|
Al Qaeda's Message Spreading Through English-Language Sites Very sad news from a blogger friend Live from New York, a terror trial we'll regret - Jacoby Fox gets interview with obama Lou Dobbs explains why he left CNN Obama and 'The Great I Am' Fresno State Bulldog Football game on at 1 PM today, Channel 45 Would you like a joint with your fries? A joke for you, may be old, I dunno. Don't stop me if you've heard it. What's going in at the old 3Way Chevrolet place on California? August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Health care: We don't need the Lexus - Jacoby
Health care: We don't need the Lexusby Jeff Jacoby http://www.jeffjacoby.com/5...
IMAGINE THE SORT OF CAR you'd drive if government regulations made it illegal to sell any automobile that didn't feature 380-horsepower direct-injection V6 engines, computer-controlled electric power steering, eight-speed automatic transmission, four-wheel-drive, automatic climate control (including humidity and smog sensors), "smart key" technology, touchscreen navigation, backup cameras, LED headlights, acoustic glass, surround-sound stereo, and leather seat stitching. If those were the minimum requirements every car had to meet before it could be offered for sale, would you commute to and from work every day in a Lexus LS 460 or some other luxury vehicle? Well, you might, if the steep price wasn't an obstacle. But it's more likely you wouldn't be driving at all. If the government barred you from buying anything but a high-end car, you might have no choice but to rely on the bus or subway, or to find a job closer to home. Lawmakers can decree that every car on the road be a Lexus or its equivalent, but they can't make driving more luxurious for all. They can only make it more expensive -- and for many drivers, unaffordable. And what is true of transportation is true of everything else: Raise the number of amenities that a product or service must include, and more consumers will be unable to pay for that product or service. That is why one of the simplest strategies for making health insurance more affordable is to reduce the minimum number of benefits that insurers are required to cover. 86 comments from 13 users
posted by
adampayne
on Jul 29, 2009 at 09:03 AM
Maybe we don't deserve a Lexus, or need one, but we we certainly deserve better than the Yugo we are saddled with today! posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 29, 2009 at 09:06 AM
posted by
donmason
on Jul 29, 2009 at 09:29 AM
"That is why one of the simplest strategies for making health insurance more affordable is to reduce the minimum number of benefits that insurers are required to cover." OK Let's begin with all Federal, State, County, and City employees. Since they already have free Lexus coverage from the taxpayer, it's the best place to begin. The tax savings would go a long way to help pay for our wonderful private health care. posted by
tkozy
on Jul 29, 2009 at 09:41 AM
Lexus coverage does not mean that the insurers are paying Lexus prices for your care. So far This year I have had a complete spinal MRI. An Angio gram, a colonoscopy and a picture taken of the inside of my bladder. Plus a number of visits to my primary doctor. I am on MediCare. Without a doubt I would have been dropped by corporate insurers years ago. posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 29, 2009 at 10:18 AM
Lexus coverage does not mean that the insurers are paying Lexus prices for your care. It means they're *DRIVING* Lexi on the profits from our premiums. posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Jul 29, 2009 at 10:42 AM
"That is why one of the simplest strategies for making health insurance more
There, fixed that for him. Funny how all of people's complaints about a possible government plan are exactly what we have to deal with now. Rationed care, high prices, paying for the uninsured, etc. posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 29, 2009 at 11:02 AM
Funny how all of people's complaints about a possible government plan are exactly what we have to deal with now. And how Jacoby's "fix" for the sitution is to let the insurance companies treat their customers *WORSE*. Now *THAT* is a true market-based solution. Wonder if he had to get prior approval from Blue Cross for the proctoscopic exam which produced that concept. posted by
krcgump
on Jul 29, 2009 at 11:09 AM
I think we need to do something just don't be in a hurry and get it right look what is happening in MA. with there state funded program posted by
tkozy
on Jul 29, 2009 at 11:47 AM
krc posted by
donmason
on Jul 29, 2009 at 01:16 PM
It's amazing how the corporate health care insurance industry fears any kind of government managed health care pool. Since they claim a government run insurance plan would be a disaster for those participating, why all the fear? The customers would come flocking back to corporate insurers in droves. I've noticed over the last few months that Blue Shield has called and sent many mailers claiming they want to "help" me with the increasing cost of health insurance, right after they raised my premiums by 30%. Amazing how "nice" they've gotten all of a sudden. posted by
Shwaine
on Jul 29, 2009 at 01:19 PM
If we're going to use the car analogy to its fullest, I think all citizens should have a nice dependable Honda Civic health care plan. Great value for their money, little depreciation and it's not going to die on you randomly as you drive down the freeway. Now, who's going to write the "If health care plans were automobiles" list? posted by
donmason
on Jul 29, 2009 at 01:27 PM
Blue Shield = Yugo Hatchback lol posted by
ALICEN
on Jul 29, 2009 at 01:35 PM
Has anybody considered the shortage of doctors there is going to be? Has anyone questioned where enough qualified doctors can be produced to meet the needs of newly-insured "millions" of people? If there are not more doctors, it is a very sad fact that a lot of people are going to be very unhappy with future health care. And, here, I'm not saying anything good or bad about public options or private options or any options at all. I'm simply asking the question about the source of sufficient numbers of doctors.
posted by
Shwaine
on Jul 29, 2009 at 02:02 PM
Shortage of doctors? Do you think all doctors' offices are going to start resembling ER waiting rooms if everyone is insured? The reason ERs are overrun has less to do with the staffing level and has more to do with capacity. There's a finite number of people they can fit into an ER at any given time. Call your doctor now and if you can get in within the week, that means he or she has got plenty of room in the schedule to fit in additional patients. And it's not as if all the suddenly insured masses would descend like locust upon the doctors offices of the land.... They'd just now have the option of calling for an appointment when they got ill or injured instead of filling up the ER, which would actually free up the ER for its intended purpose: to treat those urgently ill or injured. posted by
tkozy
on Jul 29, 2009 at 02:02 PM
Ali, posted by
NancyII
on Jul 29, 2009 at 02:32 PM
posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Jul 29, 2009 at 02:35 PM
posted by
jfrancais
on Jul 29, 2009 at 02:40 PM
If there are not enough doctors there just aren’t enough doctors. No matter who or how the health care is provided. Did you know that there are such a surplus of doctors in Cuba that they send them around the world to provide health care to impoverished nations and during humanitarian crises? Even American doctors have been trained in Cuba's medical program. posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 29, 2009 at 02:46 PM
Did you know that there are such a surplus of doctors in Cuba that they send them around the world to provide health care to impoverished nations and during humanitarian crises? Cuba ranks right alongside the US in medical measurements--except cost, of course. Nobody surpasses the US in the cost of care. If there are too few doctors, doesn't it make sense to allocate them to the sickest patients instead of the richest? posted by
jfrancais
on Jul 29, 2009 at 02:53 PM
RF, I don't know what's more remarkable: How the US does so little with so much or how Cuba does so much with so little. posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Jul 29, 2009 at 02:54 PM
"If there are too few doctors, doesn't it make sense to allocate them to the sickest patients instead of the richest?" Not to the for-profit insurance industry it doesn't. posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 29, 2009 at 02:57 PM
Maybe Jacoby just has a gas leak. From both ends. . Nancy, this is about the most inane column I've *EVER* seen from Jacoby. His list (at insure.com, an unbiased source I'm sure) is presented in alphabetical order, but I'll bet "emergency services" is at the top in state mandates. Why would anyone allow insurers to drop that? Is he insinuating that mandatory minimum maternity stays in *ANY* way compares to a GPS system in a Lexus? Mammograms are a luxury? The whole *CONCEPT* of insurance is that lots of people pay (partially) for services they actually *HOPE* they will never use. That's *WHY* things are mandated. Without such rules, insurers would skip out on stuff that only a few might use--but that would save those peoples' lives. Whatever Jacoby's on, it ain't the generic stuff--it's brand-name potent.
posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 29, 2009 at 02:59 PM
how Cuba does so much with so little. Government planning. They've got us beat in emergency preparedness too. In WWII Britain had horrendous food shortages. With rational scientific planning they raised an extremely healthy generation of kids--and came out of it with national health care too. posted by
jfrancais
on Jul 29, 2009 at 03:08 PM
They've got us beat in emergency preparedness too. They've lived under emergency for almost 50 years now. posted by
ronmexico
on Jul 29, 2009 at 03:12 PM
So many medical advances have come out of Cuba in the last 50 years. We should all aspire to live in such a paradise... posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 29, 2009 at 03:12 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 29, 2009 at 03:16 PM
posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Jul 29, 2009 at 03:17 PM
Well, among other things, Cuba has one of the highest life expectancy rates in the world. Here's some more posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Jul 29, 2009 at 03:18 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 29, 2009 at 03:20 PM
I had one of my minions do it for me. Please note that's a BBC piece and actually mentions some of the downside as well. posted by
jfrancais
on Jul 29, 2009 at 03:22 PM
For whatever it's worth, here's a little bit about advances over the past 10 years or so... http://www.cubanet.org/CNew... http://www.cubaplus.ca/heal... http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-b... http://www.politicalaffairs... http://www.workers.org/2009... posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Jul 29, 2009 at 03:22 PM
I think it's extremely important to see the downsides of the more successful healthcare programs in various countries. Then we can take the best ideas and scrap what doesn't work. That's the American Way!!! posted by
bakoblue
on Jul 29, 2009 at 03:25 PM
If the insurance companies are so worried about losing subscribers, perhaps they ought to open up coverage to those who desperately want it, and can afford it, but are being rejected by them every single day. posted by
jfrancais
on Jul 29, 2009 at 03:27 PM
There are downsides to every system. We have to ask ourselves what's important. We could really fix the health care problem if we had the will but there is fear over putting the private option out of business.
I don't have a problem with that if people are able to access adequte health care. The profits should be merely a byproduct and not the "bottom line". posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 29, 2009 at 03:55 PM
If the insurance companies are so worried about losing subscribers, You misspelled "obscene profits." posted by
donmason
on Jul 29, 2009 at 05:05 PM
"how Cuba does so much with so little.
Government planning. They've got us beat in emergency preparedness too." They can also keep a 1952 Chevy going for over 55 years, and looking good too. posted by
tkozy
on Jul 29, 2009 at 05:07 PM
If only we could find a cure for : posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 29, 2009 at 05:16 PM
You don't understand the horror, tkozy. They're going to *FORCE* us to have options. Spam code MD AUK. Hope they're not equivalently extinct. posted by
tkozy
on Jul 29, 2009 at 05:20 PM
Random, You mean options like: 1. Continuing to hold your breath while under water. 2. Coming up to breathe. posted by
ALICEN
on Jul 29, 2009 at 05:51 PM
Pardon me all to hades for saying anything about a possible doctor shortage. Forgive my audacity in bringing up the possibility of a doctor shortage. How can anyone forgive such STUPID comments? I'm ALWAYS commenting so STUPIDLY! (I'm so glad someone used that word recently. I never would have used it if the most IMPORTANT PERSON IN THE WORLD hadn't used it. It shows such maturity and grasp of communication skills. STUPIDLY. STUPIDLY. Such sophistication. UNBELIEVABLE!) You guys can probably call up your doctor right now and get a regular appointment in about a month or so -- or much earlier in the event of something possibly serious. When the rolls begin filling up with all these millions of people who are uninsured, surely they will not go to the ER but will do the sensible thing, which is make an appointment with a doctor. Who knows? It may even be YOUR doctor. That means that when you call YOUR doctor for an appointment, you possibly won't get to see him for six to eight weeks. If you're lucky. Later on, it's likely to be eight to ten weeks, and so on. If you need a test, it may be pushed back four to six weeks. But that's okay, right? You all are willing to share your doctor, right? The doctor who has always given you the impression there's not another patient in the world but YOU? Foget about it. You'll be lucky if he comes in and asks if you need another prescription for something. Does this "waiting" business sound familiar? Maybe like Canada? England? You like it? Go for it. That is, go for England. Go for Canada. You'd like it much better there now anyway. They already have waiting lines. You won't have to WAIT for a waiting line. It'll already have been created for you. There. Doesn't that make you feel better?
posted by
tkozy
on Jul 29, 2009 at 05:59 PM
Ali, posted by
ALICEN
on Jul 29, 2009 at 06:08 PM
posted by
jfrancais
on Jul 29, 2009 at 06:09 PM
Alicen, are you saying that we should not offer health care to all because the people that currently have it will have a longer wait for regular health services? Or are you saying that the current health care system can baely support the needs of the American people now(i.e. shortage of health professionals)? I don't understand.
posted by
ALICEN
on Jul 29, 2009 at 06:24 PM
jf: If you will read my original comment, you would see that I am simply commenting on the fact that there will be a shortage of doctors when everybody signs up. Nowhere -- nowhere -- have I said that people were not entitled to receive health care. I am simply saying there will be a SHORTAGE OF DOCTORS. And I wonder if anybody had thought that far ahead. By "anybody" I mean our revered Congress and administration. We can't just manufacture doctors out of thin air. When there are doctor shortages, the quallify of health care will be diminished. A precedes B. That's all. posted by
tkozy
on Jul 29, 2009 at 06:41 PM
Ali, How do you come to the conclusion that there will be a shortage of Dr's.? For every case that you point to in other plans in other countries. I will find 10 posts that totally support their single payer plans. The health care systems have been studied to death. America ranks very poorly in cost. In fact the worst. And using modern day comparisons the U.S. does not provided better care.
According to the U.N life expectancy report. The U.S. lands in 38th place just behind Cuba. Japan is #1 at 82.5 years http://www.slideshare.net/t... .
posted by
ALICEN
on Jul 29, 2009 at 06:43 PM
Nancy, I have another question. If Cuba is so grand, why don't a lot of these commenters pack a bag, get on a boat, and see if they can sneak into the country. In addition to that, why is it that Cubans risk life and limb to reach Florida's shores, with just ONE FOOT on land? WHY? Will somebody tell me why it is that if Cuba is so wonderful, people are risking their lives to leave? And come HERE, of all places. Where everybody knows the health care is so poor. posted by
ALICEN
on Jul 29, 2009 at 06:47 PM
posted by
Shwaine
on Jul 29, 2009 at 06:51 PM
I can call up my doctor and get an appointment in 1-2 days or the same day for illness or minor injuries. About the only time I can't is if my doctor has gone on vacation, and then I'm given the option of waiting until she returns or seeing someone else in the medical group. And I know I'm not alone in this. This fear of having to wait months to see a doctor is rather unfounded, but commonly mentioned among certain political entertainers. posted by
ALICEN
on Jul 29, 2009 at 06:52 PM
posted by
tkozy
on Jul 29, 2009 at 06:53 PM
Ali, Will you tell me why anybody would think that Florida's little Cuba is anything but a slum. A great deal of criminality in Little Cuba. You know what they say. Birds of the same feather, flock together. Cuba has manged to rid itself of a great deal of trouble makers. And save their superior heath care for their good guys.
Advertisement |