The Dirt
Polluted air, scarce water, dumping, sprawl. In The Dirt, The Californian examines the numerous environmental problems facing Bakersfield and Kern County.

A blog about Family & Home and Business & Finance.
About TheDirt


Member Since:
January 22, 2008
Last Signed In:
April 23, 2009
Profile Views:
734
Blog Views:
10320
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Carbon sequestration seminar at CSUB Wednesday
Major dairy rule to be temporarily lifted
How are local businesses going green?
Two condors shot recently on Central Coast
Get a free smog test at BC Saturday
Organic food: Is it worth it?
Save on energy-saving computer accessories
Some areas of Kern ablaze with wildflowers
Duraflame sues over fireplace rule in Bay Area
Have you ever wondered, why don't we do that here?
Archives
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


TheDirt - > The Dirt -> Properly placed trees cut home utility costs
Properly placed trees cut home utility costs

Planning to plant trees near your home in the near future? If so, make sure they go on the west or south side of your house, according to this new study by the Pacific Northwest Research Station of USDA Forest Service.

Doing so could bring down your summertime electrical costs by an average of $25 a  year.

Here's the full press release:

PORTLAND, Ore. January 5,  2009.  A recent study shows that shade trees on the west and south sides of a house in California can reduce a homeowner’s summertime electric bill by about $25.00 a year. The study, conducted last year on 460 single-family homes in Sacramento, is the first large-scale study to use utility billing data to show that trees can reduce energy consumption.
        “Everyone knows that shade trees cool a house. No one is going to get a Nobel Prize for that conclusion,” says the study co-author, Geoffrey Donovan. “But this study gets at the details: Where should a tree be placed to get the most benefits? And how exactly do shade trees impact our carbon footprint?”
         Donovan, a research forester with the Forest Service’s Pacific Northwest (PNW) Research Station, is a co-author of the report with economist David Butry of the National Institutes of Standards and Technology. The report, “The Value of Shade: Estimating the Effect of Urban Trees on Summertime Electricity Use,” has been submitted for publication to the journal Energy and Buildings.
        The researchers chose to do their study on homes in Sacramento because of the city’s hot summers and the fact that most people use air conditioners. The Sacramento Municipal Utility District operates an active tree planting program and residents are eligible for up to 10 free trees annually through a program delivered in partnership with the Sacramento Tree Foundation.

Some of the study’s key findings are:

Placement of a tree is the key to energy savings. Shade trees do affect summertime electricity use, but the amount of the savings depends on the location of the tree.

Trees planted within 40 feet of the south side or within 60 feet of the west side of the house will generate about the same amount of energy savings. This is because of the way shadows fall at different times of the day.

Tree cover on the east side of a house has no effect on electricity use.

A tree planted on the west side of a house can reduce net carbon emissions from summertime electricity use by 30 percent over a 100-year period.

In 2007, the Sacramento Municipal Utility District gave its customers about 16,000 free trees (at a cost of $85.00 a tree). The district will recoup this investment in 26 years provided trees are planted on the west side of a house.

“Because homeowners experience virtually none of the carbon benefits of tree planting,” says Donovan, “a subsidy to encourage tree planting seems warranted. Indeed, many of the benefits of urban trees have been shown to spill over to others in the community.”
 

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by TheDirt on Monday, January 5, 2009 at 12:42 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 74 times
2 comments from 1 users

1

posted by Shwaine on Jan 5, 2009 at 08:20 PM

I just had to take out a couple of west-side birch trees that had died or were dying. Not that they provided much shade, but I have to wonder how much of an effect it will have come summer. There's several issues with that area of the yard that need to be addressed before I can consider a new tree and I just don't have the money for it right now. If I planted without addressing the issues, the new tree would be prone to problems just like the birches were.

posted by Shwaine on Jan 22, 2009 at 01:36 AM

I'll just sweat it out if the AC seems to be toiling more this summer. I just noticed the neighbors have mistletoe in their trees, so another item to add to the list of things to consider before replanting.

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement