A blog about News.
About editorials


Member Since:
June 23, 2006
Last Signed In:
August 21, 2008
Profile Views:
8028
Blog Views:
108879
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Scariest movie of the summer
Ouch: Parra shown the door
Were women consulted in birth control draft?
No City Council challenges a bad sign
Budget deal may be the best we’ll get
Sacramento’s royal lawmakers
Should police go hands-free?
Make the taggers clean up the mess
How about harnessing political hot air?
Olympic Games used to showcase the old, new China
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05
March 05
February 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


editorials - > Editorials -> Use caution on recycling plan
Use caution on recycling plan

PUBLISHED 2/29/08 ---

Recycling what we can, rather that just thoughtlessly throwing away our waste, makes sense. “Waste not, want not.” Stewardship of our resources should be a top priority. As should our efforts to reduce trash dumped into county landfills.


Developing a refuse transfer station in metropolitan Bakersfield  should be a priority. It will allow trash to be separated for recycling. It will reduce the number of trips

pollution-spewing garbage trucks  make to the county’s Bena Sanitary Landfill, east of Bakersfield.


For these reasons, a proposal by a group of private refuse haulers to establish a centrally located garbage and recycling station in metro Bakersfield makes sense.
But Bakersfield and Kern County officials must proceed cautiously on the Metro Recycling Corp. proposal for a transfer station on Mount Vernon Avenue.


The proposed price tag for this facility is huge. Taxpayers and ratepayers — that includes property owners and renters — will be footing the bill. Technologies and mandates will change in future years. Bakersfield’s handling of waste must be able to change, as well.


Haulers estimate their project will cost $50 million in up-front expenses, $42 million a year in operating expenses, and an ever-escalating $2-per-household monthly rate hike. They also will seek a 25-year commitment. That’s a steep price and a daunting commitment for local government to embrace without considering other proposals.
The Bakersfield City Council and Kern County Board of Supervisors will consider the issues in the coming months.


Metro Recycling Corp. is proposing to pick recyclables out of the garbage stream, diverting about 30 percent of solid waste from the landfill, and saving thousands of truck-trips.


But since the city is already meeting state mandates for waste diversion, the push for a greater percentage of recycled trash, though desirable and admirable, is not urgent. And though metro Bakersfield would be wise to start studying new options immediately, there’s no need to pull the trigger on the first offer that comes along — especially one with such a hefty price tag.


Bakersfield Public Works Director Raul Rojas correctly points out that if the city builds a facility now and new diversion mandates are issued in 10 years, the recycling station would have 10-year-old technology.


Government officials owe it to taxpayers to shop for the best deal.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by editorials on Friday, February 29, 2008 at 02:28 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 17 times
0 comments from 0 users

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: