My view
Long time Bakersfield resident. Don't be surprised by my strong conservative views.

A blog about Hobbies & Crafts, Politics, and Sports & Recreation.
About casooner90


Gender:
male
Member Since:
March 14, 2006
Last Signed In:
November 21, 2009
Profile Views:
303
Blog Views:
5560
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Unemployement passes 10%
Conservatism coming back?
dj absent dave dodger fan ...
Transparent Administration?
Charlie Sheen Open Mouth - Insert foot
John Adams Project
I Pledge to ???
US Debt clock
Take Two Aspirin And Call Me When Your Cancer is Stage 4
Highlights from the health care bill
Archives
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


casooner90 - > My view -> Democratic Congress May Adjourn, Leave Crisis to Fed, Treasury
Democratic Congress May Adjourn, Leave Crisis to Fed, Treasury
Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by casooner90 on Thursday, September 18, 2008 at 06:03 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 61 times
12 comments from 10 users

1

posted by ronmexico on Sep 18, 2008 at 07:02 PM

Is anyone really suprised by the leadership of the Democrat controlled congress??

posted by gopherbro on Sep 18, 2008 at 08:23 PM

What do you expect Congress to do?  The only type of legislation that could be passed on the spur-of-the-moment would be a knee jerk reaction instead of a thought-out remedy.  There is no guarantee that President Bush would sign anything that Congress could come up with.

Who was in control of Congress from 1996 until the last election? Oh, yes, the Republicans, who dismantled every regulatory procedure intended to safeguard the American public that they could think of.  Who was in charge of the SEC in 2005 when the strings were loosened so that liability exposure no longer had to bear a reasonable relationship to capital for broker-dealers? Whose Controller of the Currency ruled that Federal Banks were exempt from state predatory lending laws?  What party does Phil Gramm belong to?   Can you find a single important Republican, in the last 10 years, who ever said that more regulation was needed in the financial industry to protect the American public?

Jeez, Louise, give us a break!

posted by FloridaStateGrad on Sep 18, 2008 at 09:20 PM

So.. let me get this straight.. it's the Republicans who are decrying the decision to not make any rash decisions on getting involved in the economy.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that a complete contradiction of idealogy?

 

posted by Ray_Harwick on Sep 18, 2008 at 11:29 PM

JOHN MCCAIN said NOTHING could be done until AFTER the election. SO DID BARACK OBAMA!  They're both right and it's commendable of them to not make any hasty decisions.  They could demand that the sitting president do something, but the sitting president is RESPONSIBLE for this financial disaster. What advice could he possibly offer and what action could he possibly take in the course of two months that would help?  He had EIGHT years to reform these corporate thieves and he had the backing of both Obama AND McCain, both of whom sponsored reforms of Fanny and Freddie.  Our candidates and our congress are really powerless to do anything except throw money at the problem (which we have) and start with a clean slate come January.

Even JOHN MCCAIN agrees with that!

posted by Ray_Harwick on Sep 18, 2008 at 11:48 PM

Don't be surprised by my strong conservative views.

What conservative view do you mean by this statement?  Small government?  Ask George Bush about that? Fiscal responsibility? You're griping about a congress that will undergo a change leadership in a matter of 47 days and you expect this one to completely OVERHAUL the financial system without any DEBATE?  What kind of conservative are you!!!!!

We haven't even heard what John McCain's plan IS!  Obama's plan is posted on his web site! All we've heard from McCain is "The economy is basically strong," and "We're going to fix it," and "We're going to reform."  Great!!!!!! HOW?

posted by ChicaEsquela on Sep 19, 2008 at 07:47 AM

Hypocrisy....republican be thy name!

posted by randomfactor on Sep 19, 2008 at 07:52 AM

Is anyone really suprised by the leadership of the Democrat controlled congress??

I am.  They played the Republicans for fools on the offshore drilling issue, something I never thought I'd see from this Congress. 

There's not a chance we'd get a *GOOD* bill out by the end of the Congress regarding the financial crisis anyway, what with the Republicans' stonewalling.  Better to wait until January, with a larger majority and the White House to work with.

posted by TSM on Sep 19, 2008 at 08:49 AM

 

ABC News' George Stephanopoulos reports: In a letter to President Bush, Speaker Nancy Pelosi offered this afternoon to postpone Congress' planned adjournment next Friday, Sept. 26, to address the ongoing financial crisis.

In the letter, Pelosi says she wants to ensure a consistent approach to the "ongoing market turmoil" by developing a bipartisan recovery effort.

The speaker's letter signals that Democrats are prepared to accept the president's plan for Wall Street, but also demands a second stimulus package targeted at Main Street.

Pelosi says such a package must include five components: "Investment in infrastructure for economic growth and job creation here at home, home heating assistance at a time of record energy costs, extended Unemployment Insurance for the growing number of Americans looking for work, Food Stamps that will help ensure we feed hungry families in a time of crisis, and assistance to maintain critical health care coverage jeopardized by state budget cuts."


posted by witterpitters on Sep 19, 2008 at 09:07 AM

How interesting that one one day Pelosi decries Bush's proposed bailout then the next day says 'well ok....BUT, here's OUR rules.'

"Investment in infrastructure for economic growth and job creation here at home, home heating assistance at a time of record energy costs, extended Unemployment Insurance for the growing number of Americans looking for work, Food Stamps that will help ensure we feed hungry families in a time of crisis, and assistance to maintain critical health care coverage jeopardized by state budget cuts."

Somehow this looks like, 'see the DEMS can save you' AND you will be obliged to us for saving you soooooooooo - NOW we will take over your lives totally.......can you speak Chinese? Russian? Don't you UNDERSTAND YO-bama will put a grain of rice on every plate? We will hire all Americans for the plant we will build to manufacture all the burquas we will need.

Yes indeed folks, the sky IS falling.

 

posted by ProgressivePete2 on Sep 19, 2008 at 09:37 AM

"Investment in infrastructure for economic growth and job creation here at home, home heating assistance at a time of record energy costs, extended Unemployment Insurance for the growing number of Americans looking for work, Food Stamps that will help ensure we feed hungry families in a time of crisis, and assistance to maintain critical health care coverage jeopardized by state budget cuts."

 

I'm sorry, but where exactly is the bad part of the list above? 

posted by randomfactor on Sep 19, 2008 at 10:13 AM

The last five words, Pete.

.

Yes indeed folks, the sky IS falling.

*NOW* she gets it.  We've been trying to tell her that for years.

posted by TomW on Sep 19, 2008 at 10:17 AM

Yeah, we need a president who doesn't see every crisis as an oppourtunity for his rich friends to fleece Americans.

 

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement