|
Time for the Green Machine to move onnn..... this is a shot in the dark, but here it goesss.... Will you marry me, Watermelon? So you want to be on top? I'm in love with a trader, a trader named Joe. I'M FREEEE; FREE FALLINN' CAUL the doctor, i'm about to BLOOM up! Wasn't the Sixth Sense enough...? fish out of water... i thought i was only fuhked up in the head... February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 Me in a nutshell :D
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Sunday Funday? Not for some.
While driving by Pin Oak Park today, on my way to run some errands, I saw something that just really saddens me. On a Sunday, a day of the week to just relax and unwind before the work week, people shouldn't be cleaning up after someone else. Unfortunately, I saw just this today. Right across the street from the park, a park that holds many childhood memories near and dear to me, a man was covering up some graffiti. For whatever reason, people find it ok to express meaningless and destructive artwork along the side of concrete walls that back houses, face schools, and enclose parks. Who knows if this man has a family, friends, or plans to pursue on this Sunday, but one thing is certain. I am sure he doesn't want to be covering up ugly graffiti in 95 degree weather. Whether you live in a nice neighborhood or "the bad part of town", graffiti is an eye sore and illegal. I just wish that there was more to be done regarding this issue... 15 comments from 13 users
1
posted by
samheath
on May 18, 2008 at 01:20 PM
It really is sad to see this kind of thing and makes Bakersfield and other cities where this happens look trashy and given over to barbarians. But you take your life in your hands trying to deal with it and the police have more serious matters to take care of. posted by
OjoReal
on May 18, 2008 at 07:36 PM
Get the spray cans out of taggers' hands. If they had to carry a quart can of paint and several brushes around with them at 2:00 am, I think they might be conspicuous as well as no longer inclined to consider it fun to deface others property because it would now require effort and therefore, resemble their worst nightmare: work. What would be the downside to requiring retailers to charge a hefty deposit on the purchase of a can of spray paint? The deposit would be refunded upon the return of the empty container. Since taggers might be reluctant to return the cans, unclaimed deposits would revert to local grafitti removal and prevention programs to relieve the burden on taxpayers. Whatdaya think? posted by
bakobornnraised
on May 18, 2008 at 07:45 PM
Looks to me like you've given this topic some serious thought and it's a positive direction to such a negative action... :D posted by
Rickldo
on May 18, 2008 at 08:00 PM
I guess Ojo's solution is better than what I had in mind... If you're caught tagging, you carry a brand, indelible ink all across your palms. That's for the first offense, second, the mark moves to your face. I live on the east side and am REALLY sick of seeing some idiots initials or street name scrawled over every available surface. Go mark up YOUR OWN house! Sorry, but this subject pushes a button... posted by
Rettchr
on May 18, 2008 at 09:30 PM
Good idea, Ojo. Why don't you propose that to the city council and/or county supervisors? The stores selling the spray paint could turn the deposit $$ over to the city or county and the person with the spray paint empties would have to return them to a specific city or county location to get their deposit back. posted by
OldBlue56
on May 18, 2008 at 10:17 PM
ojo, I personally don't like your idea. So me, a law abiding citizen, should have to take a can of spray paint back to the store to get my hefty deposit back? That is ridiculous. There are already enough laws on the books to regulate the sales of spray paint. posted by
bakobornnraised
on May 19, 2008 at 08:25 AM
Well, Oldblue, what do you have in mind to handle this problem more efficiently? I can understand you're fustration. I mean, why should law-abiding citizens have to take extra measures due to the stupidity of graffiti artists? It would mean having to go out of our ways just because teenagers can't control their immature spray can frenzies. All I want is for people to respect Bakersfield for what it is. Yes, our air is deadly and our summers are unbearable, but this is my home and I am sick of gang members and high schoolers treating it as if it was their personal canvas... posted by
adampayne
on May 19, 2008 at 11:19 AM
I think OjoReal's idea is a good one. I also believe mandatory community service with credits for school plus a small financial benefit to be put into a trust account for either a trade school or higher education should also be considered for all high schoolers. Most of these teen displays of frustration and anger result from boredom, and the inability to find any meaningful work. A program like Peace Corps or AmeriCorps for a local county to pursue to reach kids before they completely drop out of society sure beats the later alternatives of a growing prison population and unskilled labor force. Until the community takes a positive approach to the problem there will be no lasting solution. It is painfully obvious that incarcerating huge percentages of the population is not serving our nation's best interests. posted by
thetruthhurts
on May 19, 2008 at 11:23 AM
Tagging and Graffiti are two completely different things. There are many legit graffiti artists out there that would be very offended being grouped together with taggers. posted by
randomfactor
on May 19, 2008 at 11:26 AM
What would be the downside to requiring retailers to charge a hefty deposit on the purchase of a can of spray paint? The deposit would be refunded upon the return of the empty container. . The downside would be people like me, who occasionally use half a can on the odd project, and would have to "eat" the deposit as the can sat on the shelf in the garage. I think: first offense spraypainting someone else's property, donate a kidney to someone who needs one. Second offense: same. Third offense: won't be any. posted by
hughbetcha
on May 19, 2008 at 11:46 AM
How about this. When a tagger can be positively identified, rather than punish them we reward them an expenses-paid weekend at Pismo. Then, while they're gone, we spray paint their house, fences, walls, curbs, sidewalks...anything that stands still. We can work in shifts if need be. Just think how happy they will be to find out that we share a common interest! posted by
sys_mom
on May 19, 2008 at 12:16 PM
When my children were little if we passed by graffiti I would tell them something like this..."Look what those bad boys did. Now someone has to paint that over. When you make someone clean up a mess that you made it is just like stealing. You are stealing that person's time and you are stealing that person's money because they have to buy paint to cover up the graffiti." Then we would talk about how in the Bible we are told not to steal. Not everyone agrees with the Bible but there are many ideas to be found there that when followed make life nicer. We would also talk about how because those "taggers" used spray paint in such a wasteful and useless manner they were polluting the air. Because when spray paint gets used it puts chemicals into the air. Now my children know that their mom doesn’t like these bad boys because they steal and they pollute. Do any of you other parents talk to your children about graffiti? Do you say “what a mess” or “what a shame” or do you talk to your children about how it is wrong and they should not do it? Every day brings us opportunities to teach our children. Are you taking advantage of these opportunities? posted by
ChicoEsquela
on May 19, 2008 at 12:24 PM
ojo, I personally don't like your idea. So me, a law abiding citizen, should have to take a can of spray paint back to the store to get my hefty deposit back? That is ridiculous. There are already enough laws on the books to regulate the sales of spray paint. Right on OB! Ojo's idea is just another example of punishing the law abiding for the acts of a rew miscreants. We have laws on the books to take care of the taggers. Just ENFORCE THEM! (And if you think that is already happening, just do some research. You will find they are not The danger with these seemingly rational responses to crime is that normally rational people like Adam agree with additional laws that really only serve to make life more difficult for normal law abiding cits. They do nothing to get at the root of the problem.) posted by
ALICEN
on May 25, 2008 at 06:27 PM
Bako... There are some cities where these paint cans are not on display. One must go to a counter and request the paint. Sort of like having to ask a pharmacist for certain cold remedies. Now, I don't know if the purchaser must sign for the paint, but it sounds like a good idea to me -- even if a fake name is used. There are cameras almost everywhere. Where I live, spray paint is not on display, but it is in the store for purchase. Since I've never purchased a can of spray paint in my life, I don't know if one must sign. Even if you want to touch up your car, you can't just go take the paint off the shelf. It's a heck of a note, isn't it? Think of extra laws this way, though. Before 9/11/01 we could board a plane almost at will. Now look at us. posted by
ChicoEsquela
on May 25, 2008 at 07:17 PM
Alicen -- It is against the law to deface other's property (be that private individual or Govt). There are laws on the books now to deal with the people that do this type of crime. There are ways to deal with the little scumbags who utilize a can of spray paint to epitomize their existence for all to see........ Were we to get back to basics, and enforce the laws we now have -- the little darlings would be in stir......... they would have no spray cans......... So, Let us not worry about the "civil" rights of those like sf, to the point where we have none ourselves.
1
Our readers recommend: |