|
By breast or by bottle? Thieves reach new moral low with Red Cross theft Web site wants stories of health care woe BCHS coach talks about practice preceding player's death BCHS football player's cause of death Local doc, patient in The New York Times Health leaders worry about fate of Medi-Cal A trip to the food bank The Pulse is on Twitter! I want some belated birthday cake August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 Here's some sites I find useful and interesting: Some fun blogs I like, some health and some random: Got a blog or link to add to this list? Please let me know at ehagedorn@bakersfield.com.
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Tax hikes vs. funds for health care, education
Would you be in favor of tax increases if it meant more money for schools and health care? A Democrat-controlled Assembly committee approved a new state budget last night based on a $9.7 billion tax increase, the first state budget proposal based on a major tax increase since 1991. According to the San Diego Union-Tribune, it would give schools $2.3 billion more than a proposal by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to freeze school funding and restore $1.5 billion in cuts to health and welfare programs. Democrats say the plan would avoid large reductions in Medi-Cal funding for low-income residents. (Assemblyman John) Laird (D-Santa Cruz) said the tax increase is designed to spare middle-income Californians. The big increase is a $5.6 billion income tax hike for the wealthy. Several business taxes also would be raised. Republican legislators, who must provide a handful of votes in each house for the two-thirds approval needed to pass a budget and tax increases, have vowed to oppose tax increases. The tax increases include $5.6 billion from imposing a 10 percent rate for taxpayers with joint returns above $321,000 an an 11 percent rate above $642,000, along with $1.1 billion from suspending businesses' ability to carry a portion of their tax-deductible losses into the following fiscal years for three years. What's your opinion on this? The CEOs of local hospitals have come out against the cuts to Medi-Cal, saying, "Our community hospitals and the lives of all Californians are in jeopardy." (Read the post, "'Access to vital health care is at stake for all Californian.'")
20 comments from 12 users
1
posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 9, 2008 at 10:38 AM
I'd be in favor of a tax increase under those conditions. And yes, I expect the Republicans to play politics with California's future. posted by
ehagedorn
on Jul 9, 2008 at 10:49 AM
AARP just sent this out: CALL YOUR LEGISLATORS TODAY -- CUTS TO HEALTH CARE AND VITAL SERVICES WILL HURT ALL OF US!
Doctors, clinics, pharmacists, adult day health care centers have been cut, and some will be forced to close. With more cuts proposed, the problem will only get worse. OUR MESSAGE: posted by
ProgressivePete2
on Jul 9, 2008 at 10:57 AM
I'm in favor of it as well. Especially because it targets the wealthy rather than middle class. It won't effect most (if not all) of us, unless we fail to do what's necessary. We certainly can't possibly get more tax money coming in by cutting taxes. I've always wondered why some republicans think that it works that way. posted by
ghostriter
on Jul 9, 2008 at 11:03 AM
I don't agree with any raise in taxes until they stop providing services to illegals at the expense of citizens. If they were to do that, I think they would be surprised at the amount of funds that would be freed up. posted by
WESLEYSMOMMY
on Jul 9, 2008 at 11:11 AM
AMEN GHOST!!! :) I have actually seen the numbers. It is astounding how much money is spent on educating, housing, providing "free" medical care, etc. to ILLEGAL ALIENS. Not to mention all of the money we spend on them in prison, court costs, public defenders..... posted by
sagefever
on Jul 9, 2008 at 11:11 AM
We have to do something~ and holding our own citizens hostage till we fix illegal immigration is not the way to go. IHSS is the program that helped me out so much when Kelsey was alive,it added around $400 to my monthly budget. Made a world of difference.
posted by
ehagedorn
on Jul 9, 2008 at 11:12 AM
To play devil's advocate, though, let me ask you this, ghostriter. Several hospital and health care experts say that we're paying for illegal residents one way or another. By not providing preventative care, we force them to hold off on care until it's unbearable. They then show up in emergency rooms, lengthening wait times for us all, presenting with more costly ailments to treat that citizens end up paying for anyway. So the dilemma becomes should we pay for basic medical care that could take care of problems before they get worse, or just wait until they come to the ER? How do you feel about this sentiment? posted by
Maggiepoo
on Jul 9, 2008 at 11:21 AM
Sorta a little off topic... Medicare paid out $77 million to bills summitted by doctors reported dead...just saw it on Bloomberg posted by
witbee
on Jul 9, 2008 at 11:37 AM
If I were wealthy and they passed this budget, I would relocate my permanent residence to Wyoming. No state taxes. Perhaps the democrats want to chase all the wealthy people out of the state? posted by
witbee
on Jul 9, 2008 at 11:38 AM
posted by
JesusSmokedABowl
on Jul 9, 2008 at 11:45 AM
If we chased all the wealthy people out of California, then the median home price in San Francisco might drop below eight incomes. posted by
WESLEYSMOMMY
on Jul 9, 2008 at 11:46 AM
Good point witbee, but illegals don't pay taxes usually. I say we send them home or at least keep them from coming in illegally, then re-evaluate things. I would be less resentful about paying taxes if I knew it was being spent on needy citizens and not on illegals. posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 9, 2008 at 11:53 AM
They *DO* pay taxes usually. They buy stuff at the same stores we do and pay sales taxes. They pay gas taxes. Their rental payments go to property taxes just like citizens. Make them citizens and their Social Security taxes will be withheld just like ours. In some cases it already is. posted by
randomfactor
on Jul 9, 2008 at 11:54 AM
If you are gonna raise taxes, raise 'em for everyone. But if you're going to *LOWER* them, make sure you only do it for the top 5% or so. --Republican proverb. posted by
WESLEYSMOMMY
on Jul 9, 2008 at 11:59 AM
posted by
nooneisabovethelaw
on Jul 9, 2008 at 12:30 PM
Ah, but you're assuming that illegal immigrants are always paid in cash, and not via a payroll system. Illegal immigrants usually pay all applicable taxes and frequently don't get any refund, either, and actually contribute to the current surplus of the Social Security Administration. But don't bother with actually researching a topic before coming up with some politician's gut-level talking point. It might be a distraction that keeps you from, you know, actually worrying about something important. posted by
nooneisabovethelaw
on Jul 9, 2008 at 12:52 PM
"Legal Status No Guarantee of Success. Figure 9 makes clear that immigrants who have legal status, but little education, generally have low incomes and make heavy use of welfare programs. If we decide to legalize illegal immigrants, we should at least understand that it will not result in dramatically lower welfare use or poverty for most illegal aliens. This does not mean legalization is necessarily a bad idea. But it does mean that those who advocate such a policy need to acknowledge this problem and not argue that legalization will save taxpayers money or result in a vast improvement in the income of illegal aliens. Legalized illegals will still be overwhelmingly uneducated and this fact has enormous implications for their income, welfare use, health insurance coverage, and the effect on American taxpayers."
posted by
ghostriter
on Jul 9, 2008 at 03:30 PM
emily, I personally think ERs should be limited to urgent or emergency health care only, and I know many who work ER who feel the same. No dice for someone coming in with a cold or a rash or something that belongs in a clinic; they should be sent away. And there are clinics that cater to this particular problem. The thing that gets me is when I have illegals coming into my medical office getting the best of everything at the expense of the state, while single working parents have to put off their children's care because their ten-buck-an-hour job does not offer health care. They make too much money to get MediCal, and that's a crime. It may sound mean, but I do not believe we are obligated to give illegals a free medical ride, either preventive or otherwise. They come over here and take advantage precisely because they know that they will not be turned away. And providing preventive care for illegals will not solve the ER overcrowding issue, because these people will still let their health problems go untreated. They are in hiding, and do not want to be caught. posted by
adampayne
on Jul 10, 2008 at 09:41 AM
No, we are not obligated to do anything for the undocumented illegal workers in our midst. If a person considers what doing nothing means they might reconsider their position. The costs of this shadow group of people who refuse treatment in hospitals or clinics for fear of imprisonment and deportation means that many communicable diseases that would be found early are not found until it is too late, at a tremendous cost to us all. We now have a serious outbreak in this valley of bovine tuberculosis, that our government will not even identify the dairies involved to the public. Where did the tuberculosis strain come from? How fast is it spreading, and in what directions? Has the disease tainted milk or other dairy products? Pasteurization kills the disease, but tuberculosis is an airborne pathogen. This outbreak can cripple California's dairy industry. We now have one of the largest foodborne disease outbreaks in history with the continually expanding salmonella story. Over 1,000 people in 41 states have been sickened, and the tomato industry stands to lose more than $100 million this year as the scapegoat. But tomatoes might not even be the culprit. FDA inspectors are now looking at the other salsa ingredients like cilantro or peppers. I find it no coincidence that the rise in diseases related to food are happening today as a result of the factory farming practices giant corporate farms employ. The costs of the nearly slave like labor practices are now being felt by all citizens. We pay the tab as corporate investors demand costs be controlled by refusing to hire at livable wages the people toiling in the fields and in the stockyards. The anger at the poor migrant is very misplaced. The anger by citizens should be directed at those who control the businesses and refuse to adhere to health and safety standards. We have allowed the corporate fox to run the chicken coop for far too long. Our local, state and federal government has failed every citizen by relaxing standards and not demanding from giant business concerns fair labor and health conditions for American workers. Don't blame the poor migrant, he is just the pawn to be blasted at to protect the real scoundrels hiding behind a purchased brand name. posted by
Btowntv007
on Jul 16, 2008 at 03:30 PM
We really are in a tough situation, with our governments so tied to tax money, that in times when the economy is down, the only real option is to raise taxes to pay for things. Although, I think there is a lot of wasted money out there that could be found to make up some of the gaps. I think regardless of your party ties, you all can agree that government wastes way too much of your money and mine. As far as cutting aid to illegal immigrants, in theory it is a good idea, but it probably will never happen. Can you imagine the riots the first time a hospital turns someone away for service because they are not a citizen? I would rather see more funding for clinics, then hospitals. Leave them to what they are hear for, major problems. Too many people go to the hospital with a cold, when that can be taken care of at an urgent care or a clinic.
1
Our readers recommend: |