|
Children Begging at Northwest Promenade Accountability please you crazy woman. Teachers are to Pedophiles as Morticians are to Necrophiliacs Real Life Classes: Who Tells the Kids People are Jerks? Vegas, Mettler and Why People Leave This Town Globalization and Gin: Trade Schools Seem Swell A Martini Monday October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Accountability please you crazy woman.
http://www.bakersfield.com/... “He’s my little boy. He’s not just a case number. He’s my son,” she said. She said she wants to know why Kern County Probation didn’t put her son in a more secure home. Good questions there Wanda. I have questions too. Why isn't he living with you? Have you made life choices that might, in some roundabout off the wall way, impacted your son's life? Why is the first move some individuals make to blame the government or authorities for not being parents themselves? These agencies are overworked dealing with people who refuse to be good human beings and are shucking their responsibility as parents. You're blaming them for not placing him in a good home? Seriously? How about blaming yourself for not providing it in the first place? I'm amazed you have the gall to blame an agency publicly. Most case workers, police officers and social workers see crazy everyday, risk their lives to help the unfortunate and consistently are blamed for others' mistakes. THANK YOU to the City of Bakersfield for all the workers who do their job with little thanks and much criticism. 18 comments from 9 users
1
posted by
witterpitters
on Jan 15, 2008 at 01:11 PM
posted by
Lingtaowoo
on Jan 15, 2008 at 01:06 PM
The only way to know is to get the boy examined...and see whats up with him.....
posted by
witterpitters
on Jan 15, 2008 at 01:04 PM
Has anyone considered they boy might have a dual personality??? Happened to a family I know. Two girls, both parents in the home, wonderful home, educated parents, educated girls. One girl started ‘hearing voices’ hiding in her closet, buying stuff she didn’t need and never opening the package, disappearing for days, one day screaming at everyone the next day loving everyone. Scared one minute happy the next. The parents spent untold amounts of money over many years to get help for this girl via every avenue available. She is not bi-polar, or ADD or ADHD. Things have calmed down now and she is able to live on her own and she is now on disability as she cannot work with the problems she has. posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 15, 2008 at 12:15 PM
posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Jan 15, 2008 at 12:09 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 15, 2008 at 12:08 PM
The Republican Manifesto, on the other hand, is "to each according to his daddy." . But do continue. It will be entertaining to see how many vapid slogans you can parrot. posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Jan 15, 2008 at 12:00 PM
To each according to his need (and ability to fill out forms) From each according to his "good luck in life's lottery" That's the socialists credo Last best articulated by Dickie Gephart I believe posted by
randomfactor
on Jan 15, 2008 at 11:56 AM
No, a doctrinaire socialist says that we all benefit from government ownership of certain infrastructure components. For some reason that seems to terrify some people.
posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Jan 15, 2008 at 11:42 AM
Govt programs. Socialism. Someone else is to blame. Someone else can damn well fix it! I say look to yourself first. Then family. Then Church. Then other support systems. Finally, Govt. A doctrinaire socialist says just the opposite. posted by
bghayes
on Jan 15, 2008 at 11:32 AM
You're missing the main element of the blog post. It is the intrinsic nature of people to blame others. I'm not going after the kid for his problems. There is an immediate response for most people to find someone else to blame, rather than say 'what could I have done, or do in the future, to avoid this situation?" Also, the folly of others in this society should be discussed and debated so that all of us see where problems may lie. posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Jan 15, 2008 at 11:28 AM
It is much like a catastrophic illness -- it won't happen to me. And that thinking is operative. Until it does. Then your whole world changes. The "it could never happen to me" thinking goes bye bye and you either cowboy up to the sitrep at hand or fold like a cheap suitcase. Same with kids. Its easy to castigate parents for their kids misbehavior -- until it happens to us. Then and only then we become introspective. I still remain a staunch conservative, however, so never fear. You can still hate me with impunity. posted by
steveeswenson
on Jan 15, 2008 at 10:56 AM
That was a very thoughful post. (I was actually amazed it was you who wrote it). But the fact is that even in the best of homes, problems such as chemically imbalanced children and trauma from pre-adoption households rear up and overwhelm even the best of parents. I have friends who have faced such problems. We really don't know what this boy's problem is, how it began, and what his mother has tried to do about it. We also don't know what steps the home took to try and keep him there. Perhaps it's the media's job to try to find out these answers. But in situations like this, the people involved don't have to talk to us. posted by
bghayes
on Jan 15, 2008 at 10:50 AM
In the situation of this mother and in my experience, the situation of many parents I deal with daily, there is no accountability. I have yet to see this woman on the news acknowledge problems herself or assume that he may not want to call her. Rather she blames now her son's "mental illness" which at this point is undefined and is most likely depression or frustration. The root cause of that in most people is experience, traumatic or otherwise. She says he calls every four days or so. This family is not tight knit in the traditional sense of the word, he is clearly separated by the state from his mother and he voluntarily runs away repeatedly from his housing situations. This isn't a case for blaming mental illness or agencies. This is a case for speculation, which was invited when Ms. Robinson went to the news, as to why the kid ran away and where he is. Most obvious speculation: He's not happy with his family, life and housing. Why? posted by
ChicoEsquela
on Jan 15, 2008 at 10:40 AM
When I first saw the Mom on TV I was disgusted. Don't blame the system Mom, blame yourself. Then I saw her again and adjusted my thinking somewhat. She had calmed down a bit as far as blaming public agencies, etc. and was emoting about the boy's mental illness. I guess there's no way we can understand her feelings unless it has happened to us. It is easy to criticize the parents but sometimes you can have a kid that is just "out of control" and it may not be from nurture, rather it is a function of nature. Sometimes a kid can just be chemically unbalanced and of course drug use will only enhance this. Sometimes its the legal drugs kids are plied with to begin with more than ever nowdays. While it is tempting to do (and you know I like shooting from the hip [lip] ), knee jerk condemnation of the parents is sometimes not appropriate. Just like her blanket condemnation of Probation and some of the other public agencies she claims "failed her son"...... Sometimes you have to walk that mile in the other's moccasins...... I'm just glad there are people in these public agencies with the patience to put up with other peoples kids whose "cheese has slid off their cracker......" (I couldn't do it, admittedly) posted by
johnburnssucks
on Jan 15, 2008 at 09:42 AM
Missing child? Good little boy? Fourteen in no "little boy." When I was fifteen and growing up in San Diego, my fourteen-year-old friend changed from being an all-American kid who had played Little League and Pop Warner to a criminal who broke into houses. He told me a year or two later - I had started racing motorcycles and didn't see him too often - that he might be going to "Y.A." Turns out that was California Youth Authority. He did two stretches in prison, first when he was eighteen (for two years), and the second when he was thirty-five (three and a half years). He sold drugs. He was murdered in the summer of 2006 while he was - you guessed it - back in the drug business. This Gowan character doesn't need to be treated like a child. What he needs is the legal system's equivalent of having his butt kicked up between his shoulder blades. That's something he'll understand. posted by
woofwoof
on Jan 15, 2008 at 07:22 AM
..."something traumatic"? Yeah, those words ring weird, don't they? What happened that was so traumatic? No dad? Mother gone bad? He got molested? WHAT?
posted by
TresChicChef
on Jan 14, 2008 at 09:33 PM
“Christopher was a good little boy. Never got in trouble at school. Always happy around home,” she said. “Something traumatic happened to change this kid from a good kid to a bad kid.” If her son was such a "good little boy", then why is he living in a group home, in a completely different county to begin with? Why has he spent time in juvenile hall? And why is she bringing this to the attention of the press after 3 full weeks of him being gone? Regardless of his past history of running away, she should have reported him missing within the first couple of days. This woman appears to love her son, yet be so out of touch with reality! Her comment about something traumatic happening to him......just leaves me completely dumbfounded, yet angry at the same time. How in the h-e-double hockey sticks does she not know what this supposed event in his childhood was? Exactly where was she when this happened? While I share concern for her missing son, in many ways I can understand why he would want to run away from home to begin with. posted by
johnburnssucks
on Jan 14, 2008 at 08:09 PM
1
BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:Advertisement |