The View From Here

A blog about Politics.
About drilnliftcrude


Member Since:
March 14, 2006
Last Signed In:
November 21, 2009
Profile Views:
1859
Blog Views:
17056
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Yet Another "Taxes Are For Little People" Story
Heckuva Job There, Eric
So How's That Auto Bailout Going?
Liberal Activist Group Thinks Ft Hood Killer Was Speaking For The American Military Officer Corp
The Right Decision To Use The A-Bomb To End WWII?
How Low Will He Go?
The Khalid Shiekh Mohammed Lower Manhattan Reunion Tour
Obama Snubs Fort Hood To Relax At Camp David
Government Run Health Care
Gruesome Halloween Food
Archives
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
January 09
February 09
March 09
April 09
May 09
June 09
July 09
August 09
September 09
October 09
November 09
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


drilnliftcrude - > The View From Here -> Save The Planet: Eat A Dog?
Save The Planet: Eat A Dog?

The choice is simple, Fido or global warming.  The world is not supposed to be fair.

 

The eco-pawprint of a pet dog is twice that of a 4.6-litre Land Cruiser driven 10,000 kilometres a year, researchers have found.

Victoria University professors Brenda and Robert Vale, architects who specialise in sustainable living, say pet owners should swap cats and dogs for creatures they can eat, such as chickens or rabbits, in their provocative new book Time to Eat the Dog: The real guide to sustainable living.

The couple have assessed the carbon emissions created bypopular pets, taking into account the ingredients of pet food and the land needed to create them.

"If you have a German shepherd or similar-sized dog, for example, its impact every year is exactly the same as driving a large car around," Brenda Vale said.

"A lot of people worry about having SUVs but they don't worry about having Alsatians and what we are saying is, well, maybe you should be because the environmental impact ... is comparable."

In a study published in New Scientist, they calculated a medium dog eats 164 kilograms of meat and 95kg of cereals every year. It takes 43.3 square metres of land to produce 1kg of chicken a year. This means it takes 0.84 hectares to feed Fido.

They compared this with the footprint of a Toyota Land Cruiser, driven 10,000km a year, which uses 55.1 gigajoules (the energy used to build and fuel it). One hectare of land can produce 135 gigajoules a year, which means the vehicle's eco-footprint is 0.41ha – less than half of the dog's.

They found cats have an eco-footprint of 0.15ha – slightly less than a Volkswagen Golf. Hamsters have a footprint of 0.014ha – keeping two of them is equivalent to owning a plasma TV.

Professor Vale says the title of the book is meant to shock, but the couple, who do not have a cat or dog, believe the reintroduction of non-carnivorous pets into urban areas would help slow down global warming.

"The title of the book is a little bit of a shock tactic, I think, but though we are not advocating eating anyone's pet cat or dog there is certainly some truth in the fact that if we have edible pets like chickens for their eggs and meat, and rabbits and pigs, we will be compensating for the impact of other things on our environment."

Professor Vale took her message to Wellington City Council last year, but councillors said banning traditional pets or letting people keep food animals in their homes were not acceptable options.

Kelly Jeffery, a Paraparaumu german shepherd breederwho once owned a large SUV, said eliminating traditional pets was "over the top".

"I think we need animals because they are a positive in our society. We can all make little changes to reduce carbon footprints but without pointing the finger at pets, which are part of family networks."

Owning rabbits is legal anywhere. Local bodies allow chickens, with some restrictions.

YOUR PET'S MARK

The eco-footprints of the family pet each year as calculated by the Vales:

German shepherds: 1.1 hectares, compared with 0.41ha for a large SUV.

Cats: 0.15ha (slightly less than a Volkswagen Golf). Hamsters: 0.014ha (two of them equate to a medium-sized plasma TV).

Goldfish: 0.00034ha (an eco-finprint equal to two cellphones).  

http://www.stuff.co.nz/domi...

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by drilnliftcrude on Thursday, October 22, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 86 times
13 comments from 11 users

1

posted by pinkchampagne on Oct 22, 2009 at 12:53 PM

Interesting information.  I know there are several brands of vegetarian dog food out there.  I know I've seen some pretty outrageous numbers about the environmental cost of raising livestock.  If people go veg/vegan, it won't matter too much what our pets are eating. 

posted by goldilox on Oct 22, 2009 at 01:00 PM

I will ditch the 4WD King-Cab and my cell phone before i saute fido ...

posted by Shwaine on Oct 22, 2009 at 01:23 PM

You could always buy local for your pet food, reduce the carbon "pawprint" by reducing how much gas is used in shipping pet food around the world. I picked up a brochure at the Fair from a local pet food company called Nature's Select. I've not tried them, but they are a local company, so I would imagine that's a good place to start if you want to reduce the impact your pet has on the environment. They even deliver to your door for free according to the brochure.

Oh, and on the topic of vegetarian pet foods, only try that for dogs, which are not obligate carnivores so they can adapt to a vegetarian diet, particularly one that includes eggs and dairy. I wouldn't try it with cats since they are obligate carnivores, which means they require meat in their diet. From my reading on the subject, cats cannot convert all plant-based amino acids into the required forms needed for metabolism, so they do poorly on vegetarian diets unless supplemented with synthetic amino acids (and even that may not be good enough). I've also seen some semi-vegetarian diets which contain fish, but even that is not quite right for cats. Despite the popular image of cats dining on fish, cats really dine on rodents and birds when left to their own devices. It's a totally different nutritional profile and cats would do fine without any fish as long as you gave them poultry or small game meat.

Besides, any pet owner knows the real eco-unfriendliness is not what goes in the animal... it's what comes out of the animal (and all the plastic baggies used to clean up after such messes)....

posted by anglo1 on Oct 22, 2009 at 01:33 PM

A real win-win situation would be if I could train my four pound Yorkie to eat the cats in the neighborhood.

posted by notatroll on Oct 22, 2009 at 01:46 PM

I think the cats in my neighborhood consider a four pound yorkie to be an appetizer.  Some of the rats might also.

posted by siouxcityranch on Oct 22, 2009 at 01:47 PM

hhah sound advice shwaine..and it was funny too

Im with you goldi..but if this ever became an option my philipino friends say the black dogs taste best..*YUM*

i remember one night when i was working at the refinery i ran one room and a philipino guy ran the one after mine..what he did in his room affected how mine ran..this particular night he kept cranking his machinery up and down which in turn caused me to run my tail off to compensate..finally about 3am i had enough and drug him  outside..I said Emy what the hells wrong with you tonight..he looked up at the sky with tears in his eys and said "my cousin he ate my dog"...

At first I thought he was kidding but then he went on to say while he was asleep during the afternoon his cousin and his buddys were at his house drinking beer in the back yard..they got the munchys and fired up the barbee..fidos demise was enevitable ..i think i woulda missed work that night because i woulda been in jail from beatin hell outta those guys..Id never witnessed Emy ever get emotional before or after that so it obviously tore the poor guy up..

I cant fathom how those guys think..dont want too..they are called mans best friend for a reason..

posted by goldilox on Oct 22, 2009 at 01:51 PM

augh, wow

(crazy avitar too)

i swear the street tacos in tj are made of dog-meat

posted by donmason on Oct 22, 2009 at 02:04 PM

What a crock.

 

Some wrong assumptions, and they ignored conversion efficiencies from the real world to make the case.

 

Total solar energy that falls on a hectare per year is 14,600 GJ, and that’s in the south Sahara desert. 

 

Plants capture less than  one percent of the total energy.

 

Her figure of 135 KJ is the entire plant mass, not the net recoverable fuel energy. Take the oil seeds as bio fuel and the total is less than 10% of 135 KJ. Once energy return on energy invested is considered to produce the fuel for the mythical Land Cruiser, you’d have less than 20KJ of fuel equivalent.

 

1 gallon of diesel is about 0.15 GJ.

 

20 x 0.15 = 3 gallons of fuel per year per hectare net at best.

 

She says .84 hectare to feed Fido per year.

 

That’s 2 1/ 2 gallons of fuel for the land cruiser.

 

I’ll keep Fido.

posted by goldilox on Oct 22, 2009 at 02:42 PM

i love smart-math people!  good job donm !

posted by catpaw on Oct 22, 2009 at 03:55 PM

Between dogs, cats, and cow gas on dairies, we are all doomed.

But the polar bears are on the way out.....is that good news?

posted by witterpitters on Oct 22, 2009 at 07:00 PM

CATPAW:  can we add my husband to your list of 'gasses'?


posted by midterm2 on Oct 22, 2009 at 08:27 PM

Al Gore's carbon footprint is HUGE.  I think we need to bar-b-que him, along with a basket of delta smelt, and feed them to the homeless. That should save a few dogs and cats under cap and trade regulations, right?  LOL 

posted by jmabbott888 on Oct 22, 2009 at 11:28 PM

Us meat eaters are helping the planet more than the vegans.... We eat the cows that pollute the enviroment. This coming from a PETA member.... Only in my mind PETA stands for People Eating Tasty Animals. lol

1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

Advertisement