|
McCain Backers Testosterone Levels Dropped After Loss Obama's Nobel Peace Prize: How Did That Happen? Obama Song: The Sad, Sorry Truth Conservatives Give - But Only to Their Churches Getting All Wee Weed Up Right Wing Poster Boy Gladney Needs Insurance Reform Sitting Here Awaiting the Obama Presser Anxiously A Tale of Two Kings: Jackson and Presley Fourth of July Weekend Open Invite What Does Coleman v. Franken Tell Us About Bush v. Gore? November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09 Sloganeering, platitiudes, 'gotcha' politicking - everyone recognizes it and everyone complains about it when it's aimed at them. It takes real dedication to avoid it. The way to proceed, I believe, is to avoid the desire to be humorous or cute in the midst of a serious political discussion. Avoid negative mental habits, fear or hate mongering and demonizing the opposition. Remember the truth in physics is simple; in politics it's complicated. If you can't name your views, the opposition's views and a third view, then you don't adequately understand the topic. The posts here will, at times, be lengthy but I will also support them with ample references, usually in the form of links, so that the reader will be left with more than just my position on a topic, but hopefully some information beyond that.
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Fewer Americans Identify with Religion - Poll
This year's repetition of the American Religious Identification Survey has released their results and found that the number of people who declare they don't identify with any religion has risen again, this time to fifteen percent. (http://www.cbsnews.com/stor... Previous reported levels were 14.2 in 2001 and 8.2 in 1990. It would seem that the rise in the numbers of such people is leveling off. If the rate between '90 and '01 had continued til today, the poll would have reported 18.2% more or less today. There is much to discuss because of this. Why has the decline in religion's popularity leveled? Is it like the abortion rate, which seem to answer to liberal social programs moreso than the pro-life efforts of conservatives? (http://www.publicchristian.... Is it possible that the social concerns of liberals help religion succeed as well? The concurrent trends tend to support the idea. The poll had another item worthy of political analysis: the biggest (and growing) relgious group is Catholics. Their growth comes primarily from Catholics in California, Texas and Florida. That's right. Latino immigration. What does that mean to a Republican party which has long used abortion as a unifying clarion call for Christians generally, but also has very strong views on illegal immigration in those three states especially? The fact that these policy choices are causing a rift in the Republicans has already been demonstrated since the 2006 elections. (http://www.apsanet.org/imgt... Ironically, I think the data increasingly shows that those who are interested in social conservatism as opposed to, say, fiscal conservatism, should be backing Democratic efforts. If, that is, real results are more important than ideology and party fetishism. One can understand, however, why pary die-hards would resist this data even moreso, since the party has already handed the game ball away when it comes to fiscal conservatism. (We don't need to reference the failures in this area any more, do we?) Truly: what do the Republicans have left to claim as their raison d'etre? I'm thinking they should re-organize. As Tories. 37 comments from 14 users
1
posted by
Infowar
on Mar 9, 2009 at 05:49 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Mar 9, 2009 at 05:53 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Mar 9, 2009 at 05:54 PM
Soon the unbelievers will outnumber the mainstream Protestants, or the Catholics. The Catholics especially, if Pope Ratzi keeps his current course. posted by
dirtyshirt
on Mar 9, 2009 at 05:56 PM
The left-right paradigm is an analytical tool that has transhistorical usefulness. Like all such tools, it has its limitations. But I don't think replacing it with a wet blanket like "they're all like that" is useful. posted by
Infowar
on Mar 9, 2009 at 06:00 PM
man enough with the stupid "conspiracy theory " insult. The religion debate is a distraction. Coffee? I drink coffee often. I know you can't stand me random. So what..... posted by
Infowar
on Mar 9, 2009 at 06:07 PM
I don't think you completely understood what I meant by 'false left-right paradigm'. Well I don't have time at the moment to "debate"...I am off to my parents basement to conjure up more conspiracy theories. posted by
dirtyshirt
on Mar 9, 2009 at 06:17 PM
infowar: if I've misunderstood, I would genuinely like to know, with my apologies. What did you mean? btw, parent's basement line brought real smiles. funny. posted by
refiguy
on Mar 9, 2009 at 06:41 PM
Gospel of Matthew: A Biblical History Gospel of Matthew: The Outline and Structure Gospel of Matthew: What is the Significance? Gospel of Matthew: The Final Chapter & Great Commission
Gospel of St. Thomas - What Is It? Gospel of St. Thomas - Who Wrote It? Gospel of St. Thomas - What Does It Say? Gospel of St. Thomas - Why isn't it in the Bible?
Gospel of St. Thomas - What Is It? Gospel of St. Thomas - Who Wrote It? Gospel of St. Thomas - What Does It Say? Gospel of St. Thomas - Why isn't it in the Bible? http://www.AllAboutTruth.or... ">Learn More Now!
posted by
refiguy
on Mar 9, 2009 at 06:42 PM
Gospel of St. Thomas - What Is It? Gospel of St. Thomas - Who Wrote It? Gospel of St. Thomas - What Does It Say? Gospel of St. Thomas - Why isn't it in the Bible? http://www.AllAboutTruth.or... ">Learn More Now!
Gospel of Mark: A Biblical History Gospel of Mark: The Outline and Structure Gospel of Mark: What is the Significance? http://www.AllAboutJesusChr... ">Grow More Now!
You are here: Jesus Christ >> Gospel Of Mark
Gospel of Mark: A Biblical History Gospel of Mark: The Outline and Structure Gospel of Mark: What is the Significance? http://www.AllAboutJesusChr... ">Grow More Now! posted by
sagefever
on Mar 9, 2009 at 07:01 PM
Interesting survey~ I noticed the "spiritual" but not religious option was not really mentioned. Funny but I loved the "Gospel of Saint Thomas"~ some rather striking phrases there. posted by
H8cloz
on Mar 9, 2009 at 07:16 PM
Fewer Americans identify with religion? Hooray! Its about time. Best news I've heard so far this year. I hope the percentage keeps going up. It's about time we moved out of make believe land and into the real world. Now we just have to work on our "clothing" dependency... posted by
dirtyshirt
on Mar 9, 2009 at 07:29 PM
posted by
sagefever
on Mar 9, 2009 at 07:32 PM
posted by
VirgilAnderson
on Mar 9, 2009 at 07:34 PM
posted by
vanityfair
on Mar 9, 2009 at 07:36 PM
dirtyshirt, that looks like some good ol' fashioned spamming to me. Another blogger used to do that quite often. posted by
shankus
on Mar 10, 2009 at 07:18 AM
For myself, I transmogrified from "spiritual" to completely atheist about 2000. Before then, I still had no identity with religion. I was raised Catholic and stopped attending mass at age 14, when my parents no longer made me go. My atheism continues to "solidify" and I'm more active in it's pursuit than I was with "spiritualiy". I found what works, at least for me. Science rules. posted by
randomfactor
on Mar 10, 2009 at 07:40 AM
How would you folks define "spiritual" as in "spiritual but not religious"? . Scholars aren't sure who wrote the Gospel of St. Thomas. Or any other "gospel." None was written by eyewitnesses or even contemporaries. posted by
ApolloDawn
on Mar 10, 2009 at 07:53 AM
How would you folks define "spiritual" as in "spiritual but not religious"? I typed a long answer to that, and the stupid site swallowed it. Everyone's loss. posted by
siouxcityranch
on Mar 10, 2009 at 08:17 AM
posted by
VirgilAnderson
on Mar 10, 2009 at 08:39 AM
Apparently, god thoughts and social thoughts involve the same kind of brain activity: http://www.npr.org/template... It's rather exciting. --virgil posted by
randomfactor
on Mar 10, 2009 at 09:12 AM
posted by
VirgilAnderson
on Mar 10, 2009 at 09:14 AM
posted by
VirgilAnderson
on Mar 10, 2009 at 09:16 AM
posted by
VirgilAnderson
on Mar 10, 2009 at 09:21 AM
Many hallucinations seem quite real to those experiencing them.
They are real - Absolutely! The difference between a good hallucination and a bad one, though, can be measured only in the behavior that may happen as a result of the hallucination experience. "you know them by their fruits" --virgil posted by
randomfactor
on Mar 10, 2009 at 09:23 AM
posted by
VirgilAnderson
on Mar 10, 2009 at 09:28 AM
Too bad for you. You might have shared your privileged knowledge with family and friends. They could have helped in seeing the end results of your ideas about the stock market, measuring the potential profits of the unicorn's notions. --virgil posted by
VirgilAnderson
on Mar 10, 2009 at 09:50 AM
posted by
catpaw
on Mar 10, 2009 at 10:02 AM
Organized religions are not a democracy. Yet, religious spokesmen assert themselves as knowing what a democratic government should be. I am astounded that they don't see the obvious conflict of interest.
posted by
randomfactor
on Mar 10, 2009 at 10:22 AM
Organized religions are not a democracy. Sure they are. People vote with their feet. And that's why organized Christianity is dwindling, in particular the most dogmatic sects: they *DON'T* know what is needed to run a successful organization. posted by
dirtyshirt
on Mar 10, 2009 at 10:52 AM
How would you folks define "spiritual" as in "spiritual but not religious"? There is the first point of divergence, which purports that organized religion is seperate from feelings of spirituality. There are others, which point out that feelings of connectedness, superstition, ancestor or nature worship or simply self conversation and knowing, or acknowledgement of the weightiness of existence and our part in it, including that the collected weight of all of us past and present may amount to something more than the sum of the parts and other ideas are separable from the belief in a distinct and unique intelligence that controls everything. The problem with spirituality and religion in our society is that the big faiths (Christian, Jewish and Muslim primarily) have co-opted spirituality so completely that we don't 'give credit' for the spirtitual feelings of people outside any of these institutions. Despite the fact that I am a Catholic, I don't think we should kick the non-religious folks off the bus. posted by
sagefever
on Mar 10, 2009 at 11:44 AM
DS~ I have my beliefs for quite sometime and after both of my boys died so close together I did a reexamination of them,in depth. I know I do not "know",I know I could never presume to tell another the "right' path or the wrong path. My "goddess/god" concept is so huge that no human mind can conceive it,contain or constrain "it".Mostly it boils down to being the best person I can possibly be,for most of my time here.It is love and laughter,not spite.It is being joyous and thankful. It is to be living for today,this moment~ which is it's own reward,the only one I "expect". The spiritual warriors battle is always and only with the self,to bring forth the Self. What is to come~ or not come~ is the Great Mystery. Beyond our knowing and rightfully so.
posted by
witterpitters
on Mar 10, 2009 at 12:15 PM
IMO, religion in and of itself is an outside faction that some feel the need for in order to "connect" with God or whomever they choose to believe in. Spirituality is within ones own self. For instance, I "see" wonderful things in the flowers, trees, animals, sunsets, sunrise, even storms. I personally do not need to go to a building (church) to know there is something greater then myself that is "managing" things. There are reasons we may not understand for the horrific disasters, the melt down of country's/nations, the illnesses, the suffering. There are also reasons for the reversal of those situations to something good. Look what this is happening in this country right now. Yes, there are those who are evil who are taking advantage of the helpless, however, there are equally those who are stepping up to the plate with the goodness within them to help those who are lost. Restaurants offering food that you pay what you can; neighbors once again helping neighbors, especially the elderly; others offering to care for children so the parent can look for a job; dry cleaners offering free cleaning service for someone looking for a job; medical people who are donating their time for little ones..............the list goes on and on how this country, in spite of or because of "O" and his "O"thers trying to smack us down. posted by
dirtyshirt
on Mar 10, 2009 at 12:35 PM
"in spite of or because of "O" and his "O"thers trying to smack us down." The point of this post reflects my thinking on Obama's administration, religion and LIberalism vs. Conservatism generally. I believe that the good men do comes from their Liberal leanings. If one believes that goodness comes from market forces, and one can force oneself to hold on to that belief even in the face of our current mortgage crisis, then I suppose a little data that suggests that humantarian politics leads to humantarian acts need not be addressed. posted by
witterpitters
on Mar 10, 2009 at 12:43 PM
posted by
sagefever
on Mar 10, 2009 at 12:50 PM
witters ~I guess I am a "o"thers and believe me,smacking you down is not on my list...check your e-mail BTW. OT but you'll like it. posted by
montfred
on Mar 10, 2009 at 02:41 PM
Great post! My thoughts:
In, looking at my own life, I would tend to believe that the parity of the NFL, is the major factor for these findings. Seriously though, I am not surprised by the results of this study. I look around this country, and see that the vast majority of 'TV watchers' this week, tuned into the likes of; American Idol Tuesday, American Idol Wednesday, CSI, American Idol Thur, Bachelor (after final rose(s)??), The Bachelor, Two and a Half Men, and number 8 was Desperate Housewives. Someone, once told me that, 'you can learn a lot about the people in a town by, looking at the movie section of the local newspaper. I think the same can be said of the television habits of a nation. On the political side, the Republican Megachurch's (and the Catholic Church) throughout the land preach that we must defeat any one who takes a pro-choice position. Case-closed. So, to have voted for Obama; the church member had to thoughtfully choose to deny his churches leadership. I would think that would make such a member, reconsider the teaching of his church. Leaving said member with the options of continuing to worship in such a place, find a church which provides a more liberal teaching approach, or lastly, to just give up and watch some TV. The key is that there is a true left and a true right in American religion and culture, but that these opposing doctrinal camps are not where the real action is these days. For better and for worse, the heartbeat of America is found in the mushy middle — even on a topic like abortion. Looking at the extremes, the survey asked if abortion should be “illegal in all circumstances” or “legal for any reason at any time during pregnancy.” But in between, participants could say that abortion should remain legal to “save the life of the mother” or legal in cases involving rape or incest. They could also say that abortion should be legal “for any reason” during the first three months or the first six months” of pregnancy. When the like's of U.S. Congressmen Kevin McCarthy is thought to be that of 'a fine Christian young man.' I answer that he may or may not be that, but Kevin McCarthy's voting record is that, he is not. Here is a congressmen who voted to cast the poorest among us out into the streets, and take possession of their homes; rather than allow a bankruptcy court to adjust the terms of their mortgages. Judges already have had the authority to reduce the principal on loans backed by almost all forms of property -- including second homes, cars and boats -- but not on primary residences, and before that can even happen, homeowners would have to seek a voluntary modification from their lender and agree to share any profits if they sell the house within five years. "This is the same opportunity that owners of vacation homes, investment properties, private jets [and] luxury yachts have long enjoyed," said Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose). "I think it's only fair that we offer it now to average families as well." Claiming to be a Christian is easy, attending church every week or so is not difficult, but being a slave (or as Jesus calls them 'friends' -John 15.14) is not easy, in fact, it is impossible, but we can strive for that. Or not. posted by
dirtyshirt
on Mar 10, 2009 at 04:02 PM
montfred: Thanks for a thoughtful response. I agree, especially with your insights on Kevin McCarthy. No surprise, even to Conservatives, that a person might claim a Christian foundation and behave in an entirely different fashion. If we could move past the divisiveness of abortion, perhaps by concentrating on results rather than stances, then we might have a chance at rooting out such hypocrisy.
1
Advertisement |