|
Red Light Cameras FOUND PUPPIES The Beaver Lives!!!! The Beaver Must Die? No Spell Check? Gardsman gets war medals back Great another street with 2 names Wesley Crawford NOT in the Kiwanis Club of Kern October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Red Light Cameras
Six U.S. cities have been found guilty of shortening the amber cycles below what is allowed by law on intersections equipped with cameras meant to catch red-light runners. The local governments in question have ignored the safety benefit of increasing the yellow light time and decided to install red-light cameras, shorten the yellow light duration, and collect the profits instead.
The cities in question include Union City, CA, Dallas and Lubbock, TX, Nashville and Chattanooga, TN, Springfield, MO, according to Motorists.org, which collected information from reports from around the country. This isn't the first time traffic cameras have been questioned as to their effectiveness in preventing accidents. In one case, the local government was forced to issue refunds by more than $1 million to motorists who were issued tickets for running red lights. The report goes on to note these are just instances that have been identified, and there may be more out there, and urges visitors to send in their own findings. 2 comments from 2 users
1
posted by
catpaw
on Mar 28, 2008 at 08:32 AM
Cameras were not meant to catch light runners as much as to insure safety at intersections. I hate to think that I'd lose my safe driver discount because city fathers got greedy. posted by
Maggiepoo
on Mar 28, 2008 at 08:39 AM
1
Our readers recommend: |