|
Bond's record-setting baseball will go into the HOF with an asterisk. "distract, delude, amuse and insulate us." People trust the Democrats more than they trust Republicans. Are you smarter than the average American? Test your knowledge of the news.. Neo-Nazi's go after the Jena 6 Feds investigating Blackwater USA for weapons smuggling The death of the History of Civilization… The good General couldn't accomplish his first job in Iraq, why should we expect anything better out of his second stint there? Support Debra Bowen's decision regarding Diebold voting machines Coast Guard's Deepwater project price skyrockets June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 Its My Right to be Left of the Center Bring it On! Sirens Chronicles
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
People trust the Democrats more than they trust Republicans.
At least Gallup Polling says so:they have been polling the American public on these questions for over 50 years:
Public Prefers Democratic Party to Republican for handling terrorism, military security by Lydia Saad GALLUP NEWS SERVICE PRINCETON, NJ -- Public attitudes toward the two major political parties have not changed much in recent months. That's good news for the Democratic Party, which moved into a superior image position when compared to the Republican Party more than a year ago. Americans not only continue to view the Democratic Party more favorably than the Republican Party in general terms, but they also choose the Democratic party as the preferred party for maintaining the nation's economic prosperity. And, in a departure from recent history, Americans see the Democrats as the political party better able to protect the country from terrorism. According to Gallup's annual Governance survey, conducted Sept. 14-16, 2007, the Democratic Party enjoys a 15-point lead over the Republicans in overall favorability, 53% vs. 38%. These ratings are nearly identical to those obtained during July 2007. Gallup's frequent measurement of party favorability in recent years shows that favorable views of the two major parties were fairly balanced between January 2003 and February 2005. In this period, positive ratings of both parties typically ranged between 47% and 55%, with a high rating of 56% for the Republicans in 2003 (shortly after the start of the Iraq War) and a high rating of 59% for the Democrats in January 2004 (immediately following the New Hampshire Democratic primary). However, starting in the second half of 2005, the public's positive image of the Republican Party began to show signs of decline. Since April 2006, the Democrats have maintained a consistently strong advantage in favorability, averaging about 14 points. The recent gain in the Democratic Party's image advantage is due primarily to a sharp decline in Americans' favorable perceptions of the Republican Party more than an improvement in the public's perception of the Democrats. This is particularly evident when looking at annual averages of the favorable ratings for each party. Between 2002 and today, the percentage of Americans with a favorable view of the Republican Party fell from 54.7% to 38.7% -- a 16-percentage point decline. (This was after a sharp rise in Republican Party ratings between 2001 and 2002 following the 9/11 terrorist attacks.) Over the same period, the Democrats' average favorable rating barely changed, falling by 1 percentage point (from 54.0% to 53.0%). Party of Prosperity For more than a half century Gallup has asked Americans whether the Republican Party or Democratic Party would do the better job keeping the country prosperous. Since 2001 the Democrat Party has either tied or led the Republicans on this measure. However, that lead expanded significantly between September 2005 and September 2006, from 5 points to 17 points, and is currently 20 points. Fifty-four percent of Americans now say the Democrats would do the better job, compared with only 34% choosing the Republicans. Party of National Security Through this period of decline in the Republicans' overall favorability, one enduring strength for the GOP has been the perception that it is the better party for handling international terrorism and national defense. One year after the 9/11 attacks, the Republicans had a 19-point lead over the Democrats in this area. That lead gradually sank to a statistically non-significant 2-point lead in 2006. This year, for the first time since Gallup started asking this question in 2002, more Americans say the Democratic Party will do a better job than the Republican Party of protecting the country from security threats, 47% vs. 42%. These results mirror those Gallup obtained last October when it found a 46%-41% advantage for "the Democrats in Congress" over "the Republicans in Congress" when Americans were asked which representatives do the better job handling terrorism. Thus, Democrats likely gained the upper hand on the terrorism issue last fall just before the elections, and have been able to maintain that slim advantage since then. Tethered to the Party Leader The recent declines in public preferences for the Republican Party on the economy and terrorism run parallel to the decline of the Republican Party's overall favorability. For the rest of this detailed summary click the link at the top. 9 comments from 5 users
1
posted by
BJD
on Sep 25, 2007 at 02:33 PM
For the first time, I have to admit that I have absolutely no confidence that either party can make any progress whatsoever on any issue that is important to me. For the first time, I have to conclude that voting for anyone is a mistake, because I don't believe in anyone's platform, and even if I believed what they said, I can't believe they believe it. Unfortunately, I think the majority of the people who answer these polls just don't have the knowledge to back up their opinions. The American people don't have the first clue what the President is responsible for. They don't understand the separation of powers or the roles of each branch. They just listen to the BS they hear from their favorite celebrity, and believe what they hear. And the politicians in both parties are just chasing those people's votes. posted by
dusty1215
on Sep 25, 2007 at 02:44 PM
The evening news casts are all getting lousy ratings from another article I read, and I think it goes to people not trusting them either to give us the straight scoop. Everyone has an agenda..and it ain't we, the people that they serve. posted by
BJD
on Sep 25, 2007 at 03:13 PM
It is very frustrating to say the least. I used to be republican, but I just can't see how anything they do or say is going to help. But, in my opinion, the democrats are just as bad, if not worse. I can't vote for either, but what alternative is there? Voting for some other third party candidate is symbolic at best. But I've given up on voting for the least bad candidate. If the candidate is bad, why shoud least bad be acceptible? I guess the good news for me is that I don't think things are as bad in the world as a lot of other people do. I like my personal life, and the things politicians do don't personally affect me very much. I know there are people out there in this country that don't have it as good as I, but my vote for some politician, out of allegiance to the party won't help any of those people. And, I can count on all the bloggers here to make sure we all know it when any republican, oops, I mean politician, steps out of line. I am very interested in world and national issues, and I love to discuss ideas about how to solve them. But in the end, I don't know how depending on democratic or republican politicians to solve them will ever work. Hopefully I am wrong, and the next round of elections brings people who actually care about the issues they promise to address. posted by
dusty1215
on Sep 25, 2007 at 03:21 PM
Thank you for your comments they are quite illuminating since I am not familiar with you as a blogger here at b.com. posted by
BJD
on Sep 25, 2007 at 03:53 PM
dusty, I have been around for about a year, but I don't have a lot of time to spend here. I have gotten involved in some heated discussions from time to time, but not very frequent. My biggest problem is all the bashing, mostly republican and Bush bashing on this site, but also bashing of anyone and everyone who seems bashable. I think a lot of politicians start out with good intentions, then two things happen. First, once elected, they find out that they really don't have the power they thought they would have and their constituents don't understand why nothing is getting done. Second, they succumb to the pressure of the media, the voters, and the special insterests, and they end up just simply chasing votes for the rest of their career. Also, the government is so big, that it is impossible to manage it. I have worked in large companies that were actually managed well, but even so, there was always some amount of waste that got through, no matter how hard managment tried to control it, and there were always going to be bad decisions made, even though the decision makers are intelligent people. The government is so big that these problems are multiplied hundreds of times over what they are at the largest companies. So, bashing any of them is really useless and only serves to raise your blood pressure. People get so caught up in the critisizm of our leaders, but they couldn't do better themselves. posted by
dusty1215
on Sep 25, 2007 at 04:15 PM
This time around I refuse to allow personal attacks on my posts..if you can't address the subject, take a hike is my pledge now. I enjoy a good debate with someone on the opposite side of the aisle..and sometimes it just comes down to agreeing to disagree. But it doesn't have to get ugly..and there are intelligent bloggers on both sides of the issues here. Critizing our 'leaders' helps dull the pain of being so disillusioned with all the crap going on. I can't recall so much politicizing of issues in my life as I have seen in the last 8 years..its horrible. But there is so much money to be had out there with the lobbying groups and special interests..I wish they would outlaw them..but of course they wont..they are the cash cows.. posted by
theColorNine
on Sep 25, 2007 at 07:48 PM
"The recent gain in the Democratic Party's image advantage is due primarily to a sharp decline in Americans' favorable perceptions of the Republican Party more than an improvement in the public's perception of the Democrats." I think this is a very revealing comment. I wonder if these polls were done during other periods of strong American sentiment, such as during the Vietnam War, or during the beginning of the Reagan administration just after the American hostages were freed from Iran? I would guess that the favorable perceptions of either party are going to be tied more to the general puplic's feelings and the popularity of current events at the time than to who the president is or who's in control of Congress. Other than that comment, I don't think I can add anything more to the discussion, as you've both expressed my sentiments exactly, including my feelings about the personal bashing that's been going on as of late.
posted by
ronmexico
on Sep 25, 2007 at 07:50 PM
posted by
TomW
on Sep 25, 2007 at 08:43 PM
![]() 11%? I'm going to counter with 19487472% approval. I'm sure it's actually somewhere in the middle.
1
Our readers recommend: |