A blog about News.
About editorials


Member Since:
June 23, 2006
Last Signed In:
August 21, 2008
Profile Views:
8028
Blog Views:
108876
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Scariest movie of the summer
Ouch: Parra shown the door
Were women consulted in birth control draft?
No City Council challenges a bad sign
Budget deal may be the best we’ll get
Sacramento’s royal lawmakers
Should police go hands-free?
Make the taggers clean up the mess
How about harnessing political hot air?
Olympic Games used to showcase the old, new China
Archives
June 06
July 06
August 06
September 06
October 06
November 06
December 06
January 07
February 07
March 07
April 07
May 07
June 07
July 07
August 07
September 07
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
More Archives
June 06
May 06
April 06
March 06
February 06
January 06
December 05
November 05
October 05
September 05
August 05
July 05
June 05
May 05
April 05
March 05
February 05

Blog Roll


Ask The Californian
Editorials
Entertainment
Eye of Bakersfield
Faith Forum
Fired Up!
Inside Sports
Neighbors
Right Thinking
Sound Off
Talk of the Town
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Share!


editorials - > Editorials -> Governor, it’s time to kick some legislative booty
Governor, it’s time to kick some legislative booty

PUBLISHED 7/20/08

Do you know what a “ripoff” is? It is when Democrats and Republicans in Sacramento don’t have the interest or the guts to fix the state’s budget mess, so they allow the pain to roll downhill to the cities and counties Californians rely on for their day-to-day government services.


So Democrats can keep spending and Republicans can keep saying “no” to closing tax loopholes and raising taxes, plans are taking shaping to raid local government funds held by the state for “safe keeping.”


Earlier raids on local government funds occurred when state budgets sank into deep deficit holes. But voters may have thought they blocked the move when they approved the governor’s 2004 megabonds for rebuilding California. The ballot measures included borrowing limits that allow legislators and the governor to “transfer” funds only in two budget years per decade. The money has to be paid  back.


The idea was to allow the state to use “special fund” money to plug short-term budget holes, not to enable the continuance of a dysfunctional budgeting system. But guess what, legislators are eyeing this money to avoid making tough political choices and reforming the way state government is financed.


Facing a $15.2 billion deficit, legislators are considering grabbing money from local government and transportation funds. Jim Earp, executive director of California Alliance for Jobs, told Sacramento reporters that legislators also may siphon off transportation funds from the sales tax on gasoline.


This news comes as the Kern County Board of Supervisors begins hearings Monday on the county’s budget — a lean spending plan that calls for 16 layoffs, shorter library hours and browner county parks. The library and county parks systems are expected to be particularly hard-hit in this budget. A total of 54 county positions would be eliminated.


Last month, the Bakersfield City Council approved a budget that kept 60 open positions unfilled and eliminated five more. Local school districts and other government agencies have cut staffs and eliminated programs. All are waiting for the other shoe to fall — the consequences of state budget decisions.


We have seen it year after year. There’s the outright borrowing. This year, that also could mean borrowing from voter-established “special funds,” such as unspent First 5 (Proposition 10 tobacco tax) money  and Proposition 63 mental health money. Even  Proposition 42 money — the huge bond measure we were promised would rebuild California’s crumbling roads system — is being targeted.


Then there’s responsibility shifting — a  subtle ripoff, where the state keeps mandating that services be provided, but shifts the cost to local government.


The big problem with all this borrowing is that it doesn’t fix anything. It just allows lawmakers and the governor to keep doing what they’ve been doing without fixing the state’s budget machine.


And what are lawmakers and the governor doing about this? Not much. Adoption of the state budget is more than two weeks overdue. Democrats are drawing lines in the sand over cutting programs. They have also proposed billions in new taxes, mostly targeting the rich. Republicans are refusing to close tax loopholes — not even the yacht tax scam — and holding their collective breaths on tax raising.


And the governor? Well, he’s getting impatient. He told The Sacramento Bee that he really didn’t “want to interfere” with legislators’ deliberative process, but “it’s almost like there is no emergency there. ... At one point or the other, you have to say, like they do with labor negotiations, ‘let us sit in the room and not leave the room until it's done.’”
Yawn. The Governator’s words and leadership are underwhelming.


Here’s an idea, Arnold. Slip on one of your action-figure costumes and start acting like a big bad governor. Kick a little legislative booty and get these budget talks going. Adopt a responsible spending plan.


Oh, and while you’re at it, make good on your promise to actually fix our dysfunctional state government, rather than just enabling it.

Posted in these Groups:
Topics:
posted by editorials on Monday, July 21, 2008 at 11:26 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 15 times
2 comments from 2 users

1

posted by drilnliftcrude on Jul 22, 2008 at 07:35 AM

The picture accompanying this editorial in the paper was of a librarian placing Spanish language books on the shelf.  This spoke volumes about the wasteful spending going on in government. It is essentially doubling governmentt spending (1 book in English, 1 in Spanish) to accommodate a group that does not want to integrate into American society.  This is just another reason why I will continue to reject any tax increases for any purpose.

posted by ChicoEsquela on Jul 22, 2008 at 07:50 AM

and lets add 1% to our local sales tax burden to allow them to continue profligate spending in Sacto (knowing we are doing our own taxation modalities which allow us to operate local govt even if they take a bunch of our taxes from another source to fund State Govt).

Makes a hell of a lot of sense to me???

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image on the left.
   

Our readers recommend: