The Dirt
Polluted air, scarce water, dumping, sprawl. In The Dirt, reporter Stacey Shepard examines the numerous environmental problems facing Bakersfield and Kern County.

A blog about Business & Finance and Family & Home.
About TheDirt


Member Since:
January 22, 2008
Last Signed In:
October 10, 2008
Profile Views:
567
Blog Views:
6432
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
High-speed rail: Thumbs up or down?
Sex, Drugs and Oil: bureaucrats gone wild
Senate sludge meeting abruptly canceled
High-speed rail: will you vote for it?
Tell your sludge story
Public workshops on Big West expansion
Who uses Amtrak?
Olympic venues and sustainability
Could you buy nothing new for a month? A year?
Move over monster trucks, smart car has arrived
Archives
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


TheDirt - > The Dirt -> Tejon Ranch's historic deal: a win-win?
Tejon Ranch's historic deal: a win-win?

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger praised today's Tejon Ranch announcement as an example of how developers and environmentalists can come together and find solutions.

"When forward-thinking people, like the people that are standing here with me today, are willing to sit down and make something positive happen ... all battle lines can be terminated," Schwarzenegger said.


(Get it? Terminated. Ha ha.)

But everything is not so rosy.

The confidential meetings that resulted in the deal between Tejon Ranch and Sierra Club and other environmental groups has caused a split among the local Sierra Club members. The dissenters are upset that they -- some of whom live nearby and could  feel the impacts of Tejon's proposed developments --  weren't consulted on the secret meetings.


Others say the preservation deal isn't as great as it sounds. Most of the land being preserved was too rugged to be developed, anyway, and now someone has to pay for 60,000 acres of it.

Still, agreeing not to develop 90 percent of its land sounds like a pretty big concession on Tejon's part.

What do you think: was  this a win-win or a lopsided deal?

Posted in these Groups:
Topics: environment
posted by TheDirt on Thursday, May 8, 2008 at 06:27 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 80 times
4 comments from 4 users

1

posted by AudreyB on May 9, 2008 at 08:03 AM

I hope they have a house in my price range!

posted by witbee on May 9, 2008 at 08:00 AM

You're not going to please everybody. Especially if it is in their backyard.

posted by catpaw on May 9, 2008 at 07:32 AM

Leaving all that acreage in its natural state sounds better than letting some developers decide what should be done with it.

posted by drilnliftcrude on May 8, 2008 at 07:32 PM

The Sierra Club sold its soul a long time ago when it chose not to speak out on the environmental impact of unchecked immigration.  It is more interested in lining its pockets than doing the right thing concerning the environment.  The Sudetenland analogy nails it.

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: