|
Underwater Cities- Bakersfield at Number 12 in the Nation Water: Bako is Conservative But Cannot Conserve I Love Sam Cooke Time Out, Toddlers! Karl Rove & Why Americans Continue to Lose Where the money goes in the health care scheme of things Steve Dalkowski -Ron Shelton's Take on a Bako legend It costs how much for Development League Basketball? The morning paper Sicko- The campaign to keep America from health care reform June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Back To School
I saw a number of stories on the percentage of California's high school graduates going to college after their 12th year graduation. Here is a link to channel 29's story here locally, that aired a night or two ago. Jose Gaspar gets the credit. No surprise Kern County falls below the state average in this regard at about 44% moving on to a college while the state average is at 48%. Kern County is close to the average, but the average is startlingly low. Actually, having only 48% of our state's kids go on to college from the 2003 to 2007 high school graduating classes is terrible. I saw this story originally in the Sacramento Bee a few days ago. If you want to check out how your local school, anywhere in California, is doing on this score, or how counties and their schools fare, here is the link to a cool database the Bee has linked to to give you all the information. We have a story in today's paper concerning the lack of a skilled and educated workforce being seen as the major obstacle facing local employers. Here is the story if you missed it. Bakersfield Junior College is back in session. I live near the college and can attest to a lot more traffic this week as a result. Much of the time the swell of students occurs for the first month and then gradually subsides to modest traffic in a mopnth's time. We'll see this year. B.C. announced they have nearly 17,000 students enrolled for this semester. As an old geezer these days, I have over the last few years taken a class or two offered by the junior college. I talk to people who also have attempted to retrain or get those necessary courses done to complete either a certification or program choice. The word on the street is that it is really difficult to score required courses at times people need them offered. In my humble opinion B.C. is tapped out on a resource level. Given Kern County's close to 12% unemployment rate and low median income average for the county residents CSUB (at a modest price) is out of reach for a lot of local students and adults. I think we need to expand Bakersfield Junior College and create another campus, probably somewhere in the south area of town that could use an economic boost. Maybe all this news is just the same-old same-old, and requires no consideration or action. Maybe all this news is another alarm bell going off that our priorities are really screwed up. Really, do we want to continue to keep building prisons for thrown away youth? Or couldn't we try to invest in schools where needed skills can be obtained at costs our population can afford?
27 comments from 14 users
1
posted by
witbee
on Jan 23, 2009 at 12:59 PM
I take a different angle. I don't think every kid is college material. Having about half begin college right after high school (not necessarily finish) is probably about right. Many students want to "bum around" for a year or are just too burnt out to go. Some will enter technical programs later on. But why do we have this fascination with every kid going to college? College is not the end-all, be-all of existence. You can be an intelligent, well-read, contributing member of society without ever having to take a college class. In fact, a great deal of my education, especially the general education courses they make you take, were a complete waste of time and money. My real education didn't start until I enetered the work force. Well, maybe graduate school, but I was in the work force then, as well. posted by
jfrancais
on Jan 23, 2009 at 01:08 PM
Life has been the best education for me. I've learned more outside of the classroom than in it. I just got to a point where I saw that I needed the paper (diplomas, degrees) to have a better quality of life. College was basically a place where I got credit for things that life taught me and it allowed me to focus my academic interests (foreign languages, foreign countries, and international politics). posted by
mrsearnhardt88
on Jan 23, 2009 at 01:34 PM
As an old geezer these days, I have over the last few years taken a class or two offered by the junior college. I talk to people who also have attempted to retrain or get those necessary courses done to complete either a certification or program choice. The word on the street is that it is really difficult to score required courses at times people need them offered. In my humble opinion B.C. is tapped out on a resource level.
Let me give you some updated information. BC is at the mercy of the State when it comes to funding. I don't need to elaborate on the obvious issue there. It's great that you have taken some classes in your "Geezer" years! FYI- BC now has the Levan Institute for Lifelong Learning with several class options you might like. The Institute is intended for "55 and better" but the classes are open to anyone. No credits involved, but a great way to learn some new stuff. You can get all the info on the BC website. As far as issues getting into required courses, there are classes available at night at the Main Campus as well as night classes offered at Stockdale High in the southwest. Several courses can be taken online as well. BC also has the Delano Campus. Another independent campus is planned for the Northwest part of town in the near future too. I think we need to expand Bakersfield Junior College and create another campus, probably somewhere in the south area of town that could use an economic boost.
In addition to the Main Campus, Delano, Stockdale High and the northwest campus, a new campus will be popping up south of town too in the near future.
BC is affected by the economy just like all the rest of us. There is a huge increase in the enrollment at the moment, which is a clear reflection of what is happening with the economy. BC does not turn away any students, but they may not be able to get the classes they want right away. As far as being tapped out on resources, the college's funding for enrollment is projected years ahead of the actual school year it is intended for. Unemployment goes up, tons of students are enrolling, but BC doesn't get any extra funding to cover the cost of the additional students.
We have a story in today's paper concerning the lack of a skilled and educated workforce being seen as the major obstacle facing local employers.
The focus for BC right now is to fully train potential employees so they can get out into the workforce and know what they are doing. A lot of local companies recruit BC students long before they graduate, and train them to fit into their business right from the start. After all, great eduation = great employees!
posted by
ALICEN
on Jan 23, 2009 at 01:37 PM
Here's my angle: higher education teaches many how to learn. Receptive minds are fleeting. Wait -- that's two angles, isn't it? posted by
dirtyshirt
on Jan 23, 2009 at 01:46 PM
Bakersfield and Kern County has to get past it's ambivalence to education generally and college education specifically. Pushing education as a worthwhile goal for youngsters is not to say that you're self-educated/university-of-life/street-wise/comm on-sense-guided life is wasted. Feel good about your successes in life, but please don't suggest that good public policy includes diminishing higher education for the community. CSUB is good for the community. BC is good for the community. High schools should be pushing kids towards both. posted by
TSM
on Jan 23, 2009 at 01:56 PM
Bakersfield and Kern County has to get past it's ambivalence to education generally and college education specifically It would help to have a school board who put their efforts into improving the student's educational needs and not their own personal religious agendas.
posted by
learnem
on Jan 23, 2009 at 02:20 PM
kids get as good of an education as their parents will let them. NO matter what programs are instilled by public schools, they can never take the place of the parent. if the parent is involved ,and the school is doing a crappy job, the parent will recognize this and attempt to change it, or get an interdistrict transfer posted by
sys_mom
on Jan 23, 2009 at 02:25 PM
It really is too bad that the area high schools need to spend so much of their budgets on noneducational expense items. Parents should encourage their children to be on time, respect school property and not cause problems while on campus. If our school districts didn't have to budget for the expense of tracking down truants, repairing senseless damage, replacing destroyed materials, or preventing drug use they could spend that money making our schools more interesting and well rounded places for learning. The more resources a community has to use up fixing citizen created problems the less funds there are available for improving that community's quality of life. Every pound of litter and every graffiti covered wall is a lost opportunity to fund a playground toy, a library book, a youth enrichment program, or senior citizen services. Please do what you can to encourage area students to do their best in school. Thank you. posted by
witbee
on Jan 23, 2009 at 02:55 PM
Every pound of litter and every graffiti covered wall is a lost opportunity to fund a playground toy, a library book, a youth enrichment program, or senior citizen services. Very well put. I can say as a parent, an educator, and a student of education, most often it is not the schools failing the students. It is the home and community. Most schools give every opportuinity for students to thrive. Teachers, councilors, administrators, aides, etc, bend over backwards, usually by law, to try and lift, push or drag students to place of educational accomplishment. But without parents and the community backing this effort with more than just lip service, little will be accomplished. Behind every successful student is a driven teacher, a devoted parent, and a success-fostering community. Not necessarily in that order. posted by
catpaw
on Jan 23, 2009 at 03:08 PM
I recently watched a 20/20 story that suggested the 4 year degree maybe overrated. The costs of completing college were scary. And there's no guarantee that the graduate will have a job in his (or her) field nor is it unheard of for a person of intelligence and initiative without a degree becoming a success. Several examples of vocational training of a demand skill--auto repair, for instance--suited the purposes of making a decent living and meeting the need for skilled workers. I certainly don't view formal education as wasted time but I do think college requires a level of maturity and sense of purpose that I would not expect from most kids who just graduated high school. posted by
casooner90
on Jan 23, 2009 at 03:38 PM
World needs brick layers too. While this sentiment may seem harsh (not popular), there are just some people that will not benefit from a college education. I don't know what that percentage is. Then there are some that are enticed with instant gratification (most?). This is the story of many that work out in the oil fields of Kern county. The money is good and lures many HS students away from college. I don't have the data on college graduation rate, but the UC published data on applied / enrolled is pretty dismal = 45%. My guess is that about half of the enrolled will drop out before achieving graduation. Does that put actual college graduate around 25% of HS graduate? Probably lower. I agree that all kids need to be pushed towards college, but not all should be forced and will do well in the end. Perhaps not as well as an average college graduate, but still good. Personally, I think most HS students should work first before attending college (i.e. military). Hard work, working with very little reward and working for incompetent boss are great motivators for college education. posted by
mrsearnhardt88
on Jan 23, 2009 at 03:40 PM
I certainly don't view formal education as wasted time but I do think college requires a level of maturity and sense of purpose that I would not expect from most kids who just graduated high school.
Very true. As a parent you have no guarantee that sending your child off to college and spending all that tuition money will actually result in them going to class. If they are not ready then it's a huge waste of money and time. Junior colleges in your home town are perfect for that transition period between youth and adulthood. They still have the classes to attend but can still live at home if necessary. Not all kids that age are mature enough to be serious about school, work and live on their own. Not to mention that JCs are much more affordable. Ultimately when you transfer from the 2 year school to a University and graduate, the diploma will say the University name. JCs are a great starting point. posted by
dirtyshirt
on Jan 23, 2009 at 03:47 PM
I am not saying that the last several posts are wrong, but you have to understand that education is one of the best determinants of social class. There are lots of reasons not to go; however if your family and your community wants to climb, education is the way to do it. The emphasis should be on how to get more kids in, not rationalizations about how it may not suit, is expensive, has an uncertain outcome, etc.... posted by
NancyII
on Jan 23, 2009 at 04:14 PM
The times were hard, many men had no work, and could get none. One such man walked from house to house, asking "Could I do any work for you, any at all ?". The answer always came back; "We have no work for you or anyone.". The persistant man persevered, he really had no other choice; and as he finally came into a different neighborhood, he once again knocked on a door. A 'lady' in very revealing clothing answered the door, listened to his bid for work, then told him "No, no work.". Saddened once again, he turned to try his fortune at the next house; but then the 'lady' called him back. She said to the stranger at her door; "What I need is a good bookkeeper, and if you can do the job, I'll hire you today." He replied "Lady, I cain't neither read nor write." And with that statement he lost his opportunity for permanent employment. The "madam" of the house closed the door, and again he left. Again after he had walked a but a short distance, she called him back. She had in her arm a sack of apples which she gave to him. He went to the corner of the block, and being hungry began to eat one of the apples. A man walked by and said "How much are your apples buddy ?" He replied, and sold an apple. He continued to stand there at that corner and there sold his last apple.
posted by
mrsearnhardt88
on Jan 23, 2009 at 04:26 PM
posted by
witterpitters
on Jan 23, 2009 at 04:31 PM
posted by
dirtyshirt
on Jan 23, 2009 at 04:35 PM
Cute story, but supports the myth that education does nothing for you. "Data from the 2002 U.S. Statistical abstract reveals an individual with a bachelor’s degree, on average, earns $65,922 per year. This is compared to yearly earnings of $36,722 for someone with a high school diploma. With a two-year Associate’s Degree, an individual can expect to earn 137% more than someone with only a high school diploma or equivalency." http://www.daltonstate.edu/... posted by
adampayne
on Jan 23, 2009 at 04:37 PM
Thank you all for the thoughtful comments. I lived in Sacramento for many years before relocating here a few years back. Sacramento has grown their community junior colleges from two older campuses at American River and Sacramento City that served 10,000 students in 1965 to four campuses that now serve more than 80,000 students. This year's crush of new students has overwhelmed even that far sighted and fairly well funded district. Education is a necessity in our modern world. Those that do not get an education will have no place to work and make a livable wage. Where education is heavily emphasized the higher the standards of living are. There is a reason the state of New Jersey has the highest median wage for all people residing in that state. They spend the most per pupil on education. Kern County is dramatically underserved when it comes to meeting our communities needs for higher education. We need to be much more proactive here than we currently are. And education is not strictly about four year degrees. Education is also about electricians, plumbers, nurses, construction and so many more technical applications where certifications are required. Thanks again for the commentary. posted by
witterpitters
on Jan 23, 2009 at 04:51 PM
Stop financing the academic development classes, those are the classes at B.C. for the students who did not learn reading, writing and math in HS and those who can't/don't speak English. Those teachers and those classrooms and those supplies that are purchased could be better utilized for legitimate English and math classes that a student on a graduation path needs/wants. If a student is coming out of one of our local HS UNprepared for even BC then either the HS are not doing their job or the student does not care. Either way it is a waste of time and money and the student should be directed to the adult school or a trade school. The fact that, as I understand it, CSUB also has academic development classes is totally ludicrous! A 4 year university? Those who cannot read/write English should be directed to the adult school on Mt Vernon. If or when they 'master' these components in a way that they can enter a regular college class without additional ESL classes, then come on up.
posted by
NancyII
on Jan 23, 2009 at 04:58 PM
DS..not true. It's only a humorous illustration that everyone has a chance. See the snopes reference. I'm grateful we have a community college system in our area. My granddaughter graduated from Kern Valley High and attended Cerro Coso before moving to AZ. She's now taking classes there and I'd have to check but believe it's ASU. A lot of kids can't afford, or aren't qualified, for a university and BC gives them a chance to get college classes under their belt and also to kind out what it's like to go to school when no one is watching over your shoulder. Whether or not you learn is totally up to you and that's too lenient for a lot of kids who need structure.
posted by
NancyII
on Jan 23, 2009 at 05:02 PM
posted by
Shwaine
on Jan 23, 2009 at 07:31 PM
Witters, if you have sports, you have remedial classes. I think it speaks more towards collegiate sports than the universities' academic offerings IMO. posted by
witterpitters
on Jan 23, 2009 at 07:47 PM
if you have sports, you have remedial classes Rather sad don't you think? BC is an excellent "jumping off point" for many. My daughter ewent there and got her A.S. then was able to transfer to Long Beach State as a junior and pick right up with her major. Again, my biggest complaint is the academic/remedial classes for people coming right out of HS................how crazxy is that?! posted by
witterpitters
on Jan 23, 2009 at 07:48 PM
posted by
jfrancais
on Jan 24, 2009 at 07:45 AM
Witters, if you have sports, you have remedial classes. That's not always true. The players on my college football team (DIII school) were all regular admits. They were not necessarily the brightest but they got in on their own academic merit. Division I is a little different, though. It's big business and they seem to have more "resources" to keep kids eligible. I just wish that the NCAA no longer existed and a new superleague for 18-24 year olds was created to operate as a farm system for pro sports. Then we can get rid of the antiquated notion of the student-athlete. posted by
jfrancais
on Jan 24, 2009 at 07:52 AM
A lot of kids can't afford, or aren't qualified, for a university and BC gives them a chance to get college classes under their belt and also to kind out what it's like to go to school when no one is watching over your shoulder. I don't have any stats before me, but the CSU system offers the most affordable education in the US. As a CA resident, there is no better deal at the 4 yr institution level. It's actually possible to work part-time (or full time) and pay your tuition as you go. posted by
NancyII
on Jan 24, 2009 at 07:59 AM
I agree with that Jf, my grandson went to Santa Cruz his first year out of high school on a scholorship. It was too liberal for him (and way too wet and cold) so he transferred to CSUB and from there, along with student loans, worked his way through college. My point was that BC is cheaper unit wise and a lot of kids just out of high school aren't ready for the unstructured college life. It's a pretty good chunk of change out of pocket for a quarter at Cal State.
1
Advertisement |