A blog about News.
About editorials


Member Since:
June 23, 2006
Last Signed In:
September 03, 2008
Profile Views:
8043
Blog Views:
109345
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Focus on educating children
Kern keeps luring film crews
Keep the legal drinking age at 21
We must change the way we think about growth
Labor Day: Save gas, lives
Terrorists targeting researchers
Protect Panorama Park
Ruling protects election system
Voters don’t need holiday
Scariest movie of the summer
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05
March 05
February 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


editorials - > Editorials -> Slowing down makes sense
Slowing down makes sense

PUBLISHED 7/18/08 ----

The last time things got really desperate for American motorists, the nation was in the grips of an Arab oil embargo that threatened supplies and created tortuous lines at the gas pump. The supposed solution: a national 55 mph speed limit, which Americans hated even more than the long lines.


This time the problem is not a political bottleneck in the supply pipeline, but soaring, speculation-fueled price hikes. The proposed  solution: another drastic change in the speed limit.


Rep. Jackie Speier, D-San Mateo, has introduced legislation aimed at setting the national standard at 60 mph. Sen. John Warner, R-Va., has requested a federal study on the possibility of a 55 mph limit.


All well and good if you don’t mind a new law that will be widely ignored. The better solution: Put some of the resources that would be necessary to promote compliance with a 60 mph speed limit into an educational campaign.


The message drivers need to hear: Driving a little slower can save you a lot of gas — and money.


Back when gas was $1.50 a gallon, that message might not have resonated much. But with California prices hovering just above $4.50 a gallon, it’s bound to get the attention of some people, especially with other economic challenges abounding.


If it takes $100 to fill up your SUV, wouldn’t you want to stretch that tank from five days of driving to six? Or seven? The difference in arrival time, especially on simple, crosstown trips, is typically just a minute or two. And driving 60 mph rather than 75 mph would have the same effect as slashing gas pump prices by 30 to 35 cents a gallon.


There would be a few side benefits. Enhanced safety, less pollution from emissions and a more positive impact on global warming issues, for starters. And decreased demand (not only from slower driving but less driving) could actually have a slightly beneficial effect on pump prices.


There’s also the possibility that by slowing down, drivers might be a little less stressed overall.


Cost savings is the motivation that will hit home most, however. Motorists who drive 12,000 miles a year in a mid-sized, 24-mpg car like a Camry or Taurus can save $250 a year driving 60 mph instead of 70 mph. In a pickup truck, $470; in an  SUV, $750. Other changes in driving habits, such as calming down, can also have a big impact.

Aggressive acceleration and hard braking, according to testing by Edmunds.com, can cut fuel economy by about 25 percent.


Consumers don’t know about these potential savings. Policy-makers need to tell them: Slow down and reduce your gasoline credit-card bill. We don’t need a new law for that message to sink in.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by editorials on Friday, July 18, 2008 at 12:29 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 64 times
14 comments from 8 users

1

posted by FloridaStateGrad on Jul 18, 2008 at 12:46 PM

Or we could put a ban on SUV's...

posted by PopeyesWorld on Jul 18, 2008 at 08:15 PM

Well, let's see here.  Just for kicks and giggles, when the prices started inching up, I decided to conduct a test.  I did all the right things: slowed down on the freeway, followed the speed limit everywhere, and behaved overall better.  Now, I drive a 1995 Suburban (big family and band), and fuel mileage only increased by about a mile per gallon, or about 40 miles per tank if I let it run down and fill it up completely.  I did find out that I got better mileage on the freeway if I cruised at 70 instead of 65.  I even toyed with 55 going to Porterville and it was worse.  So, i'm six one, half dozen the other about it.

Now, I am a delivery driver that drives a day-cab (a big rig with no sleeper) and 28 foot trailer (like UPS and Yellow Freight).  I normally cruise at 65 on the freeway (yes, i know).  I tried 55 on a about four tanks (200 gallons worth) to see if there was a difference.  To my surprise, I got almost 2 miles to the gallon better at 65 (7.9-8.1 per gallon) versus 55 (5.9-6.1 per gallon) in it. Now, with diesel sitting at 5 dollars a gallon, that makes a HUGE difference with semi's.  I could on and on about it, but I won't.

And as for driving around town...COORDINATE THE LIGHTS SO I'M NOT GETTING A GREEN AND THE NEXT LIGHT TURNS RED.  THAT'S A BIGGER WASTE IN THIS TOWN.

I could have a field day about all the lights around town.

posted by catpaw on Jul 18, 2008 at 10:54 PM

Strange, but I noticed the same in my Saturn. I don't save anything by driving 5 miles below the limit than if I do 70. Gradual acceleration from a red light in stop and go, however, makes a big difference.

posted by randomfactor on Jul 19, 2008 at 08:13 AM

I do, in my Saturn.  Not a lot, but driving 55 instead of 65 on the highway makes a noticable difference.

posted by Maggiepoo on Jul 19, 2008 at 09:23 AM

Roundabouts work wonders on fuel milage,, no red lights or stopping.... but not in the USA... sit in stopped traffic... geeez

posted by heyitsdennis on Jul 19, 2008 at 11:12 AM

Driving below the speed limit? You are risking your own life! I dare anyone to drive the speed limit on any surface street, highway, or interstate. You will be tailgated, whipped around and flipped off, as long as they have a free hand because they are not talking on there cell phone. Drivers are impatient, discourteous, rude, and think they have the right of  way just because they are late. When I am driving I am in the "survival mode".

posted by H8cloz on Jul 19, 2008 at 11:32 AM

I agree with heyitsdennis, especially on 2 lane, undivided highways like 46. If you're at the speed limit, you are bound to be in the middle of a dangerous pass, and end up head on into someone else. I swear, if I was in a Lamborghini doing 220, there would still be some clown in a 1978 Chevy pick-up truck bobbing around behind me, trying to pass into oncoming traffic. But, I like Maggiepoo's idea with roundabouts. Those would be fun in a Lamborghini!

posted by randomfactor on Jul 19, 2008 at 12:11 PM

Speed limit for those towing trailers is 55 mph.  Seems to me if *THEY* can go 55, I can too.  I'm pretty good about letting others pass, conscientiously using turnouts and passing zones where appropriate.

Recent events have made "survival mode" less urgent for me, anyway.

posted by Maggiepoo on Jul 19, 2008 at 12:22 PM

You would be amazed at how good they work , you can drive all day and never come to a complete stop or have to stand and idle, of course our petrol cost have always been almost double what the USA prices use to be,, we have alot of practice with fuel economy...

posted by H8cloz on Jul 19, 2008 at 12:57 PM

Well, there is a roundabout on Chester Avenue, after crossing the bridge from Oildale. That's how we keep 'em in Oildale. They can't figure out how to get off it, give up, and go home. It sounds something like this:

Looky ma, here comed that there roundy thing again. How comes we goed back by the streeet wees comed from? Oh well, we aint gettin anywhrrrr, lets go a home and cooked up that squrrel which I done ran over yerterday...I thank NASCAR's on now anyways.

Or something like that.

posted by H8cloz on Jul 19, 2008 at 01:04 PM

Or if you're Canadian, you say 'roundaboot'.

posted by Shwaine on Jul 19, 2008 at 01:05 PM

I find in my car that using cruise control makes a bigger impact on fuel economy. Very rarely can I manage to keep cruise on in town though. The traffic is too variable. But that is why I get great mileage when driving up 99 to visit family up north.

posted by randomfactor on Jul 19, 2008 at 01:10 PM

I use both methods.  I have a five-speed overdrive manual transmission with cruise control--set it to 55 and go for miles and miles before I have to shut it off.

posted by Maggiepoo on Jul 19, 2008 at 01:43 PM

Yea, forgot about the Father Garcia circle....there`s a start...

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: