Culture warrior
Culture wars

A blog about Religion & Faith, Politics, and News.
About Ppopgun


Member Since:
November 01, 2008
Last Signed In:
September 03, 2009
Profile Views:
103
Blog Views:
2133
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Campaign cash used to defend presidency eligibility suits?
Let there be Orly (Hebrew for "light") on Obama's eligibility
Yo', man ... where da party at?
Eligibility lawyer: President should be deported
Soldier questions president's eligibility
It's one thing for a schmoe like me to call out ...
"It's a double standard from bizarro world"
North Dakota House bans abortion
Soetoro/Obama a despot?
"We're not a monarchy"
Archives
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


Ppopgun - > Culture warrior -> "We're not a monarchy"
"We're not a monarchy"

I sure remember the Senate voting unanimously in a resolution saying that it had no issue with McCain's eligibility to run for president, not that it officially resolved the constitutional matter as it didn't stop one lawyer from challenging his eligibility as well as Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama's and a third minor candidate's.

Too bad it couldn't have done the same for Soetoro/Obama to at least partially dissipate that ominous cloud hanging over his head. While that's the fault of Soetoro/Obama, it's still nice to see a lawsuit to put Congress on the hook for not doing its duty to protect the Constitution by ensuring that Soetoro/Obama isn't actually an illegal immigrant (don't forget that one of his picks for a Cabinet post, Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, once made a slip during a TV interview by calling Soetoro/Obama an "immigrant.")

Anyway, do read on for the latest ...

Eligibility issue: McCain checked but not Obama
Lawsuit contends Congress failed to qualify Democrat for Oval Office


Posted: February 10, 2009
9:09 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

 

A lawsuit that accuses Congress of failing to investigate President Obama's birthplace before approving the Electoral College vote giving him the presidency has been amended to include additional claims of rights violations, including unequal treatment, because Congress did such an investigation into GOP candidate Sen. John McCain.

That word comes from Mario Apuzzo, the lawyer handling the case on which WND previously has reported.

The case raises many of the same arguments as dozens of other cases that have flooded into courtrooms around the nation since the November election.

The case was brought by Apuzzo on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr. It names as defendants Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives and former Vice President Dick Cheney along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Apuzzo told WND that Congress last year raised the issue of whether McCain was a "natural born" citizen, a requirement set out in the U.S. Constitution for the president, because of his birth to U.S. citizens in the Panama Canal Zone.

Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 235,000 others and sign up now!

According to a report in the Washington Post, the Senate unanimously declared McCain to be a "natural born" citizen, meeting the demand of Article 2 of the Constitution, which states, "no person except a natural born citizen … shall be eligible to the office of president."

The report, however, pointed out that such a statement was opinion only, and the constitutional question actually isn't so simple. It quoted Catholic University associate law professor Sarah Duggin saying the document is ambiguous.

"Ultimately there has never been any real resolution of this issue. Congress cannot legislatively change the meaning of the Constitution," she told the newspaper, saying a constitutional amendment or a U.S. Supreme Court ruling would be the way to reach a determination.

However, even though his clients wrote to Congress requesting a similar review of Obama's birthplace, they were refused.

"The question is: Why do you do it for McCain, but not Obama," Apuzzo told WND (I wish I knew myself).

More specifically, those who doubted McCain's eligibility had an opportunity for a review but not those who doubt Obama (and HE wants to implement the Fairness Doctrine? Chee ... ).

That violates a liberty right for his clients, he said, because as members of a republic, they have a right to know that their president is legitimate (you betcha).

"What I'm arguing is that Congress and President Obama have violated my clients' due process under Article 5 [of the U.S. Constitution]," Apuzzo said.

Already; Congress held a responsibility to make certain Obama is qualified for the post, he alleges. And the public outcry, evidenced by the dozens of lawsuits over the issue, should have prompted due diligence on the part of members of Congress (tsk, tsk), he said.

Obama, meanwhile, has refused to hand over "sufficient documents" to verify his "natural born" status (why?), Apuzzo said.

"We're not a monarchy," Apuzzo said, "People have a right to know."

He said his case in U.S. District Court in New Jersey is at the point where the court notices about the case are being distributed.

He said the fact Obama already has been inaugurated changes nothing in his case (I should say so).

"Before that, everything really was premature," he said. "He has a right to run for office. But when you down to the nitty gritty, he still has to qualify for the position. (of course)"

He said the Constitution specifically raises the scenario of a president who has been chosen for office but has failed to qualify.

"Even though you ran, everybody loves you, you still have got to qualify under the Constitution," (ditto on behalf of those who hate a fraud) Apuzzo said.

Further, the lawsuit explains, not only are there legitimate questions about Obama's birth, and therefore eligibility, he might not even be a U.S. citizen at all.

"There exists a possibility that Obama could be an illegal alien," (oooooh, how does London, Jakarta or Mombasa suit Mrs. Obama?) the lawsuit said. "Obama has yet to adequately prove that he was born in the United States. [Further], Obama has publicly conceded that his father was born in Kenya and a British subject/citizen at the time of Obama's birth which precluded Obama from gaining any U.S. citizenship from his father."

The lawsuits over Obama's eligibility, in various ways, have alleged Obama does not meet the "natural born citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, which reads, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the legal challenges have alleged Obama was not born in Hawaii, as he insists, but in Kenya. Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time (thank God at least she didn't confer abortion on him).

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Several details of Obama's past have added twists to the question of his eligibility and citizenship, including his family's move to Indonesia when he was a child and on what nation's passport he traveled to Pakistan in the '80s, as well as conflicting reports from Obama's family about his place of birth.

Apuzzo told WND the biggest reason to investigate further is the fact that Obama has refused to allow public release of a signed "vault" copy of his original birth certificate (it costs only $12.50 to do that, but he decides to spend nearly a million bucks to have three law firms keep that and other documents under wraps? Something's rotten in Denmark).

Several of the legal cases – including those brought by Orly Taitz, Cort Wrotnowski, Leo Donofrio and Philip Berg, already have been discussed in conference at the U.S. Supreme Court, which has failed to have a hearing on any of the merits involved (guess we may never know now, won't we?).

Taitz, in fact, is requesting information from the Supreme Court about a meeting eight of its justices held with Obama (now what was that all about?), a defendant in her case, before the justices reviewed the issues of the case in a private conference.

Several of the cases still remain active at lower court levels, from which emergency requests to the high court were launched.

"I know that Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally qualified natural born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of president of the United States," Berg said in a statement on his ObamaCrimes.com website.

"Obama knows he is not 'natural born' as he knows where he was born and he knows he was adopted in Indonesia; Obama is an attorney, Harvard Law grad who taught Constitutional law; Obama knows his candidacy is the largest 'hoax' attempted on the citizens of the United States in over 200 years (attention, mainstream media, don't you smell Pulitzer Prize?); Obama places our Constitution in a 'crisis' situation; and Obama is in a situation where he can be blackmailed by leaders around the world who know Obama is not qualified," (perhaps referring to Vladimir Putin? See: http://www.wnd.com/index.ph... Berg's statement continued.

Posted in the Politics interest group.
Topics:
posted by Ppopgun on Tuesday, February 10, 2009 at 11:05 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 51 times
3 comments from 3 users

1

posted by Btowntv007 on Feb 11, 2009 at 08:05 AM

Ah christ.  Give it up and get a life.

posted by catpaw on Feb 11, 2009 at 09:33 AM

Reading this article has just taken about 5 minutes of my life I'll never get back. Bob Unruh owes me.

posted by Ppopgun on Feb 11, 2009 at 11:19 AM

Likewise, Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama owes me big time for all the trouble and anxiety he has caused me when he could've simply turned over his birth certificate (the valid long form one kept hidden in the vault, not the "garbage" his minions have posted on the Internet) to make this all go away. Would someone care to explain to me what he has to hide? I do not trust anyone who pulls off a stunt like this and thinks we'd just ignore it. Just wait ... the truth will surface one way or another. And then you will owe me a big fat apology, right?


1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement