lives to come to California to live in freedom. Why should S. 180 be forced on farm workers to make them give up their right to an election that should be private and free? Say no to these union shock troops that hold farmers hostage through Card Check, Governor, and veto S. 180. In vetoing this Bill, you send a message across the country; workers rights can never be compromised to the labor mobs again." said Will Fine, Executive Director of the National Alliance for Worker and Employer Rights.

S. 180 is likely to pass the California Senate soon and move onto to the Governor for a veto. The Governor has not yet stated a position on the Bill.

END

 

Posted in these Groups:
Topics: republican, democrat, Politics, governor, secret ballot, labor unions
posted by NAWER on Thursday, July 26, 2007 at 07:51 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 104 times
22 comments from 8 users

1

posted by randomfactor on Jul 26, 2007 at 07:57 AM
Ah, another false-front "for the people" group emerges pushing the pro-corporation propaganda.
posted by TomW on Jul 26, 2007 at 09:13 AM
So what happens to these poor people who can't understand what they are signing (but understand perfectly what they are voting for apparently) if the "Union Thugs" actually get them to unionize?  Then what happens to them?
posted by robbwillis on Jul 26, 2007 at 09:16 AM
Ultimately, the same thing that has always happened to poor people that can't understand stuff; they're screwed. Sorry Tom, I know it was a rhetorical question...
posted by TomW on Jul 26, 2007 at 09:29 AM
I guess I should rephrase my question.  How is a union going to screw them worse than they're already getting screwed?
posted by robbwillis on Jul 26, 2007 at 09:41 AM

About the same, but they get to pay dues for it.

 

 

Spam code: CPQQC

Scrabble score: 29

posted by randomfactor on Jul 26, 2007 at 09:52 AM
Note the "member since" date.
posted by Hardliner4freedom on Jul 26, 2007 at 09:55 AM

I'm no big fan of unions, but I smell that fishy argument stronger than the water treatment plant on Ashe Rd.

 

posted by TomW on Jul 26, 2007 at 09:56 AM
If you're going to send out astroturf, you should at least proofread it.  Or is the loose/lose confusion supposed to make it seem folksy?
posted by Hardliner4freedom on Jul 26, 2007 at 09:59 AM

Ah, yes.  One of the most common (and professionally unbecoming) spelling errors: "looses" instead of the correct "loses."

If you want to commit journalist-grade errors, try the even more common "reign in" instead of the correct "rein in."

 

posted by mattloch on Jul 26, 2007 at 09:59 AM
I don't think they'll be back soon Tom, so they had nothing to loose.
posted by randomfactor on Jul 26, 2007 at 10:12 AM

For those wanting to see what the bill says:

http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/...

It *ADDS* an additional right to farm workers.

posted by GrpThink on Jul 26, 2007 at 02:40 PM

 

NAWER is a rightwing front group funded by Grover Norquist and the National Association of Manufacturers.

http://tinyurl.com/26dqwn

http://tinyurl.com/2mnq2r

 

posted by NAWER on Jul 29, 2007 at 09:05 PM
Provides that, as an alternative to the secret ballot election
process established under existing law, a labor organization
may be certified as the exclusive bargaining representative
through a "majority signup election.

You are taking the right to a secret ballot election AWAY from workers not adding a right!
Yes again the right to a forced card check but now for California Liberals thats just dandy...
Anything to confuse the rank and file Farmers even more, eh?
posted by tkozy on Jul 29, 2007 at 09:36 PM

From GRP's link:

 

I did a little more research, and found out who specifically registered the site on the web. WHOIS, a company that keeps a database on who buys domain names and administers web sites, lists both the registrant and the technical contact of NAWAR's web site as a David Kralik. Okay, this David Kralik must be our hero, our disgruntled factory worker who one day decided to take matters into his own hads and speak out against labor unions!

Nope. Wrong again.

David Kralik is actually an employee of the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM). In the company directory, he is listed as "Manager, Internet Programs & Web Content Editor."

In case you are not familiar with NAM, it is the nation’s largest industrial trade association, representing small and large manufacturers in every industrial sector and in all 50 states. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., the NAM has 10 additional offices across the country. The NAM's mission is to "...enhance the competitiveness of manufacturers by shaping a legislative and regulatory environment conducive to U.S. economic growth and to increase understanding among policymakers, the media and the general public about the vital role of manufacturing to America’s economic future and living standards."

Not a peep about advocating for workers.

In fact, on just some of the issues that involve the health and/or welfare of workers, here is where NAM stands:


  • Retirement Security Issues: The NAM believes that our nation’s voluntary, private pension system plays a critical role in ensuring a secure retirement for American workers. Manufacturers traditionally have provided generous pension benefits for their employees ... we need to avoid imposing unreasonable restrictions and funding obligations on employers....
  • American Jobs Creation Act of 2004: In October 2004, Congress approved landmark legislation that repealed the export tax provision and provided the most significant tax relief for businesses in more than a decade. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who did not vote on the bill this week, called it the "worst example of the influence of the special interests I have ever seen." Will it create new jobs? "Jobs for tax professionals, yes," says Bob Scharin, editor of RIA's Practical Tax Strategies.
  • Asbestos: There is broad and bipartisan agreement that asbestos litigation needs to be reined in. There are simply too many people who are not sick taking money...and financially ruining companies with little or no liability. There are at least 8,400 active defendants, more than 70 bankruptcies caused by asbestos litigation...These stark statistics call for Congress to “do something.”
  • Health Care - Patients’ Bill of Rights: The Patients’ Bill of Rights debate (a.k.a. managed care reform) was one of the biggest health care fights...In reality this fight was not about patients but instead was about trial lawyers and their efforts to encourage workers to sue their employers for claims denied by their health plan....The NAM led a number of successful efforts to defeat the Patients’ Bill of Rights through the years, helping to prevent its enactment into law despite Congress passing several versions. The NAM will again oppose this unnecessary and dangerous legislation as introduced in any form in future years.
  • Health Care - Prescription Drugs: The NAM ... oppose[s] efforts to apply price controls to pharmaceuticals or other health care services. We also oppose efforts to facilitate the importation of prescription drugs, which would ...in effect, import foreign price controls into the United States.
  • Clean Air - Mercury: ...The NAM's goal is to defeat any regulation of mercury emissions at levels beyond what can be achieved as a “co-benefit”....

Now, I can't legally say that the National Association of Manufacturers is the proprietor and single founder of the National Association of Worker and Employer Rights, because I don't have the proof of that. I cannot legally say that David Kralik is acting as an employee of the National Association of Manufacturers when he bought the domain name for NAWAR and listed himself as the technical support. I cannot legally say that NAWAR is in fact just a shill for the National Association of Manufacturers. I can't legally say that NAWAR is a cleverly disguised way for big bidness to try to convince the little guy that unions are bad for him. I don't have proof of any of that.

All I have is David Kralik, who is listed as the registrant of NAWAR's web site, and also, by sheer coincidence, just happens to be employed by the NAM as their "Manager of Internet Programs & Web Content Editor." Of course, David may have started NAWAR all of his own accord, in his personal free time, because of his strong opinions about unions. He may also have been hired as a moonlighter to put the web site together.

Yep, these things are possible. It's also possible that it will snow in Honolulu, too.
posted by NAWER on Jul 29, 2007 at 10:13 PM
Notice how all the California Labor liberals cannot respond to any forced card check schemes thrust down the throats of farmers?
When they go to work in their plush offices which your union dues helped support: Ask  yourself this
Who is really listening when they force you to loose your job because you stood up to them?
posted by mattloch on Jul 29, 2007 at 11:12 PM
NAWER: "Notice how all the California Labor liberals I cannot respond to any forced card check schemes thrust down the throats of farmers of the arguments posted above?
When they I go to work in their my plush offices which your union dues Grover Norquist helped support: Ask  yourself this
Who is really listening when they force you to loose your job because you stood up to them I post this propaganda?
"

Welcome to the jungle, plant.
posted by tkozy on Jul 30, 2007 at 12:03 AM
 

That's not a trout. That's to ugly to be a trout!

posted by NAWER on Jul 30, 2007 at 08:15 AM
They still do not GET it!  LOL
While Farmers are threatened with intimidation in card checks they talk about "Trout" and fishing-who let them off the reservation?
This really is the dumbing down of America or is it California?
posted by tkozy on Jul 30, 2007 at 08:59 AM

Poor country club farmer. bigemo_harabe_net-102.gif

Maybe we need another Farm subsidy bill.bigemo_harabe_net-92.gif

 

Hey! What's with the racial insults toward Indians?bigemo_harabe_net-87.gif

posted by mattloch on Jul 30, 2007 at 09:58 AM
Wait a second NAWER, you said "Under threats of job loss these workers would be compelled to sign the "card checks" in their homes", and said that this bill would harm workers. Now you're saying that this bill needs to be defeated because it is bad for farmers? Which is it?

You honestly can't be upset with us because you aren't clear, can you?
posted by randomfactor on Jul 30, 2007 at 10:01 AM

This really is the dumbing down of America or is it California?

Don't know, NAWER.  Which one do you live in?

posted by mattloch on Jul 30, 2007 at 10:09 AM
I think what NAWER was saying is that they may not even be in CA, Random. So the question would be valid (and certainly make sense) when written from NAWER H.Q. elsewhere. They honestly don't know what's going on in this state, so they're asking about our collective IQ stats.
1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: