|
Ridin' the Wild Horse on Wall Street Dr BLTrivia: Name the 7-consecutive-Star-Search-winning-band that first played on this Dr BLTune Sign of the Times: Topic, tune and talk about the sign-stealing incident minus consequences We all Suck: Song inspired by the one Bako blogger who dared to be different Sing us a Song (We're the Taliban): Sung to Obama to the tune of Joel's "Piano Man" Reid between the Lines: Why does he always look so stern? Oh Nancy! Why is a non-partisan like me unabashedly bashing Pelosi in this rock song? Everything is Fallin' Apart (The Humpty Dumpty Song): I hope I'm wrong about the economy. Deal or no deal? Apparently, nobody asked House Republicans And I Quote: Excerpts from the Dr BLT interviews: Stealing signs may be a sign of a deeper rage. August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 http://www.drblt.net
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Marylee Shrider: BEWARE OF CONSERVA-PHOBIC SHARKS in these waters
I've posted it where it's likely to be eaten alive by sharks, under Marylee's brave and bold blog thread, so, at the risk of being redundant, I'll say it again, this time in bold print: For those about to bloodly the bakersfield.com blog waters, for those chopping at the blog bit, unspeakably eager to take a bite out of Marylee Shrider, how about sticking to the topic at hand instead of stooping to personal attacks? Marylee, you are absolutely correct, and bold for making such a statement, but you will be hated for that position. Those who are prejudiced against you don't understand the concept of protecting the traditional definition of marraige, while upholding the rights of gay people and extending love and kindness to them (following the commandment to love our neighbor as ourselves). So instead of making even the slightest effort to understand your position, they will simply resort to cheap shots, and ad hominem attacks. Prove me wrong folks. Come out with actual intelligent points of debate. 17 comments from 8 users
1
posted by
Wayfarer
on May 31, 2008 at 09:05 AM
posted by
samheath
on May 31, 2008 at 09:08 AM
As a curiosity Bruce, I wonder what the reaction would have been had those in Obama's church preached a sermon condemning homosexual so-called "marriage." posted by
gube
on May 31, 2008 at 09:10 AM
Why don't you mind your own business??????? Are you a co-dependent???????you act like one by coming to her rescue........you need to attend CA....Co-dependent Anonymous.... posted by
blognroll
on May 31, 2008 at 09:12 AM
If they used language and terms that were hateful towards gays, samheath I would condemn that hateful language, and those hateful words. We all have a right to our views and our opinions. We must learn to express those views with an attitude of genuine agape love. posted by
blognroll
on May 31, 2008 at 09:14 AM
Co-dependent? No, I would rather see it as supportive. We must all support one another when we witness an attack on a blogger here, even if that blogger doesn't represent our own beliefs. Yes, it is my business, gube, as it is yours, because our business as visitors of her blog thread is to respond. My hope is that folks will respond respectfully, and with the use of intelligent discourse, not churlish attacks. posted by
sagefever
on May 31, 2008 at 09:18 AM
I would have questioned the person who spoke those words ~ to answer your pondering Sam. What seems to escape you is simply put: Separate but equal is not equal.
posted by
blognroll
on May 31, 2008 at 09:27 AM
Separate but equal is not equal. Purple and blue are not equal. Does that mean when you say something is purple, you are discriminating against blue for not also calling it purple? posted by
sagefever
on May 31, 2008 at 09:32 AM
posted by
johnburnssucks
on May 31, 2008 at 09:38 AM
Gube, tomorrow is the start of Be Kind to Animals Week. BLT is just getting a head start. I'm sending Marylee a bale of hay. Even she has to eat. posted by
blognroll
on May 31, 2008 at 09:42 AM
posted by
johnburnssucks
on May 31, 2008 at 09:47 AM
Susan Allen has also had enough of Marylee's nonsense. Sooz is cute, Marylee is vomitingly ugly. Case closed. posted by
blognroll
on May 31, 2008 at 11:16 AM
sagefever, the main point of my blog thread is to urge folks to refrain from personal attacks. Do you find anything stupid or unintelligent about that concept? Don't you think that's an intelligent thing to do? That's the only point I'm trying to make here. You haven't taken the low road on this or on Marylee's blog. Others have. Others are out for blood. You are not. I don't consider you a ConservaPHOBIC shark. I'm convinced you're a decent human being. You are one of the ones I'm counting on to raise the bar in this conversation.
posted by
possummomma
on May 31, 2008 at 11:15 PM
I appreciate the sentiment of your post. In many ways, we're all guilty of saying hurtful things to one another and acting childish. I think your concept is fine. The application is what has raised the hackles of a few (not me, btw). In the past, I've been accused of using a large vocabulary and applying evidence/facts/data to support a position...as if that was a bad thing. I don't know what you would define as "the low road". It may be that I fit your criteria. I can say that I'm not out for her blood. I find myself annoyed not because of her conservative opinion on a topic, but because she's increasingly dismissive of others. And, in my opinion, she's starting to look like a caricature of conservatism. I keep hoping that, at some point in her posts, she'll discuss her articles. But, she doesn't seem interested in doing that. Rather, she drops these bombs that get the blogosphere riled up and walks away until the next time. In defense of Marylee, I have been trying to stop myself from carrying an opinion of people in the bako blogosphere. There are times when I read the article with a chip on my shoulder because of past behavior on their part or slights or just the picture of them I have in my head. That's wrong. I shouldn't do that. None of us should. I'm trying to read every post as if it were unrelated to past posts because I am starting to realize that we really and truly only see one side of people on these blogs. To say that we really know each other is pushing it (unless, of course, you hang out outside the blog or have history prior to the community). If someone were to ask me to name your favorite food or wife's name,....I wouldn't be able to give them that information. If someone asked me to tell them where Nancy was born, I couldn't tell you. So...how is it that we so quickly think we know a person on here? How is it that we can judge as fast as we do? I'll stop rambling now... posted by
blognroll
on May 31, 2008 at 11:41 PM
It's not rambling. Your comments are very insightful and reflective. The two of us come from very different places, but we always seem to find common ground. If more people with disparate positions could do that, I think this blogosphere, and, the world itself, would be a much better place. posted by
possummomma
on Jun 1, 2008 at 12:58 AM
Thanks for understanding what I was trying to say. There's just something about the internet that emboldens many of us to say things, or treat people in ways, that we wouldn't dare do face-to-face, in public. There are certain posters who I find myself disliking. And, when I stop to reflect on *why* I don't like them, I end up realizing that my dislike is for something they've said, not them in particular. posted by
ALICEN
on Jun 1, 2008 at 08:31 AM
Expressing an opinion is a great privilege. And it's true that I usually feel freer to express some opinions when they may be expressed, as it were, anonymously. Nevertheless, there is still an attempt made not to be contemptuous of another simply because he or she holds a different view than mine. Many of us forget that it is possible to disagree without a figurative six-inch serrated knife plunged wherever a soft spot may be found. In other words, can't we just get along? Why don't we try? posted by
blognroll
on Jun 1, 2008 at 09:17 AM
1
Our readers recommend: |