About editorials


Member Since:
June 23, 2006
Last Signed In:
July 03, 2008
Profile Views:
7949
Blog Views:
106039
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Who should pay for development?
Get 17-year-olds involved
Keep July 4th safe, legal, fun
Doctor’s stroke, community’s tragedy
California is going up in flames
Talk’s cheap, but campaigns aren’t
Move on, Bruce Sons
Time to weigh in on our future
Put leeches to work
Find the will to ‘fix’ homelessness
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05
March 05
February 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL
editorials - > Editorials -> Gun thefts demand change
Gun thefts demand change

PUBLISHED 5/21/08 ----

The theft of 20 guns from the Kern County Sheriff’s Department property room by a part-time employee demands a hard look at the Sheriff’s policies, procedures and available technology related to security.


Sheriff Donny Youngblood is justifiably furious and mortified that an “extra help” employee, 18-year-old Edgard Luis Nava, has been taken into custody in the wake of revelations that 20 handguns have disappeared from storage over the past six weeks.


The Sheriff’s Department learned of the apparent breach only after the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department arrested a Kern County man May 14 for possession of a concealed weapon — a handgun that was traced back to the Kern County Sheriff’s Department as having been previously confiscated. Talk about embarrassing.


What’s an 18-year-old man, hired off the street, doing with ongoing access to seized guns?


Should “temps” has access to drugs and firearms? Sworn officers have better things to do than serve as filing clerks for confiscated contraband, but hiring standards ought to be toughened to require proven work histories.


This isn’t the first such breach of the property room. A kilo of cocaine, worth between $15,000 and $22,000, went missing in 2001 and was never found.


The Sheriff’s Department should consider wider use of cameras, metal detectors, access restrictions in certain areas of the property room and random, occasional, end-of-shift wand-scans.


Meanwhile, find the missing guns. Sheriff’s officials have located four. In the grand scheme of things, 16 missing guns is hardly significant — not in a country in which there are millions of black market weapons floating around. (The FBI reports that an average of 274,000 firearms were stolen each year from 1985 to 1994 — and that’s only the thefts that were reported.)


But it’s the principle of the thing — and the liability. A violent crime committed with one of the guns stolen from the Sheriff’s Department puts Kern County taxpayers at risk.


Nava was hired through a program intended to get young people interested in law enforcement careers. That sounds like a worthwhile program, but let’s find other work for them to do.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by editorials on Wednesday, May 21, 2008 at 12:15 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 36 times
1 comments from 1 users

1

posted by oldblue57 on May 27, 2008 at 08:24 PM

But it’s the principle of the thing — and the liability. A violent crime committed with one of the guns stolen from the Sheriff’s Department puts Kern County taxpayers at risk.

What foolish nonsense is this? The guns were stolen. How in the heck is Kern County liable when a foolish young man steals guns from an area he wasn't suppose to have access. How can you make the connections that these stolen guns will be used in a violent crime and the taxpayers are at risk. Oh, I just figured it out. Another way to ban firearms, the public is not responsible for itself other than have the media save us!

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.