Neverleft's Things to Think About

A blog about Technology.
About Neverleft


Real Name:
Bryan Kelly
Gender:
male
Date of Birth:
January 03, 1955
Member Since:
June 14, 2007
Last Signed In:
November 21, 2009
Profile Views:
690
Blog Views:
6083
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
The Pocket Taser.
Soros, The bitter truth!
The "islam" problem
Not PC but funny.
Immigration Bill From CNN
National Debt Clock
Pelosi's "Worst legislation ever"
Swine Flu. Everybody Should Read This!
Too Old For Trick or Treat?
I'll Take My Ball and Go Home!
Archives
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


Neverleft - > Neverleft's Things to Think About -> New #1 on Oscama's "Enemy List".
New #1 on Oscama's "Enemy List".

THE CONSERVATIVE REVIEW – October 20, 2009

Alienated & Radicalized
by Pat Buchanan

In the brief age of Obama, we have had “truthers,”
“birthers,” Tea Party activists and town-hall dissenters.

Comes now, the “Oath Keepers.” And who might they be?

Writes Alan Maimon in the Las Vegas Review-Journal, Oath
Keepers, depending on where one stands, are “either
strident defenders of liberty or dangerous peddlers of
paranoia.”

Formed in March, they are ex-military and police who
repledge themselves to defend the Constitution, even if
it means disobeying orders. If the U.S. government ordered
law enforcement agencies to violate Second Amendment rights
by disarming the people, Oath Keepers will not obey.

“The whole point of Oath Keepers is to stop a dictatorship
from ever happening here,” says founding father Stewart
Rhodes, an ex-Army paratrooper and Yale-trained lawyer.
“My focus is on the guys with the guns, because they can’t
do it without them.

“We say if the American people decide it’s time for a
revolution, we’ll fight with you.”

Prediction: Brother Rhodes is headed for cable stardom.

And if the Pelosi-Reid progressives went postal over town-
hall protesters, calling them “un-American,” “Nazis” and
“evil-mongers,” one can imagine what they will do with the
Oath Keepers.

As with Jimmy Carter’s long range psychoanalysis of Joe
Wilson, the reflexive reaction of the mainstream media
will likely be that these are militia types, driven to
irrationality because America has a black president.

Yet, the establishment’s reaction seems more problematic
for the republic than anything the Oath Keepers are up
to. For our political and media elite seem to have lost
touch with the nation and to be wedded to a vision of
America divorced from reality.

Progressives are the folks who, in the 1960s, could easily
understand that urban riots that took scores of lives and
destroyed billions in property were an inevitable reaction
to racism, poverty and despair. They could empathize with
the rage of campus radicals who burned down the ROTC build-
ing and bombed the Pentagon.

The “dirty, immoral war in Vietnam” explains why the
“finest generation we have ever produced” is behaving
like this, they said. We must deal with the “root causes”
of social disorder.

Yet, they cannot comprehend what would motivate Middle
America to distrust its government, for it surely does,
as Ron Brownstein reports in the National Journal:

“Whites are not only more anxious, but also more alienated.
Big majorities of whites say the past year’s turmoil has
diminished their confidence in government, corporations
and the financial industry… Asked which institution they
trust most to make economic decisions in their interest,
a plurality of whites older than 30 pick ‘none’ — a grim
statement.”

Is all this due to Obama’s race?

Even Obama laughs at that. As he told David Letterman, I
was already black by the time I was elected. And he not
only got a higher share of the white vote than Kerry or
Gore, a third of white voters, who said in August 2008
that race was an important consideration in voting, said
they were going to vote for Obama.

With black voters going 24 to 1 for Obama, he almost
surely won more votes than he lost because of his race.

Moreover, the alienation and radicalization of white
America began long before Obama arrived. He acknowledged
as much when he explained Middle Pennsylvanians to puzzled
progressives in that closed-door meeting in San Francisco.

Referring to the white working-class voters in the
industrial towns decimated by job losses, Obama said:
“They get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or
antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant
sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain
their frustrations.”

Yet, we had seen these folks before. They were Perotistas
in 1992, opposed NAFTA in 1993, and blocked the Bush-
Kennedy McCain amnesty in 2007.

In their lifetimes, they have seen their Christian faith
purged from schools their taxes paid for, and mocked in
movies and on TV. They have seen their factories shuttered
in the thousands and their jobs outsourced in the millions
to Mexico and China. They have seen trillions of tax
dollars go for Great Society programs, but have seen no
Great Society, only rising crime, illegitimacy, drug use
and dropout rates.

They watch on cable TV as illegal aliens walk into their
country, are rewarded with free educations and health care,
and take jobs at lower pay than American families can live
on — then carry Mexican flags in American cities and
demand U.S. citizenship.

They see Wall Street banks bailed out as they sweat their
next paycheck, then read that bank profits are soaring,
and the big bonuses for the brilliant bankers are back.
Neither they nor their kids ever benefited from affirmative
action, unlike Barack and Michelle Obama.

They see a government in Washington that cannot balance its
books, win our wars or protect our borders. The government
shovels out trillions to Fortune 500 corporations and banks
to rescue the country from a crisis created by the govern-
ment and Fortune 500 corporations and banks.

America was once their country. They sense they are losing
it  and they are right.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by Neverleft on Tuesday, October 20, 2009 at 02:11 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 103 times
22 comments from 10 users

1

posted by djembe on Oct 20, 2009 at 02:33 PM

Where were these people 8 1/2 years ago when Bush and Cheney were chipping away at the Constitution?


posted by catpaw on Oct 20, 2009 at 02:42 PM

Blame it on Bush. I do.

posted by samheath on Oct 20, 2009 at 02:49 PM

No one was harsher on "Caesar Bush" than I was during his "reign." And he certainly deserves credit for Obama, especially since the best the GOP could do was McCain. But I continue to hold the position that the seed of America's destruction was sown in slavery. I believe Franklin  understood this "flaw" in the Constitution.

posted by catpaw on Oct 20, 2009 at 03:16 PM

Can't recall the exact words off hand, but didn't Jefferson respond to slavery with, "When I think we have a just god, I tremble for my country."

posted by paxchristi3 on Oct 20, 2009 at 03:55 PM

The Oath Keepers can count on me taking up arms and joining them if a dictatorship does emerge in this nation. And to think it didn't have to get to this point if the folks only had voted for McCain/Palin instead. I mean, McCain wasn't anywhere near the ideal candidate for the conservatives, but he was as liberal enough as we could stomach to keep the voters from going loco with this radical administration.

posted by catpaw on Oct 20, 2009 at 04:05 PM

Nor did McCain have anywhere near the ideal picking skills for a running mate. That Palin might step in for a president with poor health, one foot in the grave and the other on a bananna peel was a scary prospect. Palin would have destroyed the country. No matter how remote the possibility McCain would croak in office, that fanatical woman in the Oval Office would have been a disaster. 

posted by Neverleft on Oct 20, 2009 at 04:52 PM

You don't think Biden or Polosi in the oval orfice would be a disaster? come on now!

posted by paxchristi3 on Oct 20, 2009 at 04:54 PM
posted by Neverleft on Oct 20, 2009 at 04:54 PM

Yep! just keep blaming it on Bush. The American people are no longer buying that. The honeymoon is OVER.

posted by dragoon on Oct 20, 2009 at 05:26 PM

Walton's Corollary to Godwin's Law: In any discussion relative to President Obama's incompetence, eventually former President Bush will be blamed.

Kern Shooting Sports monthly meeting tonight.

Dragoon out.

posted by siouxcityranch on Oct 20, 2009 at 05:43 PM

heck dragoon they will keep blaming Bush until we get the power back next election..when the grownups get to  vote again..they dont stand a chance now that ACORNS cover has been blown

posted by ALICEN on Oct 20, 2009 at 06:49 PM

Neverleft:  Bush will be blamed when (if) Cap and Trade is passed and people get zapped for everything they consume, anything and everything that can be purchased or supplied.  Bush will be blamed for a health care melt-down when it occurs.  Bush will be blamed for cooler temperatures.  Bush will be blamed for Hurricane Rick, after the fact.  If it goes bad, Bush will be blamed.  We know that.  We know we have a president who will never take responsibility for his own actions.  Not unless there is ever a happy outcome.  I'm waiting for that.

posted by dragoon on Oct 21, 2009 at 12:55 AM

Sioux, now that's hope and change that I can believe in.

 

posted by samheath on Oct 21, 2009 at 07:18 AM

To all my fellow believers in the Second Amendment here is my take on what the Founding Fathers intended: "Keep your powder dry." I also expressed my hope at length, though faint one, that Sarah Heath-Palin would indeed become President.

posted by randomfactor on Oct 21, 2009 at 07:35 AM

Obama *DOES* believe in the Second Amendment. 

In fact, I believe he's advised all his black friends to buy guns.  So you don't have to worry.

posted by VirgilAnderson on Oct 21, 2009 at 09:36 AM

 

 

"Sarah Heath-Palin would indeed become President."

 

I hope she runs, too !

--virgil

posted by VirgilAnderson on Oct 21, 2009 at 09:39 AM

 

Yes, indeed ... I sure do .

--virgil

posted by VirgilAnderson on Oct 21, 2009 at 09:49 AM

 

 

mmm ...

--virgil

posted by ALICEN on Oct 21, 2009 at 12:51 PM

Virgil, if that picture happened to be one of your wife, would you have pasted it there?  Your mother?  Your sister?  Your daughters, when they're a little older?  Would it ever occur to you that it may not be in good taste to put it up there?  Just wondering.

posted by VirgilAnderson on Oct 21, 2009 at 01:03 PM

 

But, Alicen ... It's Sarah Palin .

Pretty good, huh ?  I'd vote for her ...

--virgil

posted by VirgilAnderson on Oct 21, 2009 at 01:05 PM

 

I wonder what she's reading ?

--virgil

posted by ALICEN on Oct 21, 2009 at 01:25 PM

Maybe she's looking for the copyright notice on that picture of "herself."

 

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement