About dusty1215


Gender:
female
Member Since:
March 14, 2006
Last Signed In:
December 11, 2007
Profile Views:
21269
Blog Views:
74593
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Bond's record-setting baseball will go into the HOF with an asterisk.
"distract, delude, amuse and insulate us."
People trust the Democrats more than they trust Republicans.
Are you smarter than the average American? Test your knowledge of the news..
Neo-Nazi's go after the Jena 6
Feds investigating Blackwater USA for weapons smuggling
The death of the History of Civilization…
The good General couldn't accomplish his first job in Iraq, why should we expect anything better out of his second stint there?
Support Debra Bowen's decision regarding Diebold voting machines
Coast Guard's Deepwater project price skyrockets
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
Places on the Web for your Progressive enjoyment.
Its My Right to be Left of the Center
Bring it On!
Sirens Chronicles
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


dusty1215 - > Dusty's View of Life -> Enemy Combatant section of MCA tossed out.
Enemy Combatant section of MCA tossed out.
Chalk one up for the Constitution!
From MSNBC:

The Bush administration cannot use new anti-terrorism laws to keep U.S. residents locked up indefinitely without charging them, a divided federal appeals court said Monday.


The ruling was a harsh rebuke of one of the central tools the administration believes it has to combat terror.


“To sanction such presidential authority to order the military to seize and indefinitely detain civilians, even if the president calls them ‘enemy combatants,’ would have disastrous consequences for the Constitution — and the country,” the court panel said.

In the 2-1 decision, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel found that the fIn the 2-1 decision, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel found that the federal Military Commissions Act doesn’t strip Ali al-Marri, a legal U.S. resident, of his constitutional rights to challenge his accusers in court. It ruled the government must allow al-Marri to be released from military detention.

The government intends to ask the full 4th Circuit to hear the case, Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd said.

“The president has made clear that he intends to use all available tools at his disposal to protect Americans from further al-Qaida attack, including the capture and detention of al-Qaida agents who enter our borders,” Boyd said in a statement.

Al-Marri has been held in solitary confinement in the Navy brig in Charleston, S.C., since June 2003. The Qatar native has been detained since his December 2001 arrest at his home in Peoria, Ill., where he moved with his wife and five children a day before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to study for a master’s degree at Bradley University.

“This is a landmark victory for the rule of law and a defeat for unchecked executive power,” al-Marri’s lawyer, Jonathan Hafetz, said in a statement. “It affirms the basic constitutional rights of all individuals — citizens and immigrants — in the United States.”

The court said its ruling doesn’t mean al-Marri should be set free. Instead, he can be returned to the civilian court system and tried on criminal charges.

“But the government cannot subject al-Marri to indefinite military detention,” the opinion said. “For in the United States, the military cannot seize and imprison civilians — let alone imprison them indefinitely.”

Al-Marri is currently the only U.S. resident held as an enemy combatant within the U.S.

BushCo is probably pissin' down both legs over this ruling.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in these Groups:
Topics: facism, dictator, military commissions act, bush
posted by dusty1215 on Tuesday, June 12, 2007 at 10:47 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 23 times
8 comments from 4 users

1

posted by dusty1215 on Jun 12, 2007 at 10:52 AM
If Al-Marri is tried in a conventional court..there goes all that non-existent evidence! :P
posted by randomfactor on Jun 12, 2007 at 11:14 AM

I believe Keith Olbermann characterized the Bush Regime's response to this development as "wrong answer, try again."

 

posted by mattloch on Jun 12, 2007 at 11:14 AM
They'll charge him with something. And I'm sure he's sufficiently brainwashed and pliant now that he'll sign any confession they care to put in front of him.....
posted by dusty1215 on Jun 12, 2007 at 11:25 AM
I haven't seen KO in two weeks!!!! I am so jonesing for some good political talk. News at my sisters house was a discussion of Paris freaking Hilton and Lindsey the jackass Lohan.
posted by robbwillis on Jun 12, 2007 at 11:28 AM
If Al-Marri is guilty of being part of Khalid Sheik Mohammed's Al Qaeda sleeper cell and came to the United States to prepare for a second wave of terrorist strikes it should be a slam dunk to keep him in prison forever. If he's not guilty, it has been a travesty to keep him in jail. I'm guessing the authorities didn't want him to have a trial because of the witnesses and info that will become public. Now we'll see, but you have to hope a bad guy doesn't get away to play another day. 
posted by randomfactor on Jun 12, 2007 at 11:30 AM
Dusty, I didn't bother watching Countdown last night, as Keith wasn't on it and the lead story was..Paris freaking Hilton.
posted by dusty1215 on Jun 12, 2007 at 11:33 AM
Random, I am so sick of Paris freaking Hilton I could scream. Robb..I do hope that IF he is guilty they slam his ass into jail for eternity. But the fact that they keep changing the charges doesn't look like they have much on him.
posted by robbwillis on Jun 12, 2007 at 12:16 PM
I hear that. I'm worried about the defense lawyers winning at any cost, which is their job. Undoubtably, there is a lot of classifed information surrounding this case. On one hand, you have people trying to protect the country. On the other, you have people that think there should be complete transparency and no clandestine operations at all. This pendulum seems to have swung to wildly over the last couple of decades when it belongs somewhere in the middle.
1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: