A blog about News.
About editorials


Member Since:
June 23, 2006
Last Signed In:
August 27, 2008
Profile Views:
8037
Blog Views:
109143
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Protect Panorama Park
Ruling protects election system
Voters don’t need holiday
Scariest movie of the summer
Ouch: Parra shown the door
Were women consulted in birth control draft?
No City Council challenges a bad sign
Budget deal may be the best we’ll get
Sacramento’s royal lawmakers
Should police go hands-free?
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05
March 05
February 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


editorials - > Editorials -> Talk’s cheap, but campaigns aren’t
Talk’s cheap, but campaigns aren’t

PUBLISHED 6/26/08 ----

Barack Obama has tried to portray himself as the face of change, and Americans in growing numbers are paying attention.


His across-the-board appeal speaks to voters’ interest in moving away from politics as usual — from corporate influences, from omnipresent lobbyists, from big money in general.


But Obama took a big step backward earlier this month when he changed course on public campaign financing.


Before he demonstrated the ability to attract vast amounts of campaign cash, Obama was in favor of public financing. He was the little guy going up against the intimidating Republican machine, the everyman who would carry the day with ideas and leadership, not advertising blitzes.


How things change. Now that Obama is the unchallenged king of campaign donations, he has changed his tune.


And his decision not to accept public funds for his presidential campaign puts the entire public financing system at risk.


As even Sen. Joe Biden, an Obama supporter, said recently, it’s “going to be harder to make the case for public financing” in view of Obama’s decision.


Now that he can raise twice as much from donors as the government would have given him if he’d forswore private donations, he’s opting for the bigger bucks.


Almost 80 percent of Obama’s contributions are $100 or less, “so he’s keeping with the purpose of public financing,”' Biden said.


Obama had the chance to demonstrate that he is a different kind of politician, ready to place principles above cold political strategy. Instead, he has demonstrated that, like so many others before him, successful or failed, he’ll take the cash, thank you very much.


In May, Obama brought in about $21.9 million — his lowest total in several months. He raised $31 million in April, $40 million in March, and a record $55 million in February. His total to about $287 million, 21/2 times the nearly $110 million Sen. John McCain has raised.


Had Obama opted for public financing, he would have settled for the same $84.1 million in public money McCain is accepting.


But $287 million is a lot of money. Sadly, much of that money came from donors who gave money because Obama seemed like the sort of candidate who would act on principle.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by editorials on Friday, June 27, 2008 at 11:51 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 35 times
7 comments from 4 users

1

posted by theColorNine on Jun 27, 2008 at 01:05 PM

Barack Obama is the epitome of "politics as usual."

 

posted by TSM on Jun 27, 2008 at 02:34 PM

Here's what Obama said: "If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election."

Since then McCain has violated campaign financing laws (laws he helped write).

Exactly how is it in Obama's interests to pursue an agreement with someone who has already broken the laws governing such an agreement?

 

 

posted by FloridaStateGrad on Jun 27, 2008 at 03:10 PM

You know, the best editorials are the ones which include both sides of the story before coming to a conclusion.

posted by TSM on Jun 27, 2008 at 03:59 PM

the best editorials are the ones which include both sides of the story before coming to a conclusion.

That's why you rarely see a good editorial from the Californian.

 

posted by FloridaStateGrad on Jun 27, 2008 at 05:19 PM

My old High School paper in Orlando had better editorials.. I should know, because I wrote a ton of them my Senior year..

posted by drilnliftcrude on Jun 27, 2008 at 09:19 PM

Don't worry kids.  This editorial board will still endorse the Obamessiah.

posted by TSM on Jun 28, 2008 at 07:00 AM

 

This editorial board will still endorse the Obamessiah

Extremely doubtful.

They endorsed McCain and Clinton in the primary.

Can anyone tell me if the editors ever endorsed a Democratic candidate?

 

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: