Things that interest ME
I'll be blogging about things I find interesting.  If they offend you, please feel free to just pass on by.   If they interest you too, then I hope you'll enjoy it here.

A blog about Business & Finance.
About NancyII


Member Since:
June 25, 2006
Last Signed In:
February 09, 2010
Profile Views:
21657
Blog Views:
96025
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Did You Know? More local history
Time for a chuckle
Early morning blahs
Did you know? Local history
Debbie (DREAMIFUCAN) got married today!
Public-sector pay, private-sector backlash
The Wood'ys Grill & Bar at 5555 Truxtun Ave. has closed for business.
Frazier Park man claims to be mystery writer Obama fan Ellie Light
Toyota shuts down sales of recalled vehicles
Need a chuckle today? Here's a little know fact for you
Archives
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
December 09
January 10
February 10
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


NancyII - > Things that interest ME -> More race talk is the last thing we need
More race talk is the last thing we need

More race talk is the last thing we need

by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
February 25, 2009

http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4...

 

"In things racial we have always been . . . essentially a nation of cowards" because "average Americans simply do not talk enough with each other about race." Thus spake Attorney General Eric Holder in a speech last week marking Black History Month -- a speech in which he also bewailed the fact that modern America frequently "does not . . . differ significantly from the country that existed some 50 years ago."

Holder's racial melancholy struck many people as peculiar, inasmuch as he is the first black American to head the Justice Department, and inasmuch as the American president who appointed him -- a president elected by a healthy margin last November -- is the most celebrated black man in the world. Was such gloom really called for in a speech marking the first Black History Month of the Obama presidency?

Yet that wasn't the only message to come out of the Obama administration last week.

Though it didn't get the same media attention, an equally high-ranking Cabinet secretary gave a speech for Black History Month that suggested a somewhat different take on America's racial condition -- one more upbeat and appreciative.

"Race-related issues continue to occupy a significant portion of our political discussion," he said, but "in racial terms the country that existed before the civil rights struggle is almost unrecognizable to us today. Separate public facilities, separate entrances, poll taxes, legal discrimination, forced labor, in essence an American apartheid" -- all of it, he acknowledged, had been relegated by the Civil Rights movement to the ash heap of history. Today, Americans of every color "work with one another, lunch together, and . . . socialize with one another," especially during the workweek.

The administration official who delivered those remarks? Attorney General Eric Holder. Both the racial lament and the glad tidings were part of the same speech. The obnoxious line about Americans being "a nation of cowards" drew the headlines, as perhaps it was intended to, but the speech as a whole was inconsistent and incoherent. Perhaps Holder intended to offer a nuanced argument about race in the Age of Obama. What he delivered was a muddle.

Every sensible American knows that racial problems still exist in the United States. But what can justify Holder's belief that the only way to surmount them is to have "frank conversations about the racial matters that continue to divide us?" He has it exactly backward. Harping on old grievances, constantly revisiting past resentments, relentlessly picking at scabs -- those are a recipe not for social harmony but for social antagonism. To be sure, there are those who have made it their life's work to keep racial umbrage at a constant boil: men like Louis Farrakhan, David Duke, Al Sharpton. But is theirs the sort of "frank conversation" Holder thinks we need more of?

In any event, the notion that Americans can't bring themselves to talk about race is preposterous. Did we not just come through a seemingly endless presidential campaign in which race was a seemingly endless topic of discussion? Wasn't Barack Obama praised to the skies for giving a whole speech on the subject of race? Were Americans reluctant to discuss "things racial," as Holder puts it, when Don Imus slurred the Rutgers women's basketball team? Or when Jeremiah Wright damned the "US of KKK-A?" Or when Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans? Or when John Rocker shot his mouth off? Or when three Duke lacrosse players were indicted for rape?

Americans have been jawboning about race for 2½ centuries, and we are in no danger of running out of things to say. More race talk is the last thing we need. As a nation and as individuals, the less race matters to us, the less thought we give it, the more racial progress we will make. Our goal should be not to dwell on "things racial" but to see beyond them.

Just as millions of Americans already do.

In the early 1960s, when Barack Obama's white mother married his black father, there were fewer than 15,000 interracial marriages in the United States. By 1980, there were 650,000. Today, there are nearly 2.3 million. Obama was only a toddler when Martin Luther King dreamed of a nation in which people were judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. Day by day, we are becoming that nation.

(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe.)
 

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by NancyII on Wednesday, February 25, 2009 at 09:46 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 64 times
17 comments from 8 users

1

posted by TSM on Feb 25, 2009 at 11:47 AM

Jacoby is dead wrong, as usual.

Only a few weeks ago, race relations had reached such a low point in the troubled east Texas town of Paris that federal Justice Department mediators were called in to try to bring together black and white citizens, but the public meeting quickly dissolved into rancor.

Now fresh racial tensions are erupting inside one of the town's biggest employers, the Turner Industries pipe fabrication plant, where black employees charge that hangman's nooses, Confederate flags and racist graffiti have been appearing throughout the workplace for months.

Paris first drew national scrutiny in 2007, the year after a 14-year-old African-American girl, Shaquanda Cotton, was sentenced by a local judge to up to 7 years in a youth prison for shoving a hall monitor at Paris High School.

Three months earlier, the same judge had sentenced a 14-year-old white girl to probation for the more serious crime of arson.

http://www.chicagotribune.c...

The black workers are discriminated against in pay and promotions as well.

 

posted by NancyII on Feb 25, 2009 at 12:01 PM

His POINT, for those who missed it (pinheads) like TSM is that the more we bring it out and belabor it the more we divide.

The racial issue of the past is something no sane person can be proud of, we all know it was wrong.  But like so much in life, we can't undo it.  Unfair labor practice STILL exists and it isn't just Black who feel it.  If you think women are always treated fairly when it comes to raises and promotions against a male then you are indeed a pinhead.

Things are changing, they've been changing for a long time.  You can't just snap your fingers and right all the wrongs in our history regardless of which sector of our population you want to target so all we can do is continue to work on it until all people are treated fairly.

As long as someone is pointing a finger and accusing others of mistreating them when we ourselves did no such thing, there will always be division.

posted by sagefever on Feb 25, 2009 at 12:08 PM

"truth in the booth"~ how many times did I hear that?

I hardly think using the term "pinheads" advances Jacoby's point .

posted by randomfactor on Feb 25, 2009 at 12:08 PM

His POINT, for those who missed it (pinheads) like TSM is that the more we bring it out and belabor it the more we divide.

In contrast to Holder's point, which is that we haven't brought it out yet, let alone belaboring it. 

posted by learnem on Feb 25, 2009 at 12:12 PM

its usually the racists that cry racism (TSM)<<<<<<<<<<< << wouldnt last a minute on MLK blvd after sundown

posted by NancyII on Feb 25, 2009 at 12:16 PM

 

Americans have been jawboning about race for 2½ centuries, and we are in no danger of running out of things to say. More race talk is the last thing we need. As a nation and as individuals, the less race matters to us, the less thought we give it, the more racial progress we will make. Our goal should be not to dwell on "things racial" but to see beyond them.

Just as millions of Americans already do.

(Just  thought I'd run that one by ya again.)

People should be GRATEFUL that, as a nation, enough people looked beyond race and elected the first Black president.  That some of our highest offices in the land are, and have been held, by Blacks.

People should be shouting from the rooftops more about our progress and how far we've come rather than than mixing it with old hurts from the past.

I have a saying I use in groups.  "It's ok to visit the past, that's how we learn.  Just don't take up residence there."

posted by TSM on Feb 25, 2009 at 12:21 PM

Americans have been jawboning about race for 2½ centuries

Not in any meaningful or constructive way, as you, learnem and Jacoby have clearly demonstrated.

The more you make the claim it's not needed, the more you make the case that it is.

 

posted by randomfactor on Feb 25, 2009 at 12:32 PM

Americans have been jawboning about race for 2½ centuries

For the first eighty+ percent of that, only white people got a say.

People should be GRATEFUL that, as a nation, enough people looked beyond race and elected the first Black president.

Damned right.  The alternative would've been disasterous.

posted by ALICEN on Feb 25, 2009 at 01:27 PM

Nancy, as I said on somebody else's blog a couple of days ago, I personally think we've made great strides in the last couple of decades regarding race relations.  Then this:  Maybe Holder just doesn't run with the right crowd.  (I think it was lost on the last go-round.)

 

posted by NancyII on Feb 25, 2009 at 01:35 PM

RF, try, just for once try, forming a response that doesn't drag that tired old news into it.  Even you should be sick of that crap by now.

Your first two words were right on target..the last 5 were totally unecessary. 

posted by randomfactor on Feb 25, 2009 at 01:37 PM

RF, try, just for once try, forming a response that doesn't drag that tired old news into it. 

Gee, but I thought you were *HAPPY* the American voters showed some sense this time.

posted by randomfactor on Feb 25, 2009 at 01:38 PM

I personally think we've made great strides in the last couple of decades regarding race relations.

Let me guess.  You're white?

posted by sagefever on Feb 25, 2009 at 01:43 PM

"...and many miles to go before I sleep..."  the world,our nation ,our very selves are a work in progress~ thank goodness. Always room for improvement.

Talking about problems is what most professionals advocate from personal relationships to societal problems. Some visiting of the past is required to understand how one got to today~ then it is time to consider how best to move forward. If that is what Jacoby is implying~ he has a point.

 

posted by VirgilAnderson on Feb 25, 2009 at 01:48 PM

 

 

Race in America has been talked about ( or, it  has been the salient, if some what at times a mute,  pariah in American politics and social development) for a good four hundred years.

80 percent of that time the dialog was dominated by the white folks.

You can't talk about race relations  in America without dealing with the last four hundred years too. It's impossible.

--virgil

posted by learnem on Feb 25, 2009 at 02:30 PM

why do a few people on this board have white guilt?   me or my ancestors werent anywhere AROUND the US during slavery.....

slavery was a FACT, not only in the United States for many years (hundreds), but all over the world...the Jews were slaves in Egypt...the indians were made slaves by the spanish in mexico....also in south america...slavery continues today in Africa...

i treat people by their character, not their color.....gee who yaps about race the most???  effin Jesse HIJACKson and the good Rev Al (Not so Sharp)ton.  if they would get off their soap boxes, a majority of the black/white issues would disappear...theres been a double standard regarding black/white (no hate crimes against blacks...affirmative action....preferential treatment on college entrance, yada yada yada)

and lets just look at the inventions of the white man for the last, oh thousand years....would we EVEN be having this discussion online....better yet, even not face to face, had it not been for the white man??? 

whites, more than any other creed, have benefited society throughout the years to the point we are....so i dont want to hear your white guilt, because of your crooked ways giving you a guilt trip, about (in my best whiny ne0-marxist voice) oh oh oh...i feel horrible about families being on welfare for 5 generations"

you have to better yourself before you can better other people...and SOME of you on this board are nowhere near bettering yourself to  that point yet

posted by jermox on Feb 25, 2009 at 03:07 PM

 Talking about problems is what most professionals advocate from personal relationships to societal problems. Some visiting of the past is required to understand how one got to today~ then it is time to consider how best to move forward.

I think as I look here I really only agree with sagefever.  The progress we have made though history has only been made by having a dialogue.  There are still some underlying issues that have not been solved.  Learnem's rant about a double standard only goes to prove that those issues are still there.  After the cartoon from the Post came out some people saw blatent racism while others could not see how racism would be interpretted.  Instead of looking at how others may view this cartoon we throw out defensive stances.  I highly doubt anything will ever be resolved without looking at the issues underlying our society.  Of course, Holder's comment only hurts such a discussion. 

posted by randomfactor on Feb 25, 2009 at 03:11 PM

the Jews were slaves in Egypt...

Actually no, they weren't.  Oppressed in lots of places, chiefly European, *SINCE* then, though.

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement