|
Bond's record-setting baseball will go into the HOF with an asterisk. "distract, delude, amuse and insulate us." People trust the Democrats more than they trust Republicans. Are you smarter than the average American? Test your knowledge of the news.. Neo-Nazi's go after the Jena 6 Feds investigating Blackwater USA for weapons smuggling The death of the History of Civilization… The good General couldn't accomplish his first job in Iraq, why should we expect anything better out of his second stint there? Support Debra Bowen's decision regarding Diebold voting machines Coast Guard's Deepwater project price skyrockets June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 November 08 December 08 January 09 February 09 March 09 April 09 May 09 June 09 July 09 August 09 September 09 October 09 November 09 December 09 January 10 February 10 March 10 Its My Right to be Left of the Center Bring it On! Sirens Chronicles
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Exporting democracy with bullets and bombs.
This is my reasoning for why none of these conflicts work. I am sure people will be able to "shoot" holes in my argument, but that matters not.
The "bad guys" for want of a better term, do not fight a traditional war. This fact was painfully obvious in Vietnam. You can not kill a thought, idea or belief system with weapons of war..you can only kill people. The whole idea of exporting our brand of democracy with bombs, bullets and thousands of soldiers is a ridiculous assumption being made by men who have never been to war. Not one of the asshats currently attempting this baloney has ever fought in a war. Eisenhower was a soldier first and a President second. I think that was perhaps a good thing. He saw first hand what war can and can not accomplish, and that was fighting a traditional war where the enemy wears a uniform and carries a gun. Eisenhower's parents were both pacifists but did not object to him entering West Point. He went on to become a military leader and the president that ended the Korean conflict by advocating negtiotiations between the warring factions. Eisenhower had grand plans to end the cold war with Russia via talking but when the Russians shot down a spyplane, they said fudge it, and Nikita Khrushchev never did have Eisenhower visit Russia to continue the talks and the rest, as they say, is history. Eisenhower also kept our troops out of Vietnam, he was totally against entering that country. This final tidbit of info on our only Republican president to advocate negotiations over armed conflict, its from Wiki: "On January 17, 1961, Eisenhower gave his final televised speech from the Oval Office. In his farewell speech to the nation, Eisenhower raised the issue of the Cold War and role of the U.S. armed forces. He described the Cold War saying: "We face a hostile ideology global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose and insidious in method..." and warned about what he saw as unjustified government spending proposals and continued with a warning that "we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex... Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together." Our liberty is another man's hell on earth. Our liberty should not be shoved down the throats of people that do not wish to see it bloom and prosper. We can not make the world over in our image, and who are we to demand that our life is the best of all worlds and everyone who believes different should be wiped off the face of the earth? In order to bring our brand of democracy to the people of the Middle East we will need to use genocide..are all you folks that buy into the GWOT prepared to use that tactic? Are you prepared to kill an entire country of people because they will not bow down to our brand of freedom? Because if you are.. I want no part of it. I have been reading alot about Dwight Eisenhower recently, trying to find out how a life-long military man could be so good at trying to bring peace through talk and negotiations. I wanted to know why he warned us about the monster known as the "Military Industrial Complex". I think its very simple..he went to war, he lead the charge and he knew, in the end, that war only kills people..it doesn't kill an idea, thought or a belief. Are we trying to kill people or a ideal in the Middle East? Bombs and bullets will not work on the latter. A republican president figured that out..after he went to war time and time again as a soldier and a General. Bush, Cheney, Rummy, Rove and now Olmert have never served in a war. These men never learned the lessons Eisenhower did. That is why they will fail in their attempt to wipe out the "bad guys" in the Middle East. But I am no one..just a woman that reads quite a bit of history and a woman that respects the right of indigneous people to live their life as they see fit, regardless of someones belief system or their politics. Quotes from Eisenhower: Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the clouds of war, it is humanity hanging on a cross of iron. I like to believe that people in the long run are going to do more to promote peace than our governments. Indeed, I think that people want peace so much that one of these days governments had better get out of the way and let them have it. In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are H. L. Hunt (you possibly know his background), a few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid. I voiced to him (Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson) my grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and secondly because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. Peace and Justice are two sides of the same coin. 13 comments from 7 users
1
posted by
anonymous
on Aug 16, 2006 at 04:04 PM
The so-called bad guys don't fight a traditional war because they cannot win a traditional war, that takes huge sums of money, and guerilla war is war on a shoe string. The object of guerilla war is attrition to win by outlasting the other party.
In Mexico in the early twentieth century there was a stong central government and nosingle opposition group to effect any real change in the dictatorship that existed. Splinter groups, Viaistas, Zapatistas, and a bunch of other groups started anf fought a guerllia war until they won and formed a new government. Incidentally most of these groups were seen in the US at the time as bandits and terrorist groups and we even sent Pershing after them. That is what the stratagey in the Middle-East is and it always works, it worked in India and Pakistan and other places. Yeah non-traditional war gives the little guy a big stick, and a lot of little guys are wielding big stick nowadays. Whatever you think of Clinton, you have to admit he understands guerilla war, he bombed the hell out of Bosnia than turned it over to NATO except for a token force to protect our interests instead of getting caught in a sectarian ground war like the tall Texan macho man find himself in today.. posted by
dusty1215
on Aug 16, 2006 at 04:13 PM
I voted for Clinton, what can I say other than I did support him..and his biggest fault was sex in the oval office..compared to our current administration that is pretty tame. They spent millions of bucks trying to bring him down: white water, travel gate, etc..yet we can not nail the Teflon boys for anything so far.. posted by
Hardliner4freedom
on Aug 16, 2006 at 04:18 PM
posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Aug 16, 2006 at 04:19 PM
posted by
dusty1215
on Aug 16, 2006 at 04:26 PM
I guess my main point to this post is that a republican pres, who was also a military leader was smart enough to realize that the "military industrial complex" was something to keep a tight rein on. He also understood that negotiation was a better way to end conflict than guns and bombs. posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Aug 16, 2006 at 04:30 PM
posted by
dusty1215
on Aug 16, 2006 at 04:35 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Aug 16, 2006 at 04:58 PM
posted by
dusty1215
on Aug 16, 2006 at 05:07 PM
posted by
randomfactor
on Aug 16, 2006 at 05:21 PM
posted by
dusty1215
on Aug 16, 2006 at 05:27 PM
posted by
mattloch
on Aug 18, 2006 at 09:37 AM
posted by
allRED
on Aug 21, 2006 at 04:54 AM
1
Advertisement |