|
22-year-old auctioning off her Virginity?!? Ladies, get ready! Jason Mesnick is the new Bachelor! Celebrity Dish Love Celebrity Gossip? Extreme Makeover home in foreclosure! Celebrity Circus! Still want to get married? Do it for free! DVD Easter Eggs? I survived a Japanese game show! AFI's 10 Top 10! June 06 July 06 August 06 September 06 October 06 November 06 December 06 January 07 February 07 March 07 April 07 May 07 June 07 July 07 August 07 September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08 June 06 May 06 April 06 March 06 February 06 January 06 December 05 November 05 October 05 September 05 Blog RollAsk The Californian Editorials Entertainment Eye of Bakersfield Faith Forum Fired Up! Inside Sports Neighbors Right Thinking Sound Off Talk of the Town
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Share! |
|
|
Are movie critics a dying breed?
Stephen Whitty of Newhouse News Service has written a story about the dwindling supply and need for newspaper film critics.
Apparently with the Internet avalanche of wannabe critics and the conglomeratization of the movie business — with its ability to spread rave reviews and hype about its films — the demand, supply and importance of film critics is diminishing. Which brings us to the question — Do newspaper film reviews help you decide whether to plunk down your money on the latest Adam Sandler comedy? Do you rely on bloggers or the guy down the street to tell you how the movie was? And how about Roger Ebert? Like him or loathe him? We at The Californian would like to know. Whitty's take is that veteran critics know how to put a movie in context — as he puts it, "trying to capture smoke in words, and get a purely emotional experience down on paper, with a sense of history and comparison and context and wonder." Does any of that matter to you, or would you just like to know if you're going to be entertained, jolted, excited, sad, humored or bored out of your skull? Posted by Steve E. Swenson 3 comments from 3 users
1
posted by
anonymous
on Jul 27, 2006 at 09:54 AM
The "studios", because they aren't really studios anymore, find it difficult these days to reconcile commerce and art. On the one hand, you have the Motion Picture Arts and Sciences association tirelessly promoting the artistic accomplishments of the industry around smaller films that do not generate much in the way of revenue. The other hand cranks out formula hits or tired retreads of those formula hits, and films driven solely by special effects of the latest in technology in desperate attempts to sell not only movies, but games, action figures, cereals, linens and whatever ever else can be licensed to bring in more dollars.
Studios really officially died in the 80s with the onslaught of merger/buyout mania that has made Hollywood an empty icon owned by the a few global media giants. Some of these giants are headquartered in New York, Time Warner, General Electric and Viacom. Some are foreign based in London and Tokyo like News Corp and Sony. The reality is the "studios" are just divisions of these global media giants utilized to promote their other properties. They do it by with stars, franchises and special effects. Stories don't even matter today, unless it is from some independents operating below the radar on minimum budgets. You would think critics would matter greatly in this setting but the opposite is true. Media giants realize that critics don't make hits, they only serve to limit audiences by noting the flaws, and the mounting expenses of seeing the same film over and over again. The media giants own most of the stations, most of the magazines, a lot of newspapers and a lot of the internet. Why allow anyone to possibly restrict profitability? posted by
gr8scott
on Jul 27, 2006 at 12:34 PM
posted by
MyLefteFoot
on Jul 28, 2006 at 07:25 AM
The downfall of reviewer's relevance started when two-bit reviewers were willing to sell a "good review " for celebrity access. I still read reviews just to get a synopsis of a movie to help decide if it's something I want to see.
1
Our readers recommend: |