About dusty1215


Gender:
female
Member Since:
March 14, 2006
Last Signed In:
December 11, 2007
Profile Views:
21283
Blog Views:
74848
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Bond's record-setting baseball will go into the HOF with an asterisk.
"distract, delude, amuse and insulate us."
People trust the Democrats more than they trust Republicans.
Are you smarter than the average American? Test your knowledge of the news..
Neo-Nazi's go after the Jena 6
Feds investigating Blackwater USA for weapons smuggling
The death of the History of Civilization…
The good General couldn't accomplish his first job in Iraq, why should we expect anything better out of his second stint there?
Support Debra Bowen's decision regarding Diebold voting machines
Coast Guard's Deepwater project price skyrockets
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
Places on the Web for your Progressive enjoyment.
Its My Right to be Left of the Center
Bring it On!
Sirens Chronicles
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


dusty1215 - > Dusty's View of Life -> Russ Feingolds thoughts on Iraq
Russ Feingolds thoughts on Iraq
Feingold introduced legislation regarding Iraq recently. To read his latest writeup about the war and how its going, hit this link. The beginning of his article:

On Tuesday, I introduced legislation requiring U.S. forces to redeploy from Iraq by July 1, 2007. My legislation recognizes that a target date for the redeployment of U.S. troops from Iraq will help pressure the Iraqis to get their political house in order. Simply announcing when we will begin redeployment, without any end date, is unlikely to put adequate pressure on the Iraqis. 

A target date isn’t just critical to our Iraq policy, it is essential for our national security policy. We cannot adequately focus on the pressing national security challenges we face around the globe when so many of our brave troops are in Iraq, and so many billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars are being spent there. A timetable ensures that we can refocus our resources on fighting terrorist networks and on addressing trouble spots around the world that threaten our national security.

Because problems in Iraq won’t dry up overnight, my legislation would allow for a minimal level of U.S. forces to remain in Iraq for targeted counterterrorism activities, training of Iraqi security forces, and the protection of U.S. infrastructure and personnel.


Posted in these Groups:
Topics: Politics, Feingold, Iraq
posted by dusty1215 on Friday, November 17, 2006 at 10:52 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 152 times
8 comments from 3 users

1

posted by ki6amd on Nov 18, 2006 at 12:04 AM
And I thought the dems weren't going to "cut and run". I guess I was wrong, silly me.


--oops, sorry random, I forgot to say I am being sarcastic
posted by randomfactor on Nov 18, 2006 at 08:06 AM
That's OK, Ki6.  By the way, did you ever find that Osama bin Laden interview you claimed was in Playboy magazine? 
Guess you were wrong, silly you.
.
Apparently, anything which gets us out of Iraq is equivalent to "pulling a Reagan," according to the Republicans.  Good to know that our grandchildren will have a place to do their military service, putting down the "last throes" of the insurgency in Iraq. 
posted by dusty1215 on Nov 18, 2006 at 09:53 AM
Why do the repubes still think Iraq can be won? Not one of them can say what a win will look,sound or smell like.
posted by randomfactor on Nov 20, 2006 at 08:11 AM

Because they define "winning" as "keeping the troops in Iraq long enough that it becomes a Democratic President's problem to solve.

.

"Go Long," in other words.  But then, this administration seems to be adopting military strategy from Michael Jackson:

http://tinyurl.com/yf2yg5

posted by dusty1215 on Nov 20, 2006 at 10:55 AM
There is no win in this situation. Unless winning is defined by spending billions and having nothing to show for it.

The "Democracy" will collaspe as soon as we leave. The Iraq security forces will abandon their jobs as soon as we leave and all hell is going to break loose there as soon as we leave. Thanks for the link Random.
posted by randomfactor on Nov 20, 2006 at 10:57 AM
Winning is defined as not leaving Iraq.  Sadly, only Bush himself accepts that definition.
posted by randomfactor on Nov 20, 2006 at 11:22 AM
Dusty, Keith-O's got a Special Comment tonight, presumably on Herr Kissinger's pessimistic statement about Iraq...
posted by dusty1215 on Nov 20, 2006 at 12:27 PM
I get his Email service Random..I just saw it. should be interesting. Is anyone optimistic but the Shrub and Cheney?
1

  (You need to be signed in to leave a comment)

BAKERSFIELD.COM HOT TOPICS:

Advertisement