A blog about Business & Finance, Neighborhoods, and News.
About askthecalifornian


Member Since:
June 21, 2006
Last Signed In:
September 04, 2008
Profile Views:
4561
Blog Views:
42215
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
What can I do about my neighbor's overflowing trash cans?
Is a Sam's Club coming to Renfro and Rosedale?
What happened to the trees near the Ben Austin Senior Center?
Why no flag at Hart Park?
How would you describe Bakersfield's “spirituality”?
Who is going to save the Highway 99 oleanders?
What's up with DirectTV and local hi-def channels?
Is it illegal to turn without signaling?
Is Bass Pro Shops still coming to town?
Where's the dirt from the 178/Fairfax highway exchange going?
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
 


 

More archives


June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05
March 05
February 05
January 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


askthecalifornian - > Ask The Californian -> Questions about the auxiliary dam ...
Questions about the auxiliary dam ...

Q.: We have heard that the Lake Isabella Auxiliary Dam is not being repaired because the water rights are coming up for renewal in 2010. We also understand that the Los Angeles Metropolitan Water District intends to bid for the rights to the stored water.

Can you confirm this rumor or refute it?

Being a former employee of Kern County Land Company (KCL), I am aware that KCL joined with the Corps of Engineers financially to increase the height of the dam to make the proposed flood control project into a water storage project. The water stored in Lake Isabella should continue to be for the exclusive use of the residents and farms of Kern County.

— Karene R. Williams, Lake Isabella

A.: We consulted Bakersfield Water Resources Manager Florn Core for answers but it’s a bit complicated so let’s take it piece by piece.

We’ll start with repairs to the auxiliary dam.

The only thing holding up repairs is the time needed for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to find out what needs fixing and how to fix it, Core said.

The Corps should know what needs to be fixed by the end of 2008. Then it will start the design work for the repairs. Work on the dam should occur sometime between 2012 and 2014.

As for the rumor about Los Angeles Metropolitan Water District’s bid to stored water, Core says that’s not gonna happen.

First, water rights are not up for renewal. Rights to stored water in Isabella Lake are owned by two water storage district, North Kern and Kern Delta.

However, it could be that the maker of this rumor was confused by the outcome of a recent lawsuit between the two districts.

The 12-year court battle between North Kern and Kern Delta ended last year with a judge’s decision that one of the districts had forfeited its rights to some Kern River water.

That might mean forfeited water is up for grabs. But that’s up to the state Water Resources Control Board to decide.

Four water districts applied for the water if the board decides its available. But no Los Angeles districts were among the four.

Columnist Lois Henry recently wrote about the outcome of the lawsuit and you can read more about it on her blog.


 

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by askthecalifornian on Sunday, February 17, 2008 at 03:18 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 174 times
4 comments from 3 users

1

posted by maybelline on Feb 17, 2008 at 06:13 PM

It seems the interest in this topic is spreading!  Bravo.

posted by mannyb1 on Feb 20, 2008 at 08:48 AM

I commend the farmers of Kern County for using the 'trickle' system of irrigation. That is the least that they

can do, as they consume most (about 80%) of Kern water. The local residendents are NOT really good conservers

of water. Every summer visit to Bakersfield, I see torrids of water running down the gutters. That's what

the county gets for 'unmetered' water. It's FREE, so OK to waste. That is the wrong attitude. Kern Co. gets much of

it's water from the Friant Canal  (Bass Lake Area), especially since the Isabella dam storage has been diminished due

to a break. Of course many of the locals will disagree. They have told me they are self sufficient, which is wrong.

Water is a precious commodity that ALL Californians must SHARE in times of need. Fresno County helps Kern Co, so

Kern should help Los Angeles county. I have no 'DOG' in this fight, as I live in the North.

 

M. Barrera

posted by ChicoEsquela on Feb 20, 2008 at 08:58 AM

You got it right manny!

Except for helping those in LA! haha!

posted by maybelline on Feb 29, 2008 at 10:04 PM

Manny - please check your information that KC gets much of its water from the Friant.  There's a big old dude west of town called the California Aqueduct.  I don't believe the Friant brings water for regular folks to use.  It's for farmers.  Right?  Glad to read notes from Fresno.

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: